Psychosocial risks and resources at work and employee wellbeing in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: time series of cross-sections.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000003301

Jenni Ervasti, Jaakko Airaksinen, Jaana Pentti, Johanna Kausto, Matti Joensuu, Tuula Oksanen, Mika Kivimäki, Jussi Vahtera

{"title":"Psychosocial risks and resources at work and employee wellbeing in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: time series of cross-sections.","authors":"Jenni Ervasti, Jaakko Airaksinen, Jaana Pentti, Johanna Kausto, Matti Joensuu, Tuula Oksanen, Mika Kivimäki, Jussi Vahtera","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We examined the relationships between psychosocial factors and employee wellbeing in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: Survey data were from Finnish public sector employees from 2018 (T1 = before), 2020 (T2 = during), and 2022 (T3 = after the pandemic) (n = 29,360). Employee wellbeing was measured with self-rated health, work ability, and recovery from work. The generalized linear models using Poisson distribution were adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, obesity, and health behaviors.Results: Psychosocial factors were associated with suboptimal employee wellbeing in every timepoint. The association between high effort-reward imbalance and suboptimal work ability was strongest during the pandemic (risk ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.47-1.59). The association between high job strain and suboptimal recovery from work was stronger during the pandemic (1.49, 1.46-1.52) than post-pandemic (1.45, 1.43-1.48).Conclusions: Job stress had the strongest associations with suboptimal wellbeing during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We examined the relationships between psychosocial factors and employee wellbeing in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Survey data were from Finnish public sector employees from 2018 (T1 = before), 2020 (T2 = during), and 2022 (T3 = after the pandemic) (n = 29,360). Employee wellbeing was measured with self-rated health, work ability, and recovery from work. The generalized linear models using Poisson distribution were adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, obesity, and health behaviors.

Results: Psychosocial factors were associated with suboptimal employee wellbeing in every timepoint. The association between high effort-reward imbalance and suboptimal work ability was strongest during the pandemic (risk ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.47-1.59). The association between high job strain and suboptimal recovery from work was stronger during the pandemic (1.49, 1.46-1.52) than post-pandemic (1.45, 1.43-1.48).

Conclusions: Job stress had the strongest associations with suboptimal wellbeing during the pandemic.

查看原文本刊更多论文

2019冠状病毒病大流行背景下工作中的社会心理风险和资源以及员工福祉：横截面时间序列

目的：探讨新冠肺炎大流行背景下社会心理因素与员工幸福感的关系。方法：调查数据来自2018年（T1 =疫情前）、2020年（T2 =疫情期间）和2022年（T3 =疫情后）的芬兰公共部门雇员（n = 29360）。员工的幸福感是通过自我评估的健康状况、工作能力和工作恢复来衡量的。使用泊松分布的广义线性模型对年龄、性别、社会经济地位、肥胖和健康行为进行了调整。结果：心理社会因素与各时间点员工幸福感次优相关。在大流行期间，高度努力-奖励不平衡与次优工作能力之间的相关性最强（风险比1.53,95%置信区间1.47-1.59）。大流行期间，高工作压力与工作恢复不佳之间的关联（1.49,1.46-1.52）强于大流行后（1.45,1.43-1.48）。结论：在大流行期间，工作压力与次优幸福感有最强烈的关联。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine

自引率

0.00%

发文量