{"title":"Comparing ultrasonography with magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of deep tissue injury.","authors":"Yasuhiro Sakata, Takanori Namba, Yasunori Umemoto, Tatsuya Yoshikawa, Kazunari Furusawa, Shinichi Asamura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep tissue injury (DTI), a pressure-related injury to the subcutaneous tissue under intact skin, has been featured in several recent studies. DTI is hard to detect, and by the time the injury becomes visible, extensive injury to the underlying tissue has often already occurred, resulting in a potentially serious and difficult-to-heal full-thickness pressure injury. Thus, early detection of subcutaneous injuries is essential, and previous reports describe the use of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for this purpose. The current report compares ultrasonography with MRI for detection of subcutaneous injuries.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>In the 2 cases reported herein, the use of ultrasonography and MRI led to the detection of DTI and intervention before the injuries reached the skin surface. In case 1, DTI was suspected on MRI, and ultrasonography confirmed findings typical of DTI, leading to the diagnosis. In case 2, MRI was used to detect abnormal findings at a stage in which no abnormalities were found on ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In both cases, MRI clearly identified abnormal findings, which suggests that it is superior to ultrasonography for visualizing deeper tissue. Consequently, the authors of the current report propose that compared with ultrasonography, use of MRI for the detection of DTI would lead to earlier intervention and healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"36 11","pages":"366-370"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Deep tissue injury (DTI), a pressure-related injury to the subcutaneous tissue under intact skin, has been featured in several recent studies. DTI is hard to detect, and by the time the injury becomes visible, extensive injury to the underlying tissue has often already occurred, resulting in a potentially serious and difficult-to-heal full-thickness pressure injury. Thus, early detection of subcutaneous injuries is essential, and previous reports describe the use of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for this purpose. The current report compares ultrasonography with MRI for detection of subcutaneous injuries.
Case report: In the 2 cases reported herein, the use of ultrasonography and MRI led to the detection of DTI and intervention before the injuries reached the skin surface. In case 1, DTI was suspected on MRI, and ultrasonography confirmed findings typical of DTI, leading to the diagnosis. In case 2, MRI was used to detect abnormal findings at a stage in which no abnormalities were found on ultrasonography.
Conclusion: In both cases, MRI clearly identified abnormal findings, which suggests that it is superior to ultrasonography for visualizing deeper tissue. Consequently, the authors of the current report propose that compared with ultrasonography, use of MRI for the detection of DTI would lead to earlier intervention and healing.
期刊介绍:
Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies.
Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more.
Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.