Percepción y conocimiento de la enfermedad hemorroidal en los profesionales sanitarios en España

IF 0.9 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
M. Frías Vargas , N. Fontanillas Gamilla , I. Rivera Panizo , D. Fuertes Domínguez , C. Granja Ortega , J.F. Peiró Morant , en nombre del Grupo de Trabajo de Vasculopatías y de Aparato Digestivo de SEMERGEN
{"title":"Percepción y conocimiento de la enfermedad hemorroidal en los profesionales sanitarios en España","authors":"M. Frías Vargas ,&nbsp;N. Fontanillas Gamilla ,&nbsp;I. Rivera Panizo ,&nbsp;D. Fuertes Domínguez ,&nbsp;C. Granja Ortega ,&nbsp;J.F. Peiró Morant ,&nbsp;en nombre del Grupo de Trabajo de Vasculopatías y de Aparato Digestivo de SEMERGEN","doi":"10.1016/j.semerg.2024.102393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a public health problem in our clinics and in the quality of life of patients, therefore it is necessary to analyze the actions in the management of HD by healthcare professionals in Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study with data collection through a 28-question survey using a Google® form. 240 surveys were received. Quantitative variables were represented with means and standard deviation and qualitative variables with percentages.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two hundred and forty surveys were analyzed. Sixty-five percent of respondents were women, with a mean age of 48<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12<!--> <!-->years. Ninety-three percent of the professionals had 21-30<!--> <!-->years of clinical experience, with more than 70% being family physicians. Fifty-nine percent considered that HD is adequately diagnosed in primary care, but there was a negative impact on follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic, as 90% considered it inadequate. Forty-two percent of participants were not familiar with the Goligher classification, while 20% knew it and used it in their practice. The most commonly prescribed combination was the use of topical corticosteroids, bulk-forming laxatives, phlebotonics or venoactive drugs, and non-pharmacological measures (12.1%), with diosmin/hesperidin being the most prescribed venoactive agent (63%). Thirty-nine point six percent stated that HD is undertreated. Eighty-nine percent of physicians acknowledged not using any algorithm or protocol for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of HD in their practice, and 89% stated that they were not trained in their workplaces. Seventy-five percent of doctors believed that one of the main limitations hindering the follow-up of the disease was the lack of time during consultations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Approximately 3 out of 5 professionals believe they adequately manage HD, and only 1 out of 5 respondents acknowledge knowing and using the Goligher classification in their clinical practice. Furthermore, 2 out of 5 assert that HD is undertreated in primary care. The prescription patterns for HD are heterogeneous, involving multiple combinations. The vast majority of professionals do not follow any established protocol for managing the disease. The survey highlights the need for training our professionals in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of HD to ensure that our patients receive the highest possible quality of healthcare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53212,"journal":{"name":"Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN","volume":"51 3","pages":"Article 102393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S113835932400203X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a public health problem in our clinics and in the quality of life of patients, therefore it is necessary to analyze the actions in the management of HD by healthcare professionals in Spain.

Material and methods

Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study with data collection through a 28-question survey using a Google® form. 240 surveys were received. Quantitative variables were represented with means and standard deviation and qualitative variables with percentages.

Results

Two hundred and forty surveys were analyzed. Sixty-five percent of respondents were women, with a mean age of 48 ± 12 years. Ninety-three percent of the professionals had 21-30 years of clinical experience, with more than 70% being family physicians. Fifty-nine percent considered that HD is adequately diagnosed in primary care, but there was a negative impact on follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic, as 90% considered it inadequate. Forty-two percent of participants were not familiar with the Goligher classification, while 20% knew it and used it in their practice. The most commonly prescribed combination was the use of topical corticosteroids, bulk-forming laxatives, phlebotonics or venoactive drugs, and non-pharmacological measures (12.1%), with diosmin/hesperidin being the most prescribed venoactive agent (63%). Thirty-nine point six percent stated that HD is undertreated. Eighty-nine percent of physicians acknowledged not using any algorithm or protocol for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of HD in their practice, and 89% stated that they were not trained in their workplaces. Seventy-five percent of doctors believed that one of the main limitations hindering the follow-up of the disease was the lack of time during consultations.

Conclusions

Approximately 3 out of 5 professionals believe they adequately manage HD, and only 1 out of 5 respondents acknowledge knowing and using the Goligher classification in their clinical practice. Furthermore, 2 out of 5 assert that HD is undertreated in primary care. The prescription patterns for HD are heterogeneous, involving multiple combinations. The vast majority of professionals do not follow any established protocol for managing the disease. The survey highlights the need for training our professionals in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of HD to ensure that our patients receive the highest possible quality of healthcare.
[西班牙卫生保健专业人员对痔疮疾病的认知和知识]。
简介:痔疮病(HD)是我们诊所和患者生活质量的公共卫生问题,因此有必要分析西班牙卫生保健专业人员在HD管理中的行动。材料和方法:观察性、描述性和横断面研究,通过使用谷歌®表格收集28个问题的调查数据。共收到240份调查问卷。定量变量用均值和标准差表示,定性变量用百分比表示。结果:对240份调查进行了分析。65%的受访者为女性,平均年龄48±12岁。93%的专业人员有21-30年的临床经验,其中超过70%是家庭医生。59%的人认为在初级保健中对HD进行了充分的诊断,但在COVID-19大流行期间对随访产生了负面影响,因为90%的人认为诊断不足。42%的参与者不熟悉Goligher分类,而20%的人知道并在实践中使用它。最常见的处方组合是使用外用皮质类固醇、成体泻药、促静脉药或静脉活性药物以及非药物措施(12.1%),其中地奥司明/橙皮苷是处方最多的静脉活性药物(63%)。39.6%的人表示HD未得到充分治疗。89%的医生承认在他们的实践中没有使用任何算法或协议来诊断、治疗和随访HD, 89%的医生表示他们没有在工作场所接受过培训。75%的医生认为,阻碍疾病随访的主要限制之一是咨询期间缺乏时间。结论:大约3 / 5的专业人员认为他们充分管理HD,只有1 / 5的受访者承认在他们的临床实践中知道并使用Goligher分类。此外,五分之二的人认为,HD在初级保健中得不到充分治疗。HD的处方模式是异质性的,涉及多种组合。绝大多数专业人员不遵循任何既定的治疗方案。这项调查强调了对我们的专业人员在HD的诊断、治疗和随访方面进行培训的必要性,以确保我们的患者获得尽可能高质量的医疗保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN
Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
39 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信