Kivanc Dulger Asst. Prof., Tugba Kosar Asst. Prof.
{"title":"Comparison of three dentine replacement materials in terms of different characteristics","authors":"Kivanc Dulger Asst. Prof., Tugba Kosar Asst. Prof.","doi":"10.1111/aej.12908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This in vitro study evaluated three dentine replacement materials: Biodentine, Ketac Molar and TheraBaseCa. Specimens of each material (<i>n</i> = 19) were prepared for investigations of hardness, calcium release, pH and water sorption–solubility. SEM and EDX analysis were also used for these investigations. One-way ANOVA and robust ANOVA tests were used for normally and non-normally distributed data for statistical analysis, respectively. TheraBaseCa showed the lowest hardness (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while Biodentine had the highest pH and calcium release (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Significant differences in water sorption–solubility were observed as Biodentine>Ketac Molar>TheraBaseCa (<i>p</i> < 0.001). SEM and EDX revealed that Biodentine had a crystalline structure with O, Ca, C, Si and Bi; Ketac Molar had a particulate matrix with O, C, F, Ca, Si and Al; and TheraBaseCa had a matrix with C, O, Si, Yb, Al and Ca. In conclusion, Biodentine was more alkaline and released more calcium, while TheraBaseCa had the lowest water sorption—solubility over 28 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":55581,"journal":{"name":"Australian Endodontic Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":"81-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.12908","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This in vitro study evaluated three dentine replacement materials: Biodentine, Ketac Molar and TheraBaseCa. Specimens of each material (n = 19) were prepared for investigations of hardness, calcium release, pH and water sorption–solubility. SEM and EDX analysis were also used for these investigations. One-way ANOVA and robust ANOVA tests were used for normally and non-normally distributed data for statistical analysis, respectively. TheraBaseCa showed the lowest hardness (p < 0.001), while Biodentine had the highest pH and calcium release (p < 0.001). Significant differences in water sorption–solubility were observed as Biodentine>Ketac Molar>TheraBaseCa (p < 0.001). SEM and EDX revealed that Biodentine had a crystalline structure with O, Ca, C, Si and Bi; Ketac Molar had a particulate matrix with O, C, F, Ca, Si and Al; and TheraBaseCa had a matrix with C, O, Si, Yb, Al and Ca. In conclusion, Biodentine was more alkaline and released more calcium, while TheraBaseCa had the lowest water sorption—solubility over 28 days.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Endodontic Journal provides a forum for communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for all specialists and dentists with an interest in the morphology, physiology, and pathology of the human tooth, in particular the dental pulp, root and peri-radicular tissues.
The Journal features regular clinical updates, research reports and case reports from authors worldwide, and also publishes meeting abstracts, society news and historical endodontic glimpses.
The Australian Endodontic Journal is a publication for dentists in general and specialist practice devoted solely to endodontics. It aims to promote communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for those dentists who have a special interest in endodontics.