Machine learning to predict adverse drug events based on electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Qiaozhi Hu, Jiafeng Li, Xiaoqi Li, Dan Zou, Ting Xu, Zhiyao He
{"title":"Machine learning to predict adverse drug events based on electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Qiaozhi Hu, Jiafeng Li, Xiaoqi Li, Dan Zou, Ting Xu, Zhiyao He","doi":"10.1177/03000605241302304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the application of machine learning (ML) in predicting multiple adverse drug events (ADEs) using electronic health record (EHR) data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches were conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and IEEE Xplore from database inception until 21 November 2023. Studies that developed ML models for predicting multiple ADEs based on EHR data were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty ML methods were reported, most commonly random forest (RF, n = 9), followed by AdaBoost (n = 4), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (n = 3), and support vector machine (n = 3). The mean area under the summary receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.26-0.95). RF combined with resampling-based approaches achieved high AUCs (0.9448-0.9457). The common risk factors of ADEs included the length of hospital stay, number of prescribed drugs, and admission type. The pooled estimated AUC was 0.72 (95% CI = 0.68-0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future studies should adhere to more rigorous reporting standards and consider new ML methods to facilitate the application of ML models in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"52 12","pages":"3000605241302304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605241302304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the application of machine learning (ML) in predicting multiple adverse drug events (ADEs) using electronic health record (EHR) data.

Methods: Systematic searches were conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and IEEE Xplore from database inception until 21 November 2023. Studies that developed ML models for predicting multiple ADEs based on EHR data were included.

Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty ML methods were reported, most commonly random forest (RF, n = 9), followed by AdaBoost (n = 4), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (n = 3), and support vector machine (n = 3). The mean area under the summary receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.26-0.95). RF combined with resampling-based approaches achieved high AUCs (0.9448-0.9457). The common risk factors of ADEs included the length of hospital stay, number of prescribed drugs, and admission type. The pooled estimated AUC was 0.72 (95% CI = 0.68-0.75).

Conclusions: Future studies should adhere to more rigorous reporting standards and consider new ML methods to facilitate the application of ML models in clinical practice.

目的本系统综述旨在全面概述机器学习(ML)在利用电子健康记录(EHR)数据预测多种药物不良事件(ADEs)方面的应用:方法:使用 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 和 IEEE Xplore 进行了系统性检索,检索时间为数据库建立之初至 2023 年 11 月 21 日。结果:10 项研究符合纳入标准:结果:10 项研究符合纳入标准。报告了 20 种 ML 方法,最常见的是随机森林(RF,n = 9),其次是 AdaBoost(n = 4)、eXtreme Gradient Boosting(n = 3)和支持向量机(n = 3)。接受者运算特征曲线(AUC)下的平均面积为 0.76(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 0.26-0.95)。RF与基于重采样的方法相结合,达到了较高的AUC(0.9448-0.9457)。ADEs的常见风险因素包括住院时间、处方药数量和入院类型。汇总的估计AUC为0.72(95% CI = 0.68-0.75):未来的研究应遵守更严格的报告标准,并考虑新的 ML 方法,以促进 ML 模型在临床实践中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信