Role of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index, Systemic Inflammation Response Index, and Pan-Immune Inflammation Value in the Prediction of Preeclampsia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Sadullah Özkan, Murat Levent Dereli, Fahri Burcin Firatligil, Dilara Kurt, Ahmet Kurt, Serap Topkara Sucu, Sadun Sucu, Sevki Celen, Yaprak Engin-Ustun
{"title":"Role of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index, Systemic Inflammation Response Index, and Pan-Immune Inflammation Value in the Prediction of Preeclampsia: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Sadullah Özkan,&nbsp;Murat Levent Dereli,&nbsp;Fahri Burcin Firatligil,&nbsp;Dilara Kurt,&nbsp;Ahmet Kurt,&nbsp;Serap Topkara Sucu,&nbsp;Sadun Sucu,&nbsp;Sevki Celen,&nbsp;Yaprak Engin-Ustun","doi":"10.1111/aji.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of the study was to investigate the role of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and pan-immune inflammation value (PIV) calculated from first trimester complete blood count (CBC) in predicting preeclampsia without (PE) and with severe features (PE-SF).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective cohort study included 126 women with PE, 126 women with PE-SF, and 126 women with healthy, normotensive pregnancies delivered at a large tertiary referral hospital between 2018 and 2022. The main outcome measures were SII, SIRI, and PIV.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>SII scores differed significantly between the control versus PE and control versus PE-SF groups, while SIRI scores showed a significant difference between the control versus PE and PE versus PE-SF groups. However, the PIV values showed a significant difference in all three groups. According to the receiver operating characteristic analysis performed for the discriminatory power of SII, SIRI, and PIV, the area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.801, 0.609, and 0.774 for the prediction of PE and 0.535, 0.701, and 0751 for the prediction of PE-SF, respectively. An SII with a cutoff value of &gt; 620.59×10<sup>3</sup>/µL (sensitivity 81%, specificity 67%) and an SIRI with a cutoff value of &gt; 0.94×10<sup>3</sup>/µL (sensitivity 74%, specificity 69%) had the highest discriminatory power for the prediction of PE and PE-SF, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our results suggest an association between high SII, PIV, and SIRI results and an increased risk of future PE and could be used as a first trimester screening test to improve decision making in the prediction of PE.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7665,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Reproductive Immunology","volume":"92 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Reproductive Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aji.70029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the study was to investigate the role of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and pan-immune inflammation value (PIV) calculated from first trimester complete blood count (CBC) in predicting preeclampsia without (PE) and with severe features (PE-SF).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 126 women with PE, 126 women with PE-SF, and 126 women with healthy, normotensive pregnancies delivered at a large tertiary referral hospital between 2018 and 2022. The main outcome measures were SII, SIRI, and PIV.

Results

SII scores differed significantly between the control versus PE and control versus PE-SF groups, while SIRI scores showed a significant difference between the control versus PE and PE versus PE-SF groups. However, the PIV values showed a significant difference in all three groups. According to the receiver operating characteristic analysis performed for the discriminatory power of SII, SIRI, and PIV, the area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.801, 0.609, and 0.774 for the prediction of PE and 0.535, 0.701, and 0751 for the prediction of PE-SF, respectively. An SII with a cutoff value of > 620.59×103/µL (sensitivity 81%, specificity 67%) and an SIRI with a cutoff value of > 0.94×103/µL (sensitivity 74%, specificity 69%) had the highest discriminatory power for the prediction of PE and PE-SF, respectively.

Conclusion

Our results suggest an association between high SII, PIV, and SIRI results and an increased risk of future PE and could be used as a first trimester screening test to improve decision making in the prediction of PE.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
314
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Reproductive Immunology is an international journal devoted to the presentation of current information in all areas relating to Reproductive Immunology. The journal is directed toward both the basic scientist and the clinician, covering the whole process of reproduction as affected by immunological processes. The journal covers a variety of subspecialty topics, including fertility immunology, pregnancy immunology, immunogenetics, mucosal immunology, immunocontraception, endometriosis, abortion, tumor immunology of the reproductive tract, autoantibodies, infectious disease of the reproductive tract, and technical news.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信