Advantages of low-cost LiDAR sensors in surveying underground utility networks

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Angelina Jerjomina, Sander Varbla
{"title":"Advantages of low-cost LiDAR sensors in surveying underground utility networks","authors":"Angelina Jerjomina, Sander Varbla","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2024.106325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate knowledge of underground utility networks’ placement facilitates various tasks, such as urban development. The most accurate data can be acquired via geodetic surveys using total stations during construction while the trench has yet to be backfilled. However, the period between networks’ instalment and trench backfilling is often short, meaning that surveyors may arrive at construction sites after backfilling, making geodetic surveys impossible. A solution to this problem could be for contractors to measure the networks themselves right after the installation has been finalised. Accordingly, this study proposes an alternative surveying approach to conventional geodetic surveys. The recent emergence of low-cost LiDAR sensors provides novel data collection possibilities, making point cloud surveys accessible to many new users like construction contractors; this study evaluates the suitability of an Apple LiDAR sensor. In addition to a controlled office experiment for apprising different surveying approaches, surveys were conducted at three construction sites. Accuracy estimates generally in the range of 2…5 cm were obtained. Furthermore, the outer diameters of over 200 mm pipes and slopes of gravity flow pipelines could also be determined relatively reliably. Compared to conventional total station surveys or terrestrial laser scanning, which is employed for validation, the low-cost LiDAR surveys are also significantly faster, taking only a few minutes when utility networks span up to 100 m<ce:sup loc=\"post\">2</ce:sup>. It is concluded that Apple LiDAR sensors could mitigate problems associated with fast-paced construction schedules that typically hinder underground utility networks’ surveys by allowing quick and operational data collection before trench backfilling. Practical tests demonstrate that contractors can conduct such surveys independently after training.","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.106325","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate knowledge of underground utility networks’ placement facilitates various tasks, such as urban development. The most accurate data can be acquired via geodetic surveys using total stations during construction while the trench has yet to be backfilled. However, the period between networks’ instalment and trench backfilling is often short, meaning that surveyors may arrive at construction sites after backfilling, making geodetic surveys impossible. A solution to this problem could be for contractors to measure the networks themselves right after the installation has been finalised. Accordingly, this study proposes an alternative surveying approach to conventional geodetic surveys. The recent emergence of low-cost LiDAR sensors provides novel data collection possibilities, making point cloud surveys accessible to many new users like construction contractors; this study evaluates the suitability of an Apple LiDAR sensor. In addition to a controlled office experiment for apprising different surveying approaches, surveys were conducted at three construction sites. Accuracy estimates generally in the range of 2…5 cm were obtained. Furthermore, the outer diameters of over 200 mm pipes and slopes of gravity flow pipelines could also be determined relatively reliably. Compared to conventional total station surveys or terrestrial laser scanning, which is employed for validation, the low-cost LiDAR surveys are also significantly faster, taking only a few minutes when utility networks span up to 100 m2. It is concluded that Apple LiDAR sensors could mitigate problems associated with fast-paced construction schedules that typically hinder underground utility networks’ surveys by allowing quick and operational data collection before trench backfilling. Practical tests demonstrate that contractors can conduct such surveys independently after training.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信