Atraumatic forceps-guided insertion of the cervical pessary: a new technique to prevent preterm birth in women with asymptomatic cervical shortening.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Perinatal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-16 Print Date: 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1515/jpm-2024-0444
Murat Levent Dereli, Mehmet Obut, Sadullah Özkan, Sadun Sucu, Fahri Burçin Fıratlıgil, Dilara Kurt, Ahmet Kurt, Kemal Sarsmaz, Harun Egemen Tolunay, Ali Turhan Çağlar, Yaprak Engin Üstün
{"title":"Atraumatic forceps-guided insertion of the cervical pessary: a new technique to prevent preterm birth in women with asymptomatic cervical shortening.","authors":"Murat Levent Dereli, Mehmet Obut, Sadullah Özkan, Sadun Sucu, Fahri Burçin Fıratlıgil, Dilara Kurt, Ahmet Kurt, Kemal Sarsmaz, Harun Egemen Tolunay, Ali Turhan Çağlar, Yaprak Engin Üstün","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>As previous studies on the use of a cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth (PTB) have produced conflicting results, we aimed to investigate the feasibility, acceptability and safety of a new technique for inserting a cervical pessary and compare it with the traditional technique in patients at high risk of PTB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women at high risk of PTB treated with a cervical pessary between January 2018 and January 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. After applying exclusion criteria, a total of 68 eligible patients were identified and retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was spontaneous PTB before 34 weeks' gestation (WG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 68 participants, 39 were treated with the traditional method (group 1) and 29 with the new insertion technique (group 2). The rate of spontaneous PTB before 34 WG was significantly lower in group 2 (p=0.020). Birthweight, APGAR scores and satisfaction with the method were significantly higher, while PTB before 37 WG was significantly lower in group 2 (p=0.043, 0.010, 0.009, 0.042 and 0.014, respectively). There were no significant differences in the rates of perinatal death (12.8 vs. 3.4 % in groups 1 and 2, respectively; p=0.229). The concomitant use of vaginal progesterone was required more frequently in group 1. According to the binary regression analysis, the new insertion technique resulted in a 5.42 and 3.97-fold protection against PTB before 34 and 37 WG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our preliminary results show that our new technique of pessary insertion is more effective than the traditional method in preventing PTB due to cervical shortening.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"358-366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0444","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: As previous studies on the use of a cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth (PTB) have produced conflicting results, we aimed to investigate the feasibility, acceptability and safety of a new technique for inserting a cervical pessary and compare it with the traditional technique in patients at high risk of PTB.

Methods: Women at high risk of PTB treated with a cervical pessary between January 2018 and January 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. After applying exclusion criteria, a total of 68 eligible patients were identified and retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was spontaneous PTB before 34 weeks' gestation (WG).

Results: Of 68 participants, 39 were treated with the traditional method (group 1) and 29 with the new insertion technique (group 2). The rate of spontaneous PTB before 34 WG was significantly lower in group 2 (p=0.020). Birthweight, APGAR scores and satisfaction with the method were significantly higher, while PTB before 37 WG was significantly lower in group 2 (p=0.043, 0.010, 0.009, 0.042 and 0.014, respectively). There were no significant differences in the rates of perinatal death (12.8 vs. 3.4 % in groups 1 and 2, respectively; p=0.229). The concomitant use of vaginal progesterone was required more frequently in group 1. According to the binary regression analysis, the new insertion technique resulted in a 5.42 and 3.97-fold protection against PTB before 34 and 37 WG.

Conclusions: Our preliminary results show that our new technique of pessary insertion is more effective than the traditional method in preventing PTB due to cervical shortening.

无创伤镊子引导下插入宫颈栓:预防无症状宫颈缩短妇女早产的新技术。
目的:由于以往关于使用宫颈托预防早产(PTB)的研究产生了相互矛盾的结果,我们旨在探讨一种新的宫颈托插入技术的可行性、可接受性和安全性,并将其与传统技术在高危PTB患者中的应用进行比较。方法:回顾性评估2018年1月至2021年1月期间接受宫颈托具治疗的PTB高危妇女。应用排除标准后,共确定68例符合条件的患者并进行回顾性分析。主要结局为妊娠34周前的自发性PTB (WG)。结果:68例患者中,采用传统方法治疗39例(第1组),采用新型插入技术治疗29例(第2组)。第2组在34 WG前自发性PTB发生率显著降低(p=0.020)。第2组的出生体重、APGAR评分和对该方法的满意度均显著高于对照组(p分别为0.043、0.010、0.009、0.042和0.014),37 WG前PTB显著低于对照组(p分别为0.043、0.010、0.009、0.042和0.014)。两组围产儿死亡率差异无统计学意义(分别为12.8%和3.4 %);p = 0.229)。同时使用阴道黄体酮在组1中更频繁。根据二元回归分析,新插入技术在34和37 WG前对PTB的保护效果分别为5.42和3.97倍。结论:我们的初步结果表明,我们的新型子宫托插入技术比传统方法更有效地预防由颈椎缩短引起的PTB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信