Correlation analysis and recurrence evaluation system for patients with recurrent hepatolithiasis: a multicentre retrospective study.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2024-11-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1510674
Zihan Li, Yibo Zhang, Zixiang Chen, Jiangming Chen, Hui Hou, Cheng Wang, Zheng Lu, Xiaoming Wang, Xiaoping Geng, Fubao Liu
{"title":"Correlation analysis and recurrence evaluation system for patients with recurrent hepatolithiasis: a multicentre retrospective study.","authors":"Zihan Li, Yibo Zhang, Zixiang Chen, Jiangming Chen, Hui Hou, Cheng Wang, Zheng Lu, Xiaoming Wang, Xiaoping Geng, Fubao Liu","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1510674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Methods for accurately predicting the prognosis of patients with recurrent hepatolithiasis (RH) after biliary surgery are lacking. This study aimed to develop a model that dynamically predicts the risk of hepatolithiasis recurrence using a machine-learning (ML) approach based on multiple clinical high-order correlation data.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data from patients with RH who underwent surgery at five centres between January 2015 and December 2020 were collected and divided into training and testing sets. Nine predictive models, which we named the Correlation Analysis and Recurrence Evaluation System (CARES), were developed and compared using machine learning (ML) methods to predict the patients' dynamic recurrence risk within 5 post-operative years. We adopted a k-fold cross validation with k = 10 and tested model performance on a separate testing set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the performance of the models, and the significance and direction of each predictive variable were interpreted and justified based on Shapley Additive Explanations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Models based on ML methods outperformed those based on traditional regression analysis in predicting the recurrent risk of patients with RH, with Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) showing the best performance, both yielding an AUC (Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve) of∼0.9 or higher at predictions. These models were proved to have even better performance on testing sets than in a 10-fold cross validation, indicating that the model was not overfitted. The SHAP method revealed that immediate stone clearance, final stone clearance, number of previous surgeries, and preoperative CA19-9 index were the most important predictors of recurrence after reoperation in RH patients. An online version of the CARES model was implemented.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CARES model was firstly developed based on ML methods and further encapsulated into an online version for predicting the recurrence of patients with RH after hepatectomy, which can guide clinical decision-making and personalised postoperative surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1510674"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631919/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1510674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Methods for accurately predicting the prognosis of patients with recurrent hepatolithiasis (RH) after biliary surgery are lacking. This study aimed to develop a model that dynamically predicts the risk of hepatolithiasis recurrence using a machine-learning (ML) approach based on multiple clinical high-order correlation data.

Materials and methods: Data from patients with RH who underwent surgery at five centres between January 2015 and December 2020 were collected and divided into training and testing sets. Nine predictive models, which we named the Correlation Analysis and Recurrence Evaluation System (CARES), were developed and compared using machine learning (ML) methods to predict the patients' dynamic recurrence risk within 5 post-operative years. We adopted a k-fold cross validation with k = 10 and tested model performance on a separate testing set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the performance of the models, and the significance and direction of each predictive variable were interpreted and justified based on Shapley Additive Explanations.

Results: Models based on ML methods outperformed those based on traditional regression analysis in predicting the recurrent risk of patients with RH, with Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) showing the best performance, both yielding an AUC (Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve) of∼0.9 or higher at predictions. These models were proved to have even better performance on testing sets than in a 10-fold cross validation, indicating that the model was not overfitted. The SHAP method revealed that immediate stone clearance, final stone clearance, number of previous surgeries, and preoperative CA19-9 index were the most important predictors of recurrence after reoperation in RH patients. An online version of the CARES model was implemented.

Conclusion: The CARES model was firstly developed based on ML methods and further encapsulated into an online version for predicting the recurrence of patients with RH after hepatectomy, which can guide clinical decision-making and personalised postoperative surveillance.

复发性肝内胆管结石患者的相关性分析及复发评价体系:一项多中心回顾性研究。
背景:目前缺乏准确预测胆道手术后复发性肝内胆管结石(RH)患者预后的方法。本研究旨在开发一种基于多个临床高阶相关数据的机器学习(ML)方法动态预测肝内胆管结石复发风险的模型。材料和方法:收集2015年1月至2020年12月期间在五个中心接受手术的RH患者的数据,并将其分为训练组和测试组。我们建立了9个预测模型,我们将其命名为相关性分析和复发评估系统(CARES),并使用机器学习(ML)方法进行比较,以预测患者术后5年内的动态复发风险。我们采用k = 10的k-fold交叉验证,并在单独的测试集上测试模型性能。采用受试者工作特征曲线下的面积来评价模型的性能,并根据Shapley加性解释对各预测变量的显著性和方向进行解释和论证。结果:基于ML方法的模型在预测RH患者复发风险方面优于基于传统回归分析的模型,其中极端梯度增强(XGBoost)和光梯度增强机(LightGBM)表现出最好的性能,两者在预测时的AUC(受试者工作特征曲线下面积)均为~ 0.9或更高。这些模型被证明在测试集上比在10倍交叉验证中具有更好的性能,表明模型没有过拟合。SHAP方法显示,即时结石清除率、最终结石清除率、既往手术次数和术前CA19-9指数是RH患者再手术后复发的最重要预测因素。实施了CARES模型的在线版本。结论:首先基于ML方法建立CARES模型,并将其压缩为在线模型,用于预测RH肝切除术后患者的复发,可指导临床决策和个性化术后监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信