Feasibility and Acceptability of a Remote Group Intervention for Depression, Social Isolation, and Loneliness in Older Adults.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Gerontologist Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1080/07317115.2024.2440373
Jay Kayser, Chuxuan Zheng, Skyla Turner, Xiaoling Xiang
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of a Remote Group Intervention for Depression, Social Isolation, and Loneliness in Older Adults.","authors":"Jay Kayser, Chuxuan Zheng, Skyla Turner, Xiaoling Xiang","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2024.2440373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This mixed-methods study examines the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effect of a novel, remotely delivered group intervention (Empower@Home: Connected) targeting depression, social isolation, and loneliness in older adults (≥ 60).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Acceptability was assessed via participant satisfaction, and feasibility was measured by attrition rates and session attendance. Participants completed pre- and posttest measures of depression, social isolation, and loneliness, with depression also assessed biweekly. Post-intervention, participants completed semi-structured qualitative interviews about their experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>31 participants completed the intervention. The intervention had high acceptability and feasibility. Depressive symptoms significantly decreased. Reductions in loneliness and social isolation were observed but not statistically significance. Linear mixed modeling revealed a significant reduction in depressive symptoms during the intervention. Qualitative interviews highlighted participants' beliefs in the intervention's impact. They appreciated the convenience of remote delivery and valued shared experiences and emotional support from group interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This uncontrolled pilot intervention was acceptable, feasible, and reduced depressive symptomatology. Future research should refine social isolation and loneliness components and explore the intervention's long-term impact.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This pilot remote group-based interventions to address depression, social isolation, and loneliness in older adults was acceptable and feasible, making it a potentially valuable option for improving mental health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"757-771"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2024.2440373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This mixed-methods study examines the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effect of a novel, remotely delivered group intervention (Empower@Home: Connected) targeting depression, social isolation, and loneliness in older adults (≥ 60).

Methods: Acceptability was assessed via participant satisfaction, and feasibility was measured by attrition rates and session attendance. Participants completed pre- and posttest measures of depression, social isolation, and loneliness, with depression also assessed biweekly. Post-intervention, participants completed semi-structured qualitative interviews about their experiences.

Results: 31 participants completed the intervention. The intervention had high acceptability and feasibility. Depressive symptoms significantly decreased. Reductions in loneliness and social isolation were observed but not statistically significance. Linear mixed modeling revealed a significant reduction in depressive symptoms during the intervention. Qualitative interviews highlighted participants' beliefs in the intervention's impact. They appreciated the convenience of remote delivery and valued shared experiences and emotional support from group interactions.

Conclusions: This uncontrolled pilot intervention was acceptable, feasible, and reduced depressive symptomatology. Future research should refine social isolation and loneliness components and explore the intervention's long-term impact.

Clinical implications: This pilot remote group-based interventions to address depression, social isolation, and loneliness in older adults was acceptable and feasible, making it a potentially valuable option for improving mental health care.

老年人抑郁、社会孤立和孤独的远程群体干预的可行性和可接受性。
研究目的本混合方法研究探讨了针对老年人(≥ 60 岁)抑郁、社会隔离和孤独的新型远程小组干预(Empower@Home: Connected)的可接受性、可行性和初步效果:方法:通过参与者满意度评估可接受性,通过减员率和课程出席率评估可行性。参与者在测试前和测试后完成抑郁、社会隔离和孤独感的测量,每两周对抑郁进行一次评估。干预结束后,参与者完成了有关其经历的半结构化定性访谈:结果:31 名参与者完成了干预。干预的可接受性和可行性都很高。抑郁症状明显减轻。孤独感和社会隔离感有所减轻,但在统计学上并不显著。线性混合模型显示,干预期间抑郁症状明显减轻。定性访谈强调了参与者对干预效果的信心。他们对远程实施的便利性表示赞赏,并珍视小组互动带来的共同经历和情感支持:结论:这一非对照试点干预是可接受的、可行的,并能减轻抑郁症状。未来的研究应完善社会隔离和孤独感的内容,并探索干预措施的长期影响:临床意义:这项针对老年人抑郁、社会隔离和孤独感的远程小组干预试点是可以接受的,也是可行的,这使其成为改善心理健康护理的一个有潜在价值的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信