Knowledge and perceptions of blood donors of the Western Cape Blood Services, South Africa, toward vaginal sample donation for biobanking.

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in reproductive health Pub Date : 2024-11-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frph.2024.1446809
Shantelle Claassen-Weitz, Brian Kullin, Elloise du Toit, Sugnet Gardner-Lubbe, Jo-Ann S Passmore, Heather Jaspan, Anna-Ursula Happel, Greg Bellairs, Caroline Hilton, Anika Chicken, Kirsten Welp, Hannah Livingstone, Adrian Brink
{"title":"Knowledge and perceptions of blood donors of the Western Cape Blood Services, South Africa, toward vaginal sample donation for biobanking.","authors":"Shantelle Claassen-Weitz, Brian Kullin, Elloise du Toit, Sugnet Gardner-Lubbe, Jo-Ann S Passmore, Heather Jaspan, Anna-Ursula Happel, Greg Bellairs, Caroline Hilton, Anika Chicken, Kirsten Welp, Hannah Livingstone, Adrian Brink","doi":"10.3389/frph.2024.1446809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Depletion of <i>Lactobacillus</i> species and an overgrowth of anaerobes in the vaginal tract bacterial vaginosis (BV)], is associated with non-optimal reproductive health outcomes, and increased susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections (STIs). BV is currently treated with antibiotics, although these provide suboptimal cure levels and high recurrence rates. Vaginal microbiota transplantation (VMT), the transfer of vaginal fluid from healthy donors with an optimal vaginal microbiota to a recipient with BV, has been proposed as an alternative treatment strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, we investigated knowledge and perceptions of blood donors to the concept of an optimal vaginal microbiome and VMT via the Western Cape Blood Service (WCBS) clinics in Cape Town, South Africa, by a self-administered questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results & discussion: </strong>Analysis of responses from 106 eligible women showed that 86% (91/106) would consider donating samples. Responses significantly associated with willingness to donate vaginal samples included: (1) belief that helping others outweighs the inconvenience of donating vaginal sample (<i>p</i> = 1.093e<sup>-05</sup>) and (2) prior knowledge of the concept of a healthy vaginal microbiome (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Most potential donors (59/91; 65%) were willing to receive a VMT themselves if needed. Participants who were unwilling to donate vaginal samples (15/106; 14%) indicated that vaginal sample collection would be unpleasant and/or embarrassing. The benefits of a collaboration with WCBS for this project include the naturally altruistic nature of blood donors, the constant in-flow of donors to WCBS clinics, and the infrastructure and logistical aspects in place. Data from this observational study highlight factors affecting the willingness of blood donors to become vaginal sample donors.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1446809"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2024.1446809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Depletion of Lactobacillus species and an overgrowth of anaerobes in the vaginal tract bacterial vaginosis (BV)], is associated with non-optimal reproductive health outcomes, and increased susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections (STIs). BV is currently treated with antibiotics, although these provide suboptimal cure levels and high recurrence rates. Vaginal microbiota transplantation (VMT), the transfer of vaginal fluid from healthy donors with an optimal vaginal microbiota to a recipient with BV, has been proposed as an alternative treatment strategy.

Methods: Here, we investigated knowledge and perceptions of blood donors to the concept of an optimal vaginal microbiome and VMT via the Western Cape Blood Service (WCBS) clinics in Cape Town, South Africa, by a self-administered questionnaire.

Results & discussion: Analysis of responses from 106 eligible women showed that 86% (91/106) would consider donating samples. Responses significantly associated with willingness to donate vaginal samples included: (1) belief that helping others outweighs the inconvenience of donating vaginal sample (p = 1.093e-05) and (2) prior knowledge of the concept of a healthy vaginal microbiome (p = 0.001). Most potential donors (59/91; 65%) were willing to receive a VMT themselves if needed. Participants who were unwilling to donate vaginal samples (15/106; 14%) indicated that vaginal sample collection would be unpleasant and/or embarrassing. The benefits of a collaboration with WCBS for this project include the naturally altruistic nature of blood donors, the constant in-flow of donors to WCBS clinics, and the infrastructure and logistical aspects in place. Data from this observational study highlight factors affecting the willingness of blood donors to become vaginal sample donors.

西开普省血液服务中心献血者的知识和观念,南非,对阴道样本捐献的生物银行。
摘要:阴道细菌性阴道病(BV)中乳酸菌种类的减少和厌氧菌的过度生长与非最佳生殖健康结果和性传播感染(STIs)易感性增加有关。细菌性阴道炎目前用抗生素治疗,尽管这些药物治愈率不理想且复发率高。阴道微生物群移植(VMT),将阴道液从具有最佳阴道微生物群的健康供体转移到BV受体,已被提出作为一种替代治疗策略。方法:在这里,我们通过南非开普敦的西开普血液服务(WCBS)诊所,通过自我管理的问卷调查了献血者对最佳阴道微生物组和VMT概念的知识和看法。结果与讨论:对106名符合条件的女性的反馈进行分析,86%(91/106)的女性会考虑捐献样本。与捐献阴道样本意愿显著相关的回答包括:(1)相信帮助他人比捐赠阴道样本带来的不便更重要(p = 1.093e-05);(2)事先了解健康阴道微生物群的概念(p = 0.001)。大多数潜在捐助者(59/91;65%)愿意在必要时自己接受车辆行驶里程测试。不愿意捐献阴道样本的参与者(15/106;14%)表示阴道样本采集会令人不愉快和/或尴尬。与世界卫生组织合作开展这一项目的好处包括献血者天生的利他性,不断有献血者流入世界卫生组织的诊所,以及基础设施和后勤方面的到位。这项观察性研究的数据强调了影响献血者成为阴道样本献血者意愿的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信