Does Annulus Fibrosus Lamellar Adhesion Testing Require Preconditioning?

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Sabrina I Sinopoli, Mitchel C Whittal, K Josh Briar, Diane E Gregory
{"title":"Does Annulus Fibrosus Lamellar Adhesion Testing Require Preconditioning?","authors":"Sabrina I Sinopoli, Mitchel C Whittal, K Josh Briar, Diane E Gregory","doi":"10.1115/1.4067399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The interlamellar matrix (ILM), located between the annular layers of the intervertebral disc (IVD), is an adhesive component which acts to resist delamination. Investigating the mechanical properties of the ILM can provide us with valuable information regarding risk of disc injury; however given its viscoelastic nature, it may be necessary to conduct preconditioning on tissue samples before measuring these ILM properties. Therefore, the aim of this study was to optimize mechanical testing protocols of the ILM by examining the effect of preconditioning on stiffness and strength of this adhesive matrix. Eighty-eight annular samples were dissected from 22 porcine cervical discs and randomized into one of four testing conditions consisting of ten cycles of 15% strain followed by a 180 deg adhesive peel test. The four testing groups employed a different strain rate for the ten cycles of preconditioning: 0.01 mm/s (n = 23); 0.1 mm/s (n = 26); 1 mm/s (n = 23); and no preconditioning employed (n = 16). Samples preconditioned at 0.01 mm/s were significantly less stiff than those that had not received preconditioning (p = 0.014). No other results were found to be statistically significant. Given the lack of differences observed in this study, preconditioning is likely not necessary prior to conducting a 180 deg peel test. However, if preconditioning is employed, the findings from this study suggest avoiding preconditioning conducted at very slow rates (i.e., 0.01 mm/s) as the long testing time may negatively affect the tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4067399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interlamellar matrix (ILM), located between the annular layers of the intervertebral disc (IVD), is an adhesive component which acts to resist delamination. Investigating the mechanical properties of the ILM can provide us with valuable information regarding risk of disc injury; however given its viscoelastic nature, it may be necessary to conduct preconditioning on tissue samples before measuring these ILM properties. Therefore, the aim of this study was to optimize mechanical testing protocols of the ILM by examining the effect of preconditioning on stiffness and strength of this adhesive matrix. Eighty-eight annular samples were dissected from 22 porcine cervical discs and randomized into one of four testing conditions consisting of ten cycles of 15% strain followed by a 180 deg adhesive peel test. The four testing groups employed a different strain rate for the ten cycles of preconditioning: 0.01 mm/s (n = 23); 0.1 mm/s (n = 26); 1 mm/s (n = 23); and no preconditioning employed (n = 16). Samples preconditioned at 0.01 mm/s were significantly less stiff than those that had not received preconditioning (p = 0.014). No other results were found to be statistically significant. Given the lack of differences observed in this study, preconditioning is likely not necessary prior to conducting a 180 deg peel test. However, if preconditioning is employed, the findings from this study suggest avoiding preconditioning conducted at very slow rates (i.e., 0.01 mm/s) as the long testing time may negatively affect the tissue.

纤维环板层粘连测试需要预处理吗?
层间基质(ILM)位于椎间盘环状层之间,是一种粘附成分,可抵抗剥离。研究内膜的力学特性可以为我们提供有关椎间盘损伤风险的宝贵信息;然而,鉴于其粘弹性性质,在测量这些ILM特性之前,可能有必要对组织样品进行预处理。因此,本研究的目的是通过检查预处理对黏合剂基质刚度和强度的影响来优化ILM的力学测试方案。从22只猪颈椎间盘中解剖88个环状样本,随机分为4个测试条件之一,包括10个循环15%应变,然后进行180°粘接剥离试验。4个试验组采用不同的应变速率预处理10个循环:0.01 mm/s (n=23);0.1 mm/s (n=26);1 mm/s (n=23);未使用预处理(n=16)。预处理速度为0.01 mm/s的样品比未预处理的样品僵硬度明显降低(p=0.014)。没有发现其他结果具有统计学意义。鉴于本研究中观察到的差异不足,预处理可能不需要在进行180°剥离试验之前进行。然而,如果采用预处理,本研究的结果建议避免以非常慢的速率(即0.01 mm/s)进行预处理,因为长时间的测试可能会对组织产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信