Exploring the ethics of using fictional stories for health education on social media to share information and emotions about the HPV vaccine: A cross-sectional study with interdisciplinary health experts

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Philip M. Massey , Regan M. Murray , Kelli Kostizak , Wen-Juo Lo , Michael Yudell
{"title":"Exploring the ethics of using fictional stories for health education on social media to share information and emotions about the HPV vaccine: A cross-sectional study with interdisciplinary health experts","authors":"Philip M. Massey ,&nbsp;Regan M. Murray ,&nbsp;Kelli Kostizak ,&nbsp;Wen-Juo Lo ,&nbsp;Michael Yudell","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social media is used to promote the HPV vaccine through various strategies, including the use of stories and narratives. Understanding the ethical concerns related to the use of social media in this capacity are important. The purpose of this study is to identify ethical concerns of using fictional stories to share information and emotions about the HPV vaccine on social media, ultimately to influence parents on their decision to vaccinate their child. <u>Methods:</u> We conducted a cross-sectional survey with researchers in the fields of health communication, cancer prevention, social media, and public health ethics from October to December 2021. Respondents were presented with a fictional story that consisted of seven connected vignettes about the HPV vaccine. For each vignette, respondents were asked to rate the potential benefits and risk, as well as the potential for ethical concerns of using the fictional narrative style to share information about the HPV vaccine. Descriptive statistics summarized responses, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. <u>Results:</u> On average, respondents (<em>n</em> = 41) perceived more benefits than risks when it comes to 1) using social media for health education generally and 2) using a story with connected vignettes for vaccine communication. The vignettes prioritizing vaccine hesitancy, positive emotion, and health equity were seen as having the most potential benefit, while the vignettes highlighting vaccine confidence and skepticism were seen as having the most potential risk. Overall, respondents felt there were several ethical concerns of note – persuasion was the most common (15 % of respondents) followed by deception (9 %) and manipulation (8 %). Qualitative data highlighted the importance of transparency and trust to avoid ethical violations and negative outcomes. <u>Conclusions:</u> Ethical concerns exist when using fictional stories to share health information on social media, particularly as new online technologies make it harder to tell fact from fiction. Practical and actionable recommendations for researchers must be developed, defining a range of ethical responsibilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 126575"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X2401257X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media is used to promote the HPV vaccine through various strategies, including the use of stories and narratives. Understanding the ethical concerns related to the use of social media in this capacity are important. The purpose of this study is to identify ethical concerns of using fictional stories to share information and emotions about the HPV vaccine on social media, ultimately to influence parents on their decision to vaccinate their child. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey with researchers in the fields of health communication, cancer prevention, social media, and public health ethics from October to December 2021. Respondents were presented with a fictional story that consisted of seven connected vignettes about the HPV vaccine. For each vignette, respondents were asked to rate the potential benefits and risk, as well as the potential for ethical concerns of using the fictional narrative style to share information about the HPV vaccine. Descriptive statistics summarized responses, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Results: On average, respondents (n = 41) perceived more benefits than risks when it comes to 1) using social media for health education generally and 2) using a story with connected vignettes for vaccine communication. The vignettes prioritizing vaccine hesitancy, positive emotion, and health equity were seen as having the most potential benefit, while the vignettes highlighting vaccine confidence and skepticism were seen as having the most potential risk. Overall, respondents felt there were several ethical concerns of note – persuasion was the most common (15 % of respondents) followed by deception (9 %) and manipulation (8 %). Qualitative data highlighted the importance of transparency and trust to avoid ethical violations and negative outcomes. Conclusions: Ethical concerns exist when using fictional stories to share health information on social media, particularly as new online technologies make it harder to tell fact from fiction. Practical and actionable recommendations for researchers must be developed, defining a range of ethical responsibilities.
探索在社交媒体上使用虚构故事进行健康教育的伦理,以分享有关HPV疫苗的信息和情感:与跨学科卫生专家的横断面研究。
社交媒体被用来通过各种策略来推广HPV疫苗,包括使用故事和叙述。了解在这种情况下使用社交媒体的伦理问题是很重要的。本研究的目的是确定使用虚构故事在社交媒体上分享有关HPV疫苗的信息和情绪的伦理问题,最终影响父母为孩子接种疫苗的决定。方法:我们于2021年10 - 12月对健康传播、癌症预防、社交媒体和公共卫生伦理等领域的研究人员进行了横断面调查。受访者被呈现了一个虚构的故事,由七个有关HPV疫苗的相互关联的小插曲组成。对于每个小插曲,受访者被要求评估潜在的好处和风险,以及使用虚构的叙事风格来分享有关HPV疫苗的信息的潜在伦理问题。描述性统计汇总反应,定性数据进行主题分析。结果:平均而言,受访者(n = 41)在以下方面认为益处大于风险:1)一般使用社交媒体进行健康教育;2)使用带有相关小片段的故事进行疫苗传播。优先考虑疫苗犹豫、积极情绪和健康公平的小插曲被认为具有最大的潜在益处,而强调疫苗信心和怀疑的小插曲被认为具有最大的潜在风险。总的来说,受访者认为有几个值得注意的道德问题——说服是最常见的(15%的受访者),其次是欺骗(9%)和操纵(8%)。定性数据强调了透明度和信任对避免违反道德和负面后果的重要性。结论:在社交媒体上使用虚构故事分享健康信息时存在伦理问题,特别是在新的在线技术使事实与虚构更难区分的情况下。必须为研究人员制定切实可行的建议,确定一系列伦理责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信