Empirical prediction intervals applied to short term mortality forecasts and excess deaths.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ricarda Duerst, Jonas Schöley
{"title":"Empirical prediction intervals applied to short term mortality forecasts and excess deaths.","authors":"Ricarda Duerst, Jonas Schöley","doi":"10.1186/s12963-024-00355-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the winter of 2022/2023, excess death estimates for Germany indicated a 10% elevation, which has led to questions about the significance of this increase in mortality. Given the inherent errors in demographic forecasting, the reliability of estimating a 10% deviation is questionable. This research addresses this issue by analyzing the error distribution in forecasts of weekly deaths. By deriving empirical prediction intervals, we provide a more accurate probabilistic study of weekly expected and excess deaths compared to the use of conventional parametric intervals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using weekly death data from the Short-term Mortality Database (STMF) for 23 countries, we propose empirical prediction intervals based on the distribution of past out-of-sample forecasting errors for the study of weekly expected and excess deaths. Instead of relying on the suitability of parametric assumptions or the magnitude of errors over the fitting period, empirical prediction intervals reflect the intuitive notion that a forecast is only as precise as similar forecasts in the past turned out to be. We compare the probabilistic calibration of empirical skew-normal prediction intervals with conventional parametric prediction intervals from a negative-binomial GAM in an out-of-sample setting. Further, we use the empirical prediction intervals to quantify the probability of detecting 10% excess deaths in a given week, given pre-pandemic mortality trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cross-country analysis shows that the empirical skew-normal prediction intervals are overall better calibrated than the conventional parametric prediction intervals. Further, the choice of prediction interval significantly affects the severity of an excess death estimate. The empirical prediction intervals reveal that the likelihood of exceeding a 10% threshold of excess deaths varies by season. Across the 23 countries studied, finding at least 10% weekly excess deaths in a single week during summer or winter is not very unusual under non-pandemic conditions. These results contrast sharply with those derived using a standard negative-binomial GAM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results highlight the importance of well-calibrated prediction intervals that account for the naturally occurring seasonal uncertainty in mortality forecasting. Empirical prediction intervals provide a better performing solution for estimating forecast uncertainty in the analyses of excess deaths compared to conventional parametric intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":51476,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Metrics","volume":"22 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11633021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-024-00355-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the winter of 2022/2023, excess death estimates for Germany indicated a 10% elevation, which has led to questions about the significance of this increase in mortality. Given the inherent errors in demographic forecasting, the reliability of estimating a 10% deviation is questionable. This research addresses this issue by analyzing the error distribution in forecasts of weekly deaths. By deriving empirical prediction intervals, we provide a more accurate probabilistic study of weekly expected and excess deaths compared to the use of conventional parametric intervals.

Methods: Using weekly death data from the Short-term Mortality Database (STMF) for 23 countries, we propose empirical prediction intervals based on the distribution of past out-of-sample forecasting errors for the study of weekly expected and excess deaths. Instead of relying on the suitability of parametric assumptions or the magnitude of errors over the fitting period, empirical prediction intervals reflect the intuitive notion that a forecast is only as precise as similar forecasts in the past turned out to be. We compare the probabilistic calibration of empirical skew-normal prediction intervals with conventional parametric prediction intervals from a negative-binomial GAM in an out-of-sample setting. Further, we use the empirical prediction intervals to quantify the probability of detecting 10% excess deaths in a given week, given pre-pandemic mortality trends.

Results: The cross-country analysis shows that the empirical skew-normal prediction intervals are overall better calibrated than the conventional parametric prediction intervals. Further, the choice of prediction interval significantly affects the severity of an excess death estimate. The empirical prediction intervals reveal that the likelihood of exceeding a 10% threshold of excess deaths varies by season. Across the 23 countries studied, finding at least 10% weekly excess deaths in a single week during summer or winter is not very unusual under non-pandemic conditions. These results contrast sharply with those derived using a standard negative-binomial GAM.

Conclusion: Our results highlight the importance of well-calibrated prediction intervals that account for the naturally occurring seasonal uncertainty in mortality forecasting. Empirical prediction intervals provide a better performing solution for estimating forecast uncertainty in the analyses of excess deaths compared to conventional parametric intervals.

应用于短期死亡率预测和超额死亡的经验预测区间。
背景:在2022/2023年冬季,德国的超额死亡估计数上升了10%,这引发了对死亡率增加意义的质疑。考虑到人口预测的固有误差,估计10%偏差的可靠性值得怀疑。本研究通过分析每周死亡预测的误差分布来解决这个问题。通过推导经验预测区间,与使用常规参数区间相比,我们提供了更准确的每周预期死亡和超额死亡的概率研究。方法:利用来自23个国家短期死亡率数据库(STMF)的每周死亡数据,我们根据过去样本外预测误差的分布,提出了用于研究每周预期死亡和超额死亡的经验预测区间。经验预测间隔不依赖于参数假设的适用性或拟合期间误差的大小,而是反映了一种直观的观念,即预测的精确度仅与过去类似预测的结果相同。我们比较了样本外设置下负二项GAM的经验偏正态预测区间与常规参数预测区间的概率校准。此外,根据大流行前的死亡率趋势,我们使用经验预测间隔来量化在某一周内发现10%超额死亡的概率。结果:跨国分析表明,经验偏正态预测区间总体上优于常规参数预测区间。此外,预测区间的选择显著影响超额死亡估计的严重程度。经验预测区间显示,超过10%的超额死亡阈值的可能性随季节而变化。在所研究的23个国家中,在非大流行条件下,发现夏季或冬季一周内每周至少有10%的额外死亡并不罕见。这些结果与使用标准负二项GAM得出的结果形成鲜明对比。结论:我们的研究结果强调了校准良好的预测间隔的重要性,它可以解释死亡率预测中自然发生的季节性不确定性。与传统的参数区间相比,经验预测区间为估计超额死亡分析中的预测不确定性提供了更好的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Population Health Metrics
Population Health Metrics PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Metrics aims to advance the science of population health assessment, and welcomes papers relating to concepts, methods, ethics, applications, and summary measures of population health. The journal provides a unique platform for population health researchers to share their findings with the global community. We seek research that addresses the communication of population health measures and policy implications to stakeholders; this includes papers related to burden estimation and risk assessment, and research addressing population health across the full range of development. Population Health Metrics covers a broad range of topics encompassing health state measurement and valuation, summary measures of population health, descriptive epidemiology at the population level, burden of disease and injury analysis, disease and risk factor modeling for populations, and comparative assessment of risks to health at the population level. The journal is also interested in how to use and communicate indicators of population health to reduce disease burden, and the approaches for translating from indicators of population health to health-advancing actions. As a cross-cutting topic of importance, we are particularly interested in inequalities in population health and their measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信