Patrik Wili, Cedric Rauber, Amal Saade, Salomé Bliggenstorfer, Valentina Ramirez-Garmendia, Ramon Schweizer, Ainara Irastorza-Landa, Vivianne Chappuis, Philippe Zysset
{"title":"Primary Stability of Dental Implants in Human Jawbones: Experiments & FE Analyses.","authors":"Patrik Wili, Cedric Rauber, Amal Saade, Salomé Bliggenstorfer, Valentina Ramirez-Garmendia, Ramon Schweizer, Ainara Irastorza-Landa, Vivianne Chappuis, Philippe Zysset","doi":"10.1111/clr.14386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Primary stability (PS) is a key factor for promoting osseointegration and long-term success of dental implants particularly for immediate loading protocols. Beyond the current assessments of PS, an accurate pre-operative evaluation of PS would contribute to the improvement of surgical planning and treatment outcome. This study used biomechanical testing and homogenized finite element (hFE) analysis to objectively measure PS in the laboratory, and digitally estimate PS from prior μCT reconstructions.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty-five bone samples extracted from the jaws of two donors were examined. Twenty-two were finally evaluated for PS. After scanning of the samples with μCT, implants were inserted by two experienced surgeons, and various metrics such as μCT-based bone volume fraction (BV/TV), insertion torque (IT), and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) were assessed to determine PS. Mechanical tests were conducted to measure ultimate force (UFexp) as an objective indicator of PS while the hFE simulations were performed to estimate this same ultimate force (UFsim).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher correlation was found between UFsim and UFexp (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.85) than between BV/TV and UFexp (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.61), IT and UFexp (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.50), and RFA and UFexp (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.38). All variables demonstrated a statistically significant linear correlation with UFexp (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UFsim turns out to be a more reliable and objective indicator of PS than IT and RFA. The hFE analysis requires prior μCT reconstructions and is currently limited by numerical convergence problems. Despite these limitations, pre-operative hFE analysis emerges as a promising tool with a higher accuracy for estimation of PS than state of care techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14386","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Primary stability (PS) is a key factor for promoting osseointegration and long-term success of dental implants particularly for immediate loading protocols. Beyond the current assessments of PS, an accurate pre-operative evaluation of PS would contribute to the improvement of surgical planning and treatment outcome. This study used biomechanical testing and homogenized finite element (hFE) analysis to objectively measure PS in the laboratory, and digitally estimate PS from prior μCT reconstructions.
Material and methods: Thirty-five bone samples extracted from the jaws of two donors were examined. Twenty-two were finally evaluated for PS. After scanning of the samples with μCT, implants were inserted by two experienced surgeons, and various metrics such as μCT-based bone volume fraction (BV/TV), insertion torque (IT), and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) were assessed to determine PS. Mechanical tests were conducted to measure ultimate force (UFexp) as an objective indicator of PS while the hFE simulations were performed to estimate this same ultimate force (UFsim).
Results: Higher correlation was found between UFsim and UFexp (R2 = 0.85) than between BV/TV and UFexp (R2 = 0.61), IT and UFexp (R2 = 0.50), and RFA and UFexp (R2 = 0.38). All variables demonstrated a statistically significant linear correlation with UFexp (p < 0.01).
Conclusion: UFsim turns out to be a more reliable and objective indicator of PS than IT and RFA. The hFE analysis requires prior μCT reconstructions and is currently limited by numerical convergence problems. Despite these limitations, pre-operative hFE analysis emerges as a promising tool with a higher accuracy for estimation of PS than state of care techniques.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.