{"title":"The Turkish Version of the Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment: Validity and Reliability in Chronic Stroke Survivors.","authors":"Nurten Bilgin, Gokcen Akyurek","doi":"10.1097/WNN.0000000000000382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of sensory functions in chronic stroke survivors is essential to plan and implement effective treatment and rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (rNSA-T) in chronic stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied the World Health Organization's translation protocols to develop the rNAS-T. We then tested its validity and reliability in 85 chronic stroke survivors using criterion validity and consistency for demographic variables, as well as test-retest and inter-rater reliability analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The criterion validity of the rNSA-T was supported by significant correlation between participants' scores on the rNSA-T, the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz-AD) (r = 0.430-0.674, P < 0.05), and the Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) (r = 0.528-0.773, P < 0.05). rNSA-T results remained consistent across variables of sex and side affected by stroke (P > 0.05). The test-retest reliability of the rNSA-T was excellent in all subdimensions (ICC = 0.865-1.000), as was the inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.875-1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rNSA-T is a valid and reliable tool for evaluation of sensory functions in chronic stroke survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50671,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0000000000000382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Evaluation of sensory functions in chronic stroke survivors is essential to plan and implement effective treatment and rehabilitation.
Objective: To investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (rNSA-T) in chronic stroke survivors.
Methods: We applied the World Health Organization's translation protocols to develop the rNAS-T. We then tested its validity and reliability in 85 chronic stroke survivors using criterion validity and consistency for demographic variables, as well as test-retest and inter-rater reliability analyses.
Results: The criterion validity of the rNSA-T was supported by significant correlation between participants' scores on the rNSA-T, the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz-AD) (r = 0.430-0.674, P < 0.05), and the Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) (r = 0.528-0.773, P < 0.05). rNSA-T results remained consistent across variables of sex and side affected by stroke (P > 0.05). The test-retest reliability of the rNSA-T was excellent in all subdimensions (ICC = 0.865-1.000), as was the inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.875-1.000).
Conclusion: The rNSA-T is a valid and reliable tool for evaluation of sensory functions in chronic stroke survivors.
期刊介绍：
Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology (CBN) is a forum for advances in the neurologic understanding and possible treatment of human disorders that affect thinking, learning, memory, communication, and behavior. As an incubator for innovations in these fields, CBN helps transform theory into practice. The journal serves clinical research, patient care, education, and professional advancement.
The journal welcomes contributions from neurology, cognitive neuroscience, neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry, and other relevant fields. The editors particularly encourage review articles (including reviews of clinical practice), experimental and observational case reports, instructional articles for interested students and professionals in other fields, and innovative articles that do not fit neatly into any category. Also welcome are therapeutic trials and other experimental and observational studies, brief reports, first-person accounts of neurologic experiences, position papers, hypotheses, opinion papers, commentaries, historical perspectives, and book reviews.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
