Prevalence of mandibular, condylar and ramus asymmetry in panoramic radiographs of adult individuals. A cross-sectional study.

Q2 Dentistry
Sandra Pinto-Wong, Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén
{"title":"Prevalence of mandibular, condylar and ramus asymmetry in panoramic radiographs of adult individuals. A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Sandra Pinto-Wong, Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén","doi":"10.4317/jced.62144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mandibular asymmetry is more common than previously thought. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of mandibular, condylar and ramus asymmetry by means of the Habets index using panoramic radiographs obtained from adult individuals.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study evaluated 210 panoramic radiographs performed in adults attending a private referral radiology center in Lima, Peru. Radiographs of both genders were considered, including permanent dentition and of good quality. A trained and calibrated evaluator assessed mandibular, condyle and ramus height using the Habets method, considering asymmetry when the difference between the two sides was greater than 3%. Fisher's exact test, the paired Student's t-test and finally binary logistic regression were used to determine the characteristics of the asymmetries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mandibular asymmetry was present in 39.5%, condylar asymmetry in 81.4% and mandibular ramus asymmetry in 48.6%, with no differences between genders (<i>P</i>>0.05). Only women showed a difference between the two sides in mandibular (<i>P</i>=0.008), and condylar height (<i>P</i>=0.013), although multivariate analysis showed neither gender nor age to have any significant influence on the occurrence of mandibular, condylar or ramus asymmetries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of mandibular, condylar and ramus asymmetries in the sample evaluated was significant, although most of these asymmetries can be considered mild, given that the highly sensitive Habets index classifies any difference greater than 3% as asymmetry. These asymmetries, although most of them could be clinically not very noticeable, should be considered when planning treatments. In addition, neither gender nor age was found to significantly influence the occurrence of these asymmetries. <b>Key words:</b>Asymmetry, condyle, mandible, orthodontics.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"16 11","pages":"e1332-e1338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mandibular asymmetry is more common than previously thought. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of mandibular, condylar and ramus asymmetry by means of the Habets index using panoramic radiographs obtained from adult individuals.

Material and methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 210 panoramic radiographs performed in adults attending a private referral radiology center in Lima, Peru. Radiographs of both genders were considered, including permanent dentition and of good quality. A trained and calibrated evaluator assessed mandibular, condyle and ramus height using the Habets method, considering asymmetry when the difference between the two sides was greater than 3%. Fisher's exact test, the paired Student's t-test and finally binary logistic regression were used to determine the characteristics of the asymmetries.

Results: Mandibular asymmetry was present in 39.5%, condylar asymmetry in 81.4% and mandibular ramus asymmetry in 48.6%, with no differences between genders (P>0.05). Only women showed a difference between the two sides in mandibular (P=0.008), and condylar height (P=0.013), although multivariate analysis showed neither gender nor age to have any significant influence on the occurrence of mandibular, condylar or ramus asymmetries.

Conclusions: The prevalence of mandibular, condylar and ramus asymmetries in the sample evaluated was significant, although most of these asymmetries can be considered mild, given that the highly sensitive Habets index classifies any difference greater than 3% as asymmetry. These asymmetries, although most of them could be clinically not very noticeable, should be considered when planning treatments. In addition, neither gender nor age was found to significantly influence the occurrence of these asymmetries. Key words:Asymmetry, condyle, mandible, orthodontics.

成人全景x线片中下颌、髁突和支不对称的患病率。横断面研究。
背景:下颌不对称比以前认为的更常见。本研究的目的是通过使用成人全景x线片的Habets指数来确定下颌、髁突和支不对称的患病率。材料和方法:本横断面研究评估了在秘鲁利马一家私人转诊放射学中心接受治疗的成人210张全景x线片。考虑了男女x线片,包括恒牙和高质量的x线片。经过训练和校准的评估员使用Habets方法评估下颌、髁突和支的高度,考虑到两侧差异大于3%时的不对称性。使用Fisher精确检验、配对学生t检验和最后的二元逻辑回归来确定不对称的特征。结果:下颌不对称占39.5%,髁突不对称占81.4%,下颌支不对称占48.6%,性别差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。尽管多因素分析显示性别和年龄对下颌、髁突或支不对称的发生没有显著影响,但只有女性在两侧下颌(P=0.008)和髁突高度(P=0.013)上存在差异。结论:在评估的样本中,下颌、髁突和支不对称的患病率是显著的,尽管大多数这些不对称可以被认为是轻微的,因为高度敏感的Habets指数将任何大于3%的差异归类为不对称。这些不对称,虽然大多数在临床上不太明显,但在计划治疗时应予以考虑。此外,性别和年龄都没有发现显著影响这些不对称的发生。关键词:不对称,髁突,下颌骨,正畸
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信