Assessment of listening effort, real-life outcome, auditory working memory and attention in school-going children with cochlear implant.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Thejaswini Mirle Ramesh, Kamath Disha Deepak, Chinnaraj Geetha
{"title":"Assessment of listening effort, real-life outcome, auditory working memory and attention in school-going children with cochlear implant.","authors":"Thejaswini Mirle Ramesh, Kamath Disha Deepak, Chinnaraj Geetha","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-09135-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the listening effort using objective test (dual-task paradigm), parents report using abbreviated version of the Speech, Spatial and Quality questionnaire (SSQ-P10) and Teachers' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children and Ease of Listening (TEACH), working memory and attention span between children using cochlear implants (CI) and age-matched peers with normal hearing sensitivity, and assess the relationship between listening effort and real-life benefit in children using CI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Group I included 25 children with normal hearing sensitivity. Group II included 25 children with bimodal cochlear implantation with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss. The listening effort was assessed using the dual-task paradigm and SSQ-P10 whereas the TEACH questionnaire was used to assess the real-life outcome in children with CI. Also, digit span forward, digit span backward, and sound count test from CLAP-C were performed to assess working memory and attention, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that children with normal hearing sensitivity performed significantly better in dual-task paradigm, real-life outcome measures, digit span forward test, digit span backward test and attention test of sound count than children with CI. There was a correlation between reaction time in dual-task paradigm and real-life outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Listening effort and cognitive abilities are affected in children with CI. Listening effort can be measured in school-going children with cochlear implantation. Training may be required to improve real-life activities and improve the cognitive abilities of children with CI.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"1483-1491"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09135-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the listening effort using objective test (dual-task paradigm), parents report using abbreviated version of the Speech, Spatial and Quality questionnaire (SSQ-P10) and Teachers' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children and Ease of Listening (TEACH), working memory and attention span between children using cochlear implants (CI) and age-matched peers with normal hearing sensitivity, and assess the relationship between listening effort and real-life benefit in children using CI.

Method: Group I included 25 children with normal hearing sensitivity. Group II included 25 children with bimodal cochlear implantation with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss. The listening effort was assessed using the dual-task paradigm and SSQ-P10 whereas the TEACH questionnaire was used to assess the real-life outcome in children with CI. Also, digit span forward, digit span backward, and sound count test from CLAP-C were performed to assess working memory and attention, respectively.

Results: The results revealed that children with normal hearing sensitivity performed significantly better in dual-task paradigm, real-life outcome measures, digit span forward test, digit span backward test and attention test of sound count than children with CI. There was a correlation between reaction time in dual-task paradigm and real-life outcome measures.

Conclusion: Listening effort and cognitive abilities are affected in children with CI. Listening effort can be measured in school-going children with cochlear implantation. Training may be required to improve real-life activities and improve the cognitive abilities of children with CI.

人工耳蜗学龄儿童听力努力、现实生活结果、听觉工作记忆和注意力的评估。
目的:为了比较使用客观测试(双任务范式)的听力努力,父母使用简化版的语音、空间和质量问卷(SSQ-P10)和教师对使用人工耳蜗(CI)的儿童和听力灵敏度正常的同龄儿童的听/口语表现和听力易用性的评价(TEACH),工作记忆和注意力广度,并评估使用人工耳蜗(CI)的儿童的听力努力与现实生活中的利益之间的关系。方法:第一组25例听力正常的儿童。第二组包括25例双侧重度至重度听力损失的双模人工耳蜗植入儿童。使用双任务范式和SSQ-P10来评估听力努力,而使用TEACH问卷来评估CI儿童的现实结果。同时,通过数字前展、数字后展和声音计数测试分别评估工作记忆和注意力。结果:听力正常儿童在双任务范式、现实结果测量、手指跨距前向测试、手指跨距后向测试和声音计数注意测试中的表现显著优于CI儿童。双任务模式下的反应时间与现实生活中的结果测量存在相关性。结论:CI患儿的听力努力和认知能力受到影响。在接受人工耳蜗植入的学龄儿童中,听力努力可以被测量。可能需要训练来改善现实生活活动和提高CI儿童的认知能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信