Jay Kayser, Chuxuan Zheng, Skyla Turner, Xiaoling Xiang
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of a Remote Group Intervention for Depression, Social Isolation, and Loneliness in Older Adults.","authors":"Jay Kayser, Chuxuan Zheng, Skyla Turner, Xiaoling Xiang","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2024.2440373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This mixed-methods study examines the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effect of a novel, remotely delivered group intervention (Empower@Home: Connected) targeting depression, social isolation, and loneliness in older adults (≥ 60).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Acceptability was assessed via participant satisfaction, and feasibility was measured by attrition rates and session attendance. Participants completed pre- and posttest measures of depression, social isolation, and loneliness, with depression also assessed biweekly. Post-intervention, participants completed semi-structured qualitative interviews about their experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>31 participants completed the intervention. The intervention had high acceptability and feasibility. Depressive symptoms significantly decreased. Reductions in loneliness and social isolation were observed but not statistically significance. Linear mixed modeling revealed a significant reduction in depressive symptoms during the intervention. Qualitative interviews highlighted participants' beliefs in the intervention's impact. They appreciated the convenience of remote delivery and valued shared experiences and emotional support from group interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This uncontrolled pilot intervention was acceptable, feasible, and reduced depressive symptomatology. Future research should refine social isolation and loneliness components and explore the intervention's long-term impact.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This pilot remote group-based interventions to address depression, social isolation, and loneliness in older adults was acceptable and feasible, making it a potentially valuable option for improving mental health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"757-771"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2024.2440373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This mixed-methods study examines the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effect of a novel, remotely delivered group intervention (Empower@Home: Connected) targeting depression, social isolation, and loneliness in older adults (≥ 60).
Methods: Acceptability was assessed via participant satisfaction, and feasibility was measured by attrition rates and session attendance. Participants completed pre- and posttest measures of depression, social isolation, and loneliness, with depression also assessed biweekly. Post-intervention, participants completed semi-structured qualitative interviews about their experiences.
Results: 31 participants completed the intervention. The intervention had high acceptability and feasibility. Depressive symptoms significantly decreased. Reductions in loneliness and social isolation were observed but not statistically significance. Linear mixed modeling revealed a significant reduction in depressive symptoms during the intervention. Qualitative interviews highlighted participants' beliefs in the intervention's impact. They appreciated the convenience of remote delivery and valued shared experiences and emotional support from group interactions.
Conclusions: This uncontrolled pilot intervention was acceptable, feasible, and reduced depressive symptomatology. Future research should refine social isolation and loneliness components and explore the intervention's long-term impact.
Clinical implications: This pilot remote group-based interventions to address depression, social isolation, and loneliness in older adults was acceptable and feasible, making it a potentially valuable option for improving mental health care.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including:
-adjustments to changing roles-
issues related to diversity and aging-
family caregiving-
spirituality-
cognitive and psychosocial assessment-
depression, anxiety, and PTSD-
Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders-
long term care-
behavioral medicine in aging-
rehabilitation and education for older adults.
Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.