{"title":"Reliability of Extraoral Scanners in Capturing 3D Geometry for Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Nasser M Alqahtani","doi":"10.12659/MSM.946470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND This systematic review aimed to evaluate literature on the use and reliability of extraoral facial scanning/extraoral scanning in capturing 3D geometry in association with intraoral evaluation for dental prostheses fabrication. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two independent reviewers performed a systematic database search of PubMed-Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus with MeSH terms (keywords), including \"extraoral Scanner\", \"facial scanner\", \"intraoral scanner\", and \"dental prosthesis\" to identify studies on extraoral facial scanning/extraoral scanning reliability in association with intraoral evaluation measurements (from January 1, 2012 to June 1, 2024). The study was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42024544106) and followed the PRISMA statement. The focused question was \"Does data obtained from extraoral facial scanning/extraoral scanning provide a reliable guideline in association with intraoral evaluation for dental prostheses fabrication?\" The main measure used to assess reliability was the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Risk of bias was assessed using Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT). RESULTS Out of 1066 studies, 8 studies were included based on eligibility criteria. The studies showed that extraoral facial scanning/extraoral scanning captured 3D geometry of tissues with a high ICC, indicating excellent consistency and accuracy. Elevated ICC values (ICC >0.75; range 0.75-0.99) indicated that these systems possess the ability to consistently reproduce facial geometries, which is a critical factor in fabricating precise and comfortable prostheses using intraoral scanners. CONCLUSIONS The study findings support that extraoral facial scanning/extraoral scanning can be combined with intraoral evaluation and digitized workflow to provide high-quality dental prosthetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"30 ","pages":"e946470"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.946470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review aimed to evaluate literature on the use and reliability of extraoral facial scanning/extraoral scanning in capturing 3D geometry in association with intraoral evaluation for dental prostheses fabrication. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two independent reviewers performed a systematic database search of PubMed-Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus with MeSH terms (keywords), including "extraoral Scanner", "facial scanner", "intraoral scanner", and "dental prosthesis" to identify studies on extraoral facial scanning/extraoral scanning reliability in association with intraoral evaluation measurements (from January 1, 2012 to June 1, 2024). The study was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42024544106) and followed the PRISMA statement. The focused question was "Does data obtained from extraoral facial scanning/extraoral scanning provide a reliable guideline in association with intraoral evaluation for dental prostheses fabrication?" The main measure used to assess reliability was the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Risk of bias was assessed using Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT). RESULTS Out of 1066 studies, 8 studies were included based on eligibility criteria. The studies showed that extraoral facial scanning/extraoral scanning captured 3D geometry of tissues with a high ICC, indicating excellent consistency and accuracy. Elevated ICC values (ICC >0.75; range 0.75-0.99) indicated that these systems possess the ability to consistently reproduce facial geometries, which is a critical factor in fabricating precise and comfortable prostheses using intraoral scanners. CONCLUSIONS The study findings support that extraoral facial scanning/extraoral scanning can be combined with intraoral evaluation and digitized workflow to provide high-quality dental prosthetics.
本系统综述旨在评估口腔外面部扫描/口腔外扫描在口腔内评估修复体制作过程中捕获三维几何图形的使用和可靠性的文献。材料与方法两名独立审稿人对PubMed-Medline、Web of Science、Embase和Scopus进行了系统的数据库检索,检索MeSH术语(关键词),包括“口外扫描仪”、“面部扫描仪”、“口内扫描仪”和“牙科假体”,以确定与口内评估测量相关的口外面部扫描/口外扫描可靠性的研究(2012年1月1日至2024年6月1日)。该研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO CRD42024544106)注册,并遵循PRISMA声明。重点问题是“口腔外面部扫描/口腔外扫描获得的数据是否为口腔内评估假体制作提供了可靠的指导?”评估信度的主要措施是类内相关系数(ICC)。使用联合试验报告标准(CONSORT)评估偏倚风险。结果:在1066项研究中,根据入选标准纳入了8项研究。研究表明,口外面部扫描/口外扫描以高ICC捕获组织的三维几何形状,具有良好的一致性和准确性。升高的ICC值(ICC >0.75;范围0.75-0.99)表明这些系统具有持续再现面部几何形状的能力,这是使用口腔内扫描仪制造精确和舒适的假体的关键因素。结论口腔外面部扫描/口腔外扫描可与口腔内评估和数字化工作流程相结合,提供高质量的口腔修复体。
期刊介绍:
Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper.
Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.