Comparison of the therapeutic effects of different pneumoperitoneum pressures on laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trail.

Acta cirurgica brasileira Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/acb399824
Jie Yao, Shichen Qin, Guang Yang
{"title":"Comparison of the therapeutic effects of different pneumoperitoneum pressures on laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trail.","authors":"Jie Yao, Shichen Qin, Guang Yang","doi":"10.1590/acb399824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the indicators, postoperative pneumoretroperitoneum-related complications, and postoperative recovery of laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair under different CO2 pneumoperitoneum pressures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The total of 187 adult patients with primary inguinal hernia who successfully underwent transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis (TAPP) from September 2021 to September 2023 in the Department of General Surgery, Haimen People's Hospital affiliated to Nantong University, were collected. These patients were randomly divided into low abdominal pressure group (group A: pneumoperitoneum pressure = 8 mmHg), sub-low abdominal pressure group (group B: pneumoperitoneum pressure = 10 mmHg), moderate abdominal pressure group (group C: pneumoperitoneum pressure = 12 mmHg), and standard pressure group (group D: pneumoperitoneum pressure = 14 mmHg), with 40 patients each.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operation time in group C (43.90 ± 9.75) was significantly lower than group A (51.98 ± 12.65, p 0.001), group B (46.70 ± 10.59, p 0.001), and was higher than that in group D without significant statistical differences (38.15 ± 7.98, P = 0.05). The peritoneal suturing time in group C (5.03 ± 1.07) was significantly higher than group A (4.23 ± 0.70, p 0.001), group B (4.55 ± 0.85, p = 0.03), and was significantly lower than that in group D (6.95 ± 1.96, p 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Selecting sub-low abdominal pressure (12 mmHg) can help to have a shorter operation time, with less blood loss, and it did not add pneumoretroperitoneum-related complications. Changing the pneumoperitonium pressure during different phases of the surgery is also an optimal option.</p>","PeriodicalId":93850,"journal":{"name":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","volume":"39 ","pages":"e399824"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb399824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the indicators, postoperative pneumoretroperitoneum-related complications, and postoperative recovery of laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair under different CO2 pneumoperitoneum pressures.

Methods: The total of 187 adult patients with primary inguinal hernia who successfully underwent transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis (TAPP) from September 2021 to September 2023 in the Department of General Surgery, Haimen People's Hospital affiliated to Nantong University, were collected. These patients were randomly divided into low abdominal pressure group (group A: pneumoperitoneum pressure = 8 mmHg), sub-low abdominal pressure group (group B: pneumoperitoneum pressure = 10 mmHg), moderate abdominal pressure group (group C: pneumoperitoneum pressure = 12 mmHg), and standard pressure group (group D: pneumoperitoneum pressure = 14 mmHg), with 40 patients each.

Results: The operation time in group C (43.90 ± 9.75) was significantly lower than group A (51.98 ± 12.65, p 0.001), group B (46.70 ± 10.59, p 0.001), and was higher than that in group D without significant statistical differences (38.15 ± 7.98, P = 0.05). The peritoneal suturing time in group C (5.03 ± 1.07) was significantly higher than group A (4.23 ± 0.70, p 0.001), group B (4.55 ± 0.85, p = 0.03), and was significantly lower than that in group D (6.95 ± 1.96, p 0.001).

Conclusion: Selecting sub-low abdominal pressure (12 mmHg) can help to have a shorter operation time, with less blood loss, and it did not add pneumoretroperitoneum-related complications. Changing the pneumoperitonium pressure during different phases of the surgery is also an optimal option.

不同气腹压力在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的疗效比较:随机对照试验。
目的:比较不同CO2气腹压力下腹腔镜腹股沟前疝修补术的指标、术后气腹膜相关并发症及术后恢复情况。方法:收集2021年9月至2023年9月在南通大学附属海门人民医院普外科成功行经腹腹膜前假体(TAPP)的成人原发性腹股沟疝患者187例。将患者随机分为低腹压组(A组:气腹压力= 8 mmHg)、亚低腹压组(B组:气腹压力= 10 mmHg)、中腹压组(C组:气腹压力= 12 mmHg)和标准压力组(D组:气腹压力= 14 mmHg),每组40例。结果:C组手术时间(43.90±9.75)明显低于A组(51.98±12.65,p 0.001)、B组(46.70±10.59,p 0.001),高于D组(38.15±7.98,p = 0.05),差异无统计学意义。C组腹膜缝合时间(5.03±1.07)显著高于A组(4.23±0.70,p 0.001)、B组(4.55±0.85,p = 0.03),显著低于D组(6.95±1.96,p 0.001)。结论:选择低腹压(12 mmHg)可缩短手术时间,减少出血量,且不增加腹膜相关并发症。在手术的不同阶段改变气腹膜压力也是一个最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信