A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Cattle in China in the Past 10 Years.

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Baili Zheng, Yaling Cheng, Lan Ma, Yvxuan Cai, Yongchao Li, Yingyu Liu
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> in Cattle in China in the Past 10 Years.","authors":"Baili Zheng, Yaling Cheng, Lan Ma, Yvxuan Cai, Yongchao Li, Yingyu Liu","doi":"10.1089/fpd.2024.0120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shiga toxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (STEC) is a significant pathogen that can cause foodborne illnesses and pose a serious public health problem. To date, no systematic evaluation or meta-analysis of STEC carriage in Chinese cattle has been conducted. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of STEC in cattle in China over the past decade. We retrieved 1868 articles from 6 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and Baidu). Based on criteria such as sample source, isolation time, and species, we selected 39 studies (comprising 16,437 samples from 14 provinces) for systematic review and meta-analysis. The analysis results indicated that the pooled prevalence of <i>E. coli</i> in cattle during the selected time period was 6% (95% CI: 0.03-0.09). Subgroup analysis revealed variations in STEC positivity rates across different sectors. The highest positivity rate was observed in the slaughter and processing sector (12%, 95% CI: 0.03-0.17), followed by the retail sector (6%, 95% CI: 0.01-0.13), with the breeding sector showing the lowest rate (5%, 95% CI: 0.03-0.17). Among the regions studied, Shandong exhibited the highest pooled prevalence (15%, 95% CI: 0.01-0.30), followed by Hebei (12%, 95% CI: 0.00-0.30) and Hubei (11%, 95% CI: 0.03-0.09). These findings indicate an uneven distribution of STEC in cattle across China. Our systematic evaluation of data over the past decade provides insights into the prevalence of STEC in cattle in China. These findings may assist in the prevention and control of STEC in cattle in the country. We recommend conducting further epidemiological investigations and establishing comprehensive surveillance programs to identify risk factors associated with STEC in cattle, thereby enhancing prevention and control strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12333,"journal":{"name":"Foodborne pathogens and disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foodborne pathogens and disease","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2024.0120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) is a significant pathogen that can cause foodborne illnesses and pose a serious public health problem. To date, no systematic evaluation or meta-analysis of STEC carriage in Chinese cattle has been conducted. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of STEC in cattle in China over the past decade. We retrieved 1868 articles from 6 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and Baidu). Based on criteria such as sample source, isolation time, and species, we selected 39 studies (comprising 16,437 samples from 14 provinces) for systematic review and meta-analysis. The analysis results indicated that the pooled prevalence of E. coli in cattle during the selected time period was 6% (95% CI: 0.03-0.09). Subgroup analysis revealed variations in STEC positivity rates across different sectors. The highest positivity rate was observed in the slaughter and processing sector (12%, 95% CI: 0.03-0.17), followed by the retail sector (6%, 95% CI: 0.01-0.13), with the breeding sector showing the lowest rate (5%, 95% CI: 0.03-0.17). Among the regions studied, Shandong exhibited the highest pooled prevalence (15%, 95% CI: 0.01-0.30), followed by Hebei (12%, 95% CI: 0.00-0.30) and Hubei (11%, 95% CI: 0.03-0.09). These findings indicate an uneven distribution of STEC in cattle across China. Our systematic evaluation of data over the past decade provides insights into the prevalence of STEC in cattle in China. These findings may assist in the prevention and control of STEC in cattle in the country. We recommend conducting further epidemiological investigations and establishing comprehensive surveillance programs to identify risk factors associated with STEC in cattle, thereby enhancing prevention and control strategies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foodborne pathogens and disease
Foodborne pathogens and disease 医学-食品科技
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Foodborne Pathogens and Disease is one of the most inclusive scientific publications on the many disciplines that contribute to food safety. Spanning an array of issues from "farm-to-fork," the Journal bridges the gap between science and policy to reduce the burden of foodborne illness worldwide. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease coverage includes: Agroterrorism Safety of organically grown and genetically modified foods Emerging pathogens Emergence of drug resistance Methods and technology for rapid and accurate detection Strategies to destroy or control foodborne pathogens Novel strategies for the prevention and control of plant and animal diseases that impact food safety Biosecurity issues and the implications of new regulatory guidelines Impact of changing lifestyles and consumer demands on food safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信