Comparing ultrasonography with magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of deep tissue injury.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Yasuhiro Sakata, Takanori Namba, Yasunori Umemoto, Tatsuya Yoshikawa, Kazunari Furusawa, Shinichi Asamura
{"title":"Comparing ultrasonography with magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of deep tissue injury.","authors":"Yasuhiro Sakata, Takanori Namba, Yasunori Umemoto, Tatsuya Yoshikawa, Kazunari Furusawa, Shinichi Asamura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep tissue injury (DTI), a pressure-related injury to the subcutaneous tissue under intact skin, has been featured in several recent studies. DTI is hard to detect, and by the time the injury becomes visible, extensive injury to the underlying tissue has often already occurred, resulting in a potentially serious and difficult-to-heal full-thickness pressure injury. Thus, early detection of subcutaneous injuries is essential, and previous reports describe the use of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for this purpose. The current report compares ultrasonography with MRI for detection of subcutaneous injuries.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>In the 2 cases reported herein, the use of ultrasonography and MRI led to the detection of DTI and intervention before the injuries reached the skin surface. In case 1, DTI was suspected on MRI, and ultrasonography confirmed findings typical of DTI, leading to the diagnosis. In case 2, MRI was used to detect abnormal findings at a stage in which no abnormalities were found on ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In both cases, MRI clearly identified abnormal findings, which suggests that it is superior to ultrasonography for visualizing deeper tissue. Consequently, the authors of the current report propose that compared with ultrasonography, use of MRI for the detection of DTI would lead to earlier intervention and healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"36 11","pages":"366-370"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deep tissue injury (DTI), a pressure-related injury to the subcutaneous tissue under intact skin, has been featured in several recent studies. DTI is hard to detect, and by the time the injury becomes visible, extensive injury to the underlying tissue has often already occurred, resulting in a potentially serious and difficult-to-heal full-thickness pressure injury. Thus, early detection of subcutaneous injuries is essential, and previous reports describe the use of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for this purpose. The current report compares ultrasonography with MRI for detection of subcutaneous injuries.

Case report: In the 2 cases reported herein, the use of ultrasonography and MRI led to the detection of DTI and intervention before the injuries reached the skin surface. In case 1, DTI was suspected on MRI, and ultrasonography confirmed findings typical of DTI, leading to the diagnosis. In case 2, MRI was used to detect abnormal findings at a stage in which no abnormalities were found on ultrasonography.

Conclusion: In both cases, MRI clearly identified abnormal findings, which suggests that it is superior to ultrasonography for visualizing deeper tissue. Consequently, the authors of the current report propose that compared with ultrasonography, use of MRI for the detection of DTI would lead to earlier intervention and healing.

超声与磁共振成像检测深部组织损伤的比较。
背景:深层组织损伤(Deep tissue injury, DTI)是一种在完整皮肤下发生的与压力相关的皮下组织损伤,在最近的几项研究中都有报道。DTI很难被发现,当损伤变得可见时,通常已经发生了对底层组织的广泛损伤,导致潜在的严重且难以愈合的全层压力损伤。因此,早期检测皮下损伤是必不可少的,以前的报告描述了超声检查和磁共振成像(MRI)的使用。目前的报告比较超声检查与MRI检查皮下损伤。病例报告:本文报道的2例病例,在损伤到达皮肤表面之前,利用超声和MRI检测到DTI并进行干预。病例1 MRI疑似DTI,超声检查证实DTI典型表现,诊断为DTI。在病例2中,在超声检查未发现异常的阶段,使用MRI检测异常。结论:在这两例病例中,MRI都能清楚地发现异常,这表明在观察深层组织方面优于超声检查。因此,本报告的作者提出,与超声检查相比,使用MRI检测DTI将导致早期干预和愈合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies. Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more. Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信