Continental-scale interactions of Australian showy mistletoes and their hosts

IF 2.4 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Luis Y. Santiago-Rosario, Jordan Book, Sarah Mathews
{"title":"Continental-scale interactions of Australian showy mistletoes and their hosts","authors":"Luis Y. Santiago-Rosario,&nbsp;Jordan Book,&nbsp;Sarah Mathews","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.16443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>Showy mistletoes are obligate hemiparasites of woody plants. Host specificity is therefore a fundamental determinant of mistletoe diversity, persistence, geographic distribution, and abundance. Investigations of host specificity in Australian Loranthaceae have focused mostly on host range (taxon counts), but additional insights into specificity are gained by quantifying mistletoe prevalence on taxa in their host range and by exploring specificity in a phylogenetic context.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We estimated measures of host specificity to characterize mistletoe–host interactions at a continental scale by using occurrence records in the Atlas of Living Australia. We calculated host taxon richness, mistletoe prevalence, and phylogenetic diversity, and used rarefaction curves to evaluate sampling coverage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Many mistletoe taxa were represented by few records that listed the host, which often was identified to genus only. Mistletoe genera were recorded on 29 orders and 80 families, and no association was observed between host richness and number of records per genus. Rarefaction curves suggested that additional host orders and families remain to be discovered for <i>Amylotheca</i>, <i>Decaisnina</i>, <i>Dendrophthoe</i>, and <i>Muellerina</i>. Four mistletoe genera were most prevalent on Myrtales, one on Fabales, and one on Laurales. Rosids were most often the recorded hosts (84.3% of all records). We found evidence of significant phylogenetic clustering in host use by <i>Amyema</i>, <i>Amylotheca</i>, and <i>Decasinina</i>.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results, particularly the high prevalence on rosids, suggest that relationships of mistletoes with rainforest lineages may have been established early in the history of Australian Loranthaceae and that some lineages co-diversified with their hosts in arid regions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":"111 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajb2.16443","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.16443","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise

Showy mistletoes are obligate hemiparasites of woody plants. Host specificity is therefore a fundamental determinant of mistletoe diversity, persistence, geographic distribution, and abundance. Investigations of host specificity in Australian Loranthaceae have focused mostly on host range (taxon counts), but additional insights into specificity are gained by quantifying mistletoe prevalence on taxa in their host range and by exploring specificity in a phylogenetic context.

Methods

We estimated measures of host specificity to characterize mistletoe–host interactions at a continental scale by using occurrence records in the Atlas of Living Australia. We calculated host taxon richness, mistletoe prevalence, and phylogenetic diversity, and used rarefaction curves to evaluate sampling coverage.

Results

Many mistletoe taxa were represented by few records that listed the host, which often was identified to genus only. Mistletoe genera were recorded on 29 orders and 80 families, and no association was observed between host richness and number of records per genus. Rarefaction curves suggested that additional host orders and families remain to be discovered for Amylotheca, Decaisnina, Dendrophthoe, and Muellerina. Four mistletoe genera were most prevalent on Myrtales, one on Fabales, and one on Laurales. Rosids were most often the recorded hosts (84.3% of all records). We found evidence of significant phylogenetic clustering in host use by Amyema, Amylotheca, and Decasinina.

Conclusions

Our results, particularly the high prevalence on rosids, suggest that relationships of mistletoes with rainforest lineages may have been established early in the history of Australian Loranthaceae and that some lineages co-diversified with their hosts in arid regions.

Abstract Image

澳洲槲寄生与寄主的大陆尺度互动。
前提:艳丽的槲寄生是木本植物的专性半寄生虫。因此,寄主特异性是槲寄生多样性、持久性、地理分布和丰度的基本决定因素。对澳大利亚Loranthaceae寄主特异性的研究主要集中在寄主范围(分类群计数)上,但通过定量槲寄生在寄主范围内的分类群上的流行以及在系统发育背景下探索特异性,可以获得对特异性的更多见解。方法:通过使用澳大利亚生活地图集中的发生记录,我们估计了宿主特异性措施,以表征槲寄生与宿主在大陆尺度上的相互作用。我们计算寄主分类丰富度、槲寄生流行度和系统发育多样性,并使用稀疏曲线评估采样覆盖率。结果:许多槲寄生类群的寄主记录很少,往往只被鉴定为属。槲寄生属分布于80科29目,寄主丰富度与每属记录数无显著相关性。稀疏曲线表明,Amylotheca、Decaisnina、Dendrophthoe和Muellerina还有待发现其他寄主目和科。槲寄生有四个属,一个属在桃金娘属,一个属在法贝属,一个属在月桂属。道路是最常见的记录宿主(占所有记录的84.3%)。我们发现了Amyema, Amylotheca和Decasinina在宿主使用中显著的系统发育聚类的证据。结论:我们的研究结果,特别是在道路上的高流行率,表明槲寄生与热带雨林谱系的关系可能早在澳大利亚Loranthaceae的历史中就已经建立起来,并且一些谱系在干旱地区与其寄主共同多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信