Enhancing Familiarity and Utility: A Pre-Post Survey Study on Mental Practice Workshop Outcomes.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Carlos Hölzing, Benjamin Gordon, Patrick Meybohm, Nadia Spitznagel, Stephen Hearns, Oliver Happel
{"title":"Enhancing Familiarity and Utility: A Pre-Post Survey Study on Mental Practice Workshop Outcomes.","authors":"Carlos Hölzing, Benjamin Gordon, Patrick Meybohm, Nadia Spitznagel, Stephen Hearns, Oliver Happel","doi":"10.1177/23821205241299583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mental practice, a cognitive technique for practicing skills without physical movement, holds promise for enhancing clinical outcomes in emergency medicine. This study investigates its recognition and the impact of a basic workshop on emergency physicians' attitudes toward mental practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pre-post survey study involved 20 medical professionals who participated in a 2-day workshop. Assessments were conducted before and after the intervention using a structured questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial findings revealed that 65% of participants were aware of mental practice, and only 10% utilized it in clinical settings. Postworkshop, familiarity, and perceived helpfulness significantly increased from 2.2 to 4.1 and 3.9 to 4.7, respectively, with marked improvements in confidence and the intention to apply these techniques clinically by 100% of the participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that brief educational interventions can substantially influence medical professionals' engagement with mental practice, advocating its inclusion in medical training curricula to enhance procedural skills and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"11 ","pages":"23821205241299583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635951/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241299583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Mental practice, a cognitive technique for practicing skills without physical movement, holds promise for enhancing clinical outcomes in emergency medicine. This study investigates its recognition and the impact of a basic workshop on emergency physicians' attitudes toward mental practice.

Methods: This pre-post survey study involved 20 medical professionals who participated in a 2-day workshop. Assessments were conducted before and after the intervention using a structured questionnaire.

Results: Initial findings revealed that 65% of participants were aware of mental practice, and only 10% utilized it in clinical settings. Postworkshop, familiarity, and perceived helpfulness significantly increased from 2.2 to 4.1 and 3.9 to 4.7, respectively, with marked improvements in confidence and the intention to apply these techniques clinically by 100% of the participants.

Conclusion: The results suggest that brief educational interventions can substantially influence medical professionals' engagement with mental practice, advocating its inclusion in medical training curricula to enhance procedural skills and patient care.

提高熟悉度与效用:心理练习工作坊结果的调查研究。
目的:心理练习是一种无需身体运动就能练习技能的认知技术,有望提高急诊医学的临床效果。本研究旨在探讨急诊医师对心理实践的认知及基础工作坊对心理实践态度的影响。方法:本研究对20名医学专业人员进行了为期2天的培训。在干预前后使用结构化问卷进行评估。结果:初步调查结果显示,65%的参与者意识到心理练习,只有10%的人在临床环境中使用它。讲习班结束后,熟悉度和感知帮助度分别从2.2和3.9显著增加到4.1和4.7,100%的参与者在信心和临床应用这些技术的意图方面有显著改善。结论:研究结果表明,简短的教育干预可以显著影响医务人员对心理实践的参与,提倡将其纳入医疗培训课程,以提高程序技能和病人护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信