Clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy in acetabular dysplastic patients, previously treated with periacetabular osteotomy: a minimum of two-year follow-up data from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry.
Bjarne Mygind-Klavsen, Bent Lund, Torsten Grønbech Nielsen, Martin Lind
{"title":"Clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy in acetabular dysplastic patients, previously treated with periacetabular osteotomy: a minimum of two-year follow-up data from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry.","authors":"Bjarne Mygind-Klavsen, Bent Lund, Torsten Grønbech Nielsen, Martin Lind","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnae015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the treatment of choice in dysplastic acetabulum. Due to continued symptoms, 2-11% of these patients require an additional hip arthroscopy. The purpose of this study was to report clinical outcome after a minimum of 2-year follow-up of additional hip arthroscopy after PAO with data from Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry. Inclusion criteria in the study cohort were PAO surgery resulting in an additional hip arthroscopy procedure. The cohort was evaluated according to the surgical findings and patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) pre-operatively and at 2-year follow-up. A total of 287 patients were included in the study cohort. PROMs improved significantly in all subscales from pre-operatively to 2-year follow-up in the study cohort. According to PROM subscales, 47.8-57.6% and 25.2-38.2% achieved Minimal Clinical Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State, respectively. This study demonstrates, in PAO-treated patients, significant PROM improvements after additional hip arthroscopy. Unfortunately, only ∼50% and 30% achieved Minimal Clinical Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"11 3","pages":"198-203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnae015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the treatment of choice in dysplastic acetabulum. Due to continued symptoms, 2-11% of these patients require an additional hip arthroscopy. The purpose of this study was to report clinical outcome after a minimum of 2-year follow-up of additional hip arthroscopy after PAO with data from Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry. Inclusion criteria in the study cohort were PAO surgery resulting in an additional hip arthroscopy procedure. The cohort was evaluated according to the surgical findings and patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) pre-operatively and at 2-year follow-up. A total of 287 patients were included in the study cohort. PROMs improved significantly in all subscales from pre-operatively to 2-year follow-up in the study cohort. According to PROM subscales, 47.8-57.6% and 25.2-38.2% achieved Minimal Clinical Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State, respectively. This study demonstrates, in PAO-treated patients, significant PROM improvements after additional hip arthroscopy. Unfortunately, only ∼50% and 30% achieved Minimal Clinical Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State, respectively.