The role of dual purpose in retailer’s store brand introduction and quality strategies within a supply chain

IF 8.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Mingyou Meng, Shiming Deng, Pin Zhou, He Xu
{"title":"The role of dual purpose in retailer’s store brand introduction and quality strategies within a supply chain","authors":"Mingyou Meng, Shiming Deng, Pin Zhou, He Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To address stakeholders’ interests, firms increasingly adopt a dual-purpose agenda, typically involving the pursuit of profits and consumer surplus (CS). This study considers a supply chain dynamic involving a retailer and a national brand (NB) manufacturer, both potentially pursuing dual purposes, to investigate how their dual-purpose nature influences the introduction and quality strategies of the retailer’s store brand (SB). Our findings show that only the retailer pursuing CS has no impact on SB quality. However, if the NB manufacturer pursues CS, SB quality declines irrespective of the retailer’s stance. Interestingly, the for-profit retailer experiences reduced profits from SB introduction when also pursuing CS and expressing a high interest in it. Conversely, SB introduction enhances the dual-purpose manufacturer’s utility when its interest in CS is relatively high. The introduction of SB may lead to unintended price and payoff implications, with the manufacturer’s profit and the wholesale price exhibiting non-monotonic relationships with its interest in CS. Consequently, compared to the for-profit scenario, this may elevate the wholesale price, exacerbating the double marginalization effect. Additionally, when the retailer pursues CS, supply chain profit may increase because of the mitigated double marginalization effect, resulting from an unconventional reduction in retail markup rather than wholesale price. Our findings suggest that manufacturers pursuing CS could strategically alleviate profit losses stemming from retailers’ SB introduction. However, retailers should exercise caution when simultaneously introducing a SB and pursuing CS from a profitability standpoint.","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103912","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To address stakeholders’ interests, firms increasingly adopt a dual-purpose agenda, typically involving the pursuit of profits and consumer surplus (CS). This study considers a supply chain dynamic involving a retailer and a national brand (NB) manufacturer, both potentially pursuing dual purposes, to investigate how their dual-purpose nature influences the introduction and quality strategies of the retailer’s store brand (SB). Our findings show that only the retailer pursuing CS has no impact on SB quality. However, if the NB manufacturer pursues CS, SB quality declines irrespective of the retailer’s stance. Interestingly, the for-profit retailer experiences reduced profits from SB introduction when also pursuing CS and expressing a high interest in it. Conversely, SB introduction enhances the dual-purpose manufacturer’s utility when its interest in CS is relatively high. The introduction of SB may lead to unintended price and payoff implications, with the manufacturer’s profit and the wholesale price exhibiting non-monotonic relationships with its interest in CS. Consequently, compared to the for-profit scenario, this may elevate the wholesale price, exacerbating the double marginalization effect. Additionally, when the retailer pursues CS, supply chain profit may increase because of the mitigated double marginalization effect, resulting from an unconventional reduction in retail markup rather than wholesale price. Our findings suggest that manufacturers pursuing CS could strategically alleviate profit losses stemming from retailers’ SB introduction. However, retailers should exercise caution when simultaneously introducing a SB and pursuing CS from a profitability standpoint.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信