Complete hepatic caudate lobe resection: is robotic approach safe? Report from experienced centers.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Greta Donisi, Emanuele Doria, Gemma Bosch, Fernando Burdio, Celine De Meyere, Mathieu D'Hondt, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Rosalinda Filippo, Annarita Libia, Victor Lopez-Lopez, Paolo Magistri, Riccardo Memeo, Patricia Sanchez-Velazquez, Marcello Giuseppe Spampinato, Ricardo Robles-Campos, Iswanto Sucandy, Benedetto Ielpo
{"title":"Complete hepatic caudate lobe resection: is robotic approach safe? Report from experienced centers.","authors":"Greta Donisi, Emanuele Doria, Gemma Bosch, Fernando Burdio, Celine De Meyere, Mathieu D'Hondt, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Rosalinda Filippo, Annarita Libia, Victor Lopez-Lopez, Paolo Magistri, Riccardo Memeo, Patricia Sanchez-Velazquez, Marcello Giuseppe Spampinato, Ricardo Robles-Campos, Iswanto Sucandy, Benedetto Ielpo","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02162-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Minimally invasive liver surgery has become widely accepted as a safe and effective approach, especially with experienced surgeons. Robotic hepatectomy may offer significant benefits in challenging procedures like caudate lobe resection. The caudate lobe's intricate anatomy and deep-seated location make its resection particularly challenging, with limited reports on minimally invasive techniques. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of robotic isolated complete caudectomy and to provide a detailed description of the different technical approaches available. This retrospective multicenter study was conducted across eight experienced hepatobiliary robotic surgery centers between June 2020 and March 2024. All patients who underwent elective RICC during this period were included. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed, focusing on demographics, intraoperative variables, postoperative outcomes, and histopathological results. The primary outcome was the feasibility and safety of the robotic approach. The study included 42 patients. The median (IQR) operative time was 180 (125-245) min, with a median estimated blood loss of 30 (0-100) ml. There were no conversions to open surgery and only one severe complication (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) occurred. No postoperative mortality was observed, and all resections for malignant lesions achieved R0 margins. The median time to flatus was 1 (1-1) day, time to solid diet was 1 (1-2) days, and the median length of stay was 3 (2-4) days. RICC is a feasible and safe procedure, demonstrating significant benefits in operative efficiency and patient recovery. However, further research with larger, prospective multicenter studies is necessary to confirm these findings and assess long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02162-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Minimally invasive liver surgery has become widely accepted as a safe and effective approach, especially with experienced surgeons. Robotic hepatectomy may offer significant benefits in challenging procedures like caudate lobe resection. The caudate lobe's intricate anatomy and deep-seated location make its resection particularly challenging, with limited reports on minimally invasive techniques. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of robotic isolated complete caudectomy and to provide a detailed description of the different technical approaches available. This retrospective multicenter study was conducted across eight experienced hepatobiliary robotic surgery centers between June 2020 and March 2024. All patients who underwent elective RICC during this period were included. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed, focusing on demographics, intraoperative variables, postoperative outcomes, and histopathological results. The primary outcome was the feasibility and safety of the robotic approach. The study included 42 patients. The median (IQR) operative time was 180 (125-245) min, with a median estimated blood loss of 30 (0-100) ml. There were no conversions to open surgery and only one severe complication (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) occurred. No postoperative mortality was observed, and all resections for malignant lesions achieved R0 margins. The median time to flatus was 1 (1-1) day, time to solid diet was 1 (1-2) days, and the median length of stay was 3 (2-4) days. RICC is a feasible and safe procedure, demonstrating significant benefits in operative efficiency and patient recovery. However, further research with larger, prospective multicenter studies is necessary to confirm these findings and assess long-term outcomes.

完全肝尾状叶切除术:机器人入路安全吗?由经验丰富的中心报告。
微创肝脏手术作为一种安全有效的方法已被广泛接受,尤其是在经验丰富的外科医生的指导下。机器人肝切除术可能为尾状叶切除等具有挑战性的手术提供显著的好处。尾状叶复杂的解剖结构和深部位置使其切除特别具有挑战性,微创技术的报道有限。本研究的目的是评估机器人孤立的完全根茎切除术的可行性和安全性,并提供不同技术方法的详细描述。这项回顾性多中心研究于2020年6月至2024年3月在8个经验丰富的肝胆机器人手术中心进行。所有在此期间接受选择性RICC的患者均被纳入研究。前瞻性收集数据并回顾性分析,重点关注人口统计学、术中变量、术后结果和组织病理学结果。主要结果是机器人方法的可行性和安全性。该研究包括42名患者。中位(IQR)手术时间为180(125-245)分钟,中位估计失血量为30 (0-100)ml。没有转开手术,仅发生1例严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo≥3)。术后无死亡率,所有恶性病灶切除均达到R0边缘。平均排气时间为1(1-1)天,平均固体饮食时间为1(1-2)天,平均住院时间为3(2-4)天。RICC是一种可行且安全的手术,在手术效率和患者康复方面具有显著的优势。然而,需要更大规模的前瞻性多中心研究来证实这些发现并评估长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信