Neural dynamics of personality trait perception and interaction preferences.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Martin Weiß, Marko Paelecke, Patrick Mussel, Grit Hein
{"title":"Neural dynamics of personality trait perception and interaction preferences.","authors":"Martin Weiß, Marko Paelecke, Patrick Mussel, Grit Hein","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-76423-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to recent research, self-reported Big Five personality traits are associated with preferences for faces that are representative of certain Big Five traits. Previous research has primarily focused on either preference for distinct prototypical personality faces or the accuracy of trait ratings for these faces. However, the underlying neural correlates involved in the processing of prototypical personality faces are unknown. In the present study, we aim to bridge this gap by investigating whether participants' Big Five personality traits predict preferences to interact with individuals represented by prototypical personality faces, as well as the neural processing of these facial features. Based on theoretical considerations and previous research, we focus on trait extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism, and corresponding prototypical faces. Participants were asked to classify prototypical faces as above or below average representative of a certain trait, and then provide an interaction preference rating while face-sensitive event-related potentials (N170 and late positive potential) were measured. In line with our hypotheses, the results showed an interaction preference for faces that were perceived as high (vs. low) extraverted and agreeable and low (vs. high) neurotic. In addition, the preference for agreeable faces interacted with personality characteristics of the perceiver: The higher a persons' score on trait agreeableness, the higher the face preference ratings for both prototypical and perceived high agreeable faces. Analyses of ERP data showed that an increase in preference ratings for prototypical agreeable faces was paralleled by an increase of the late positive potential. Notably, the N170 did not show any neural signature of the hypothesized effects of personality faces. Together, these results highlight the importance of considering both perceiver characteristics as well as perceived features of an interaction partner when it comes to preference for social interaction.Protocol registration The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on the 8th of May 2023. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/G8SCY .</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"30455"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76423-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to recent research, self-reported Big Five personality traits are associated with preferences for faces that are representative of certain Big Five traits. Previous research has primarily focused on either preference for distinct prototypical personality faces or the accuracy of trait ratings for these faces. However, the underlying neural correlates involved in the processing of prototypical personality faces are unknown. In the present study, we aim to bridge this gap by investigating whether participants' Big Five personality traits predict preferences to interact with individuals represented by prototypical personality faces, as well as the neural processing of these facial features. Based on theoretical considerations and previous research, we focus on trait extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism, and corresponding prototypical faces. Participants were asked to classify prototypical faces as above or below average representative of a certain trait, and then provide an interaction preference rating while face-sensitive event-related potentials (N170 and late positive potential) were measured. In line with our hypotheses, the results showed an interaction preference for faces that were perceived as high (vs. low) extraverted and agreeable and low (vs. high) neurotic. In addition, the preference for agreeable faces interacted with personality characteristics of the perceiver: The higher a persons' score on trait agreeableness, the higher the face preference ratings for both prototypical and perceived high agreeable faces. Analyses of ERP data showed that an increase in preference ratings for prototypical agreeable faces was paralleled by an increase of the late positive potential. Notably, the N170 did not show any neural signature of the hypothesized effects of personality faces. Together, these results highlight the importance of considering both perceiver characteristics as well as perceived features of an interaction partner when it comes to preference for social interaction.Protocol registration The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on the 8th of May 2023. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/G8SCY .

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人格特质感知与互动偏好的神经动力学。
根据最近的研究,自我报告的五大人格特征与对代表五大人格特征的面孔的偏好有关。先前的研究主要集中在对独特的原型人格面孔的偏好或对这些面孔的特征评级的准确性上。然而,涉及到原型人格面孔加工的潜在神经关联是未知的。在本研究中,我们旨在通过研究参与者的大五人格特征是否预测了与原型人格面孔所代表的个体互动的偏好,以及这些面部特征的神经处理,来弥合这一差距。在理论考虑和前人研究的基础上,我们重点研究了外向性、亲和性和神经质特征及其对应的原型面孔。参与者被要求将原型面孔分类为高于或低于某一特征代表的平均水平,然后提供互动偏好评级,同时测量面部敏感事件相关电位(N170和晚期正电位)。与我们的假设一致,结果显示,人们对那些被认为是高度(相对于低)外向、和蔼可亲和低(相对于高)神经质的面孔有互动偏好。此外,对和蔼可亲面孔的偏好与感知者的人格特征相互作用:一个人在特质亲和性上的得分越高,他对原型和感知到的高和蔼面孔的偏好评分就越高。对ERP数据的分析表明,对和蔼可亲的原型面孔的偏好等级的增加与后期正电位的增加是平行的。值得注意的是,N170没有显示出人格面孔假设影响的任何神经特征。总之,这些结果强调了考虑感知者特征和互动伙伴感知特征的重要性,当涉及到对社会互动的偏好时。本注册报告的第一阶段方案已于2023年5月8日原则接受。该协议已被该杂志接受,可在https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/G8SCY上找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信