Turkish Version of The Renal Inpatient Nutrition Screening Tool: Validity and Reliability for Hemodialysis Patients.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nursena Ersoy, Emine Karademir, Ebru Bayrak, Muslu Kazım Körez, Hülya Yardimci
{"title":"Turkish Version of The Renal Inpatient Nutrition Screening Tool: Validity and Reliability for Hemodialysis Patients.","authors":"Nursena Ersoy, Emine Karademir, Ebru Bayrak, Muslu Kazım Körez, Hülya Yardimci","doi":"10.1017/S0007114524003192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to analyze the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Renal Inpatient Nutrition Screening Tool (Renal iNUT) for hemodialysis patients.The Renal Inpatient Nutrition Screening Tool (Renal iNUT) and the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) were used in adult hemodialysis patients at two different centers to identify malnutrition. The Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), regarded as the gold standard for nutritional status assessment, was utilized for comparison. Structural validity was assessed using biochemical values and anthropometric measurements, while reliability was assessed using repeated the Renal iNUT assessment. Of the 260 patients admitted, 42.3% were malnourished (SGA score was B or C). According to the Renal iNUT, 59.6% of the patients were at increased risk for malnutrition (score ≥1) and 3.8% required referral to a dietitian (score ≥2). According to the MUST, 13.1% the of patients were at increased risk for malnutrition and 8.5% required referral to a dietician. The Renal iNUT was found to be more sensitive in detecting increased risk of malnutrition in hemodialysis patients compared with the MUST (59.6% versus 13.1%). According to the SGA, the sensitivity of the Renal iNUT is higher compared to the MUST (89% and 45%, respectively). Kappa-assessed reliability of the Renal iNUT was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.58-0.9) and a moderate concordance was observed. The Renal iNUT is a valid and reliable nutritional screening tool for evaluating hemodialysis patients to determine their nutritional status. The use of the Renal iNUT by dieticians will contribute to the identification of malnutrition and its treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9257,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114524003192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Renal Inpatient Nutrition Screening Tool (Renal iNUT) for hemodialysis patients.The Renal Inpatient Nutrition Screening Tool (Renal iNUT) and the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) were used in adult hemodialysis patients at two different centers to identify malnutrition. The Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), regarded as the gold standard for nutritional status assessment, was utilized for comparison. Structural validity was assessed using biochemical values and anthropometric measurements, while reliability was assessed using repeated the Renal iNUT assessment. Of the 260 patients admitted, 42.3% were malnourished (SGA score was B or C). According to the Renal iNUT, 59.6% of the patients were at increased risk for malnutrition (score ≥1) and 3.8% required referral to a dietitian (score ≥2). According to the MUST, 13.1% the of patients were at increased risk for malnutrition and 8.5% required referral to a dietician. The Renal iNUT was found to be more sensitive in detecting increased risk of malnutrition in hemodialysis patients compared with the MUST (59.6% versus 13.1%). According to the SGA, the sensitivity of the Renal iNUT is higher compared to the MUST (89% and 45%, respectively). Kappa-assessed reliability of the Renal iNUT was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.58-0.9) and a moderate concordance was observed. The Renal iNUT is a valid and reliable nutritional screening tool for evaluating hemodialysis patients to determine their nutritional status. The use of the Renal iNUT by dieticians will contribute to the identification of malnutrition and its treatment.

本研究旨在分析土耳其版血液透析患者住院营养筛查工具(Renal iNUT)的有效性和可靠性。主观全面评估 (SGA) 被认为是营养状况评估的黄金标准,被用来进行比较。结构有效性通过生化值和人体测量值进行评估,可靠性则通过重复肾脏 iNUT 评估进行评估。在收治的 260 名患者中,42.3% 营养不良(SGA 评分为 B 或 C)。根据肾脏 iNUT 评估,59.6% 的患者营养不良风险增加(评分≥1),3.8% 的患者需要转诊至营养师(评分≥2)。根据 MUST,13.1% 的患者营养不良风险增加,8.5% 的患者需要转诊至营养师。与 MUST 相比,Renal iNUT 在检测血液透析患者营养不良风险增加方面更为敏感(59.6% 对 13.1%)。根据 SGA,肾脏 iNUT 的灵敏度高于 MUST(分别为 89% 和 45%)。经 Kappa 评估,肾脏 iNUT 的可靠性为 0.48(95% CI,0.58-0.9),一致性适中。肾脏 iNUT 是一种有效可靠的营养筛查工具,可用于评估血液透析患者的营养状况。营养师使用肾脏 iNUT 将有助于营养不良的识别和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Nutrition
British Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
740
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: British Journal of Nutrition is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering research on human and clinical nutrition, animal nutrition and basic science as applied to nutrition. The Journal recognises the multidisciplinary nature of nutritional science and includes material from all of the specialities involved in nutrition research, including molecular and cell biology and nutritional genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信