Arham Aslam, Michal Hubka, Joel Sternbach, Madhan Kuppusamy
{"title":"Understanding fundamental differences in symptomatic outcomes of hiatal versus paraoesophageal hernia robotic repairs.","authors":"Arham Aslam, Michal Hubka, Joel Sternbach, Madhan Kuppusamy","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02182-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hiatal hernia (HH), or type I paraoesophageal hernias (PEH), can commonly be grouped along with types II-IV PEHs. The fundamental operation performed for repair is similar for all types. We question whether the clinical outcomes following surgical repair differ. The objective of this study is to determine the differences in clinical outcomes when comparing robotic-assisted surgical repair of HH versus types II-IV PEHs. This is a retrospective study analyzing 602 consecutive patients that underwent robotic-assisted repair of a PEH between August 2018 and June 2024. Data were retrieved from an IRB-approved database (IRB21-014). Tertiary referral center. Eligibility criteria included patients with objective findings of a PEH on diagnostic testing. 184 patients were excluded due to: emergent operation, repeat operations, conversion to open operation, patients pending follow-up, and patients lost to follow up. Patient demographics were consistent with a population-based sample. All patients underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic PEH repair with a fundoplication using the Da Vinci Xi robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). No mesh implantation was used. The primary study outcome was post-operative symptomatic improvement when comparing HH repairs versus types II-IV PEH repairs. Secondary outcomes included other perioperative outcomes. The hypothesis was formulated before data collection started. Patients in the HH cohort showed significant reflux symptom improvement postoperatively (98% vs 12.2%, p < 0.01). PEH patients also showed similar improvements in reflux symptoms (84.8% vs 25%, p < 0.01). Symptomatic improvement of dysphagia was found to be significant only in the PEH cohort (54% vs 17.8%, p < 0.01). HHs and PEHs are two distinct entities that present with different symptoms; however, the fundamental operation is similar. Symptomatic outcomes differ between the two patient populations, even with the same surgical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02182-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hiatal hernia (HH), or type I paraoesophageal hernias (PEH), can commonly be grouped along with types II-IV PEHs. The fundamental operation performed for repair is similar for all types. We question whether the clinical outcomes following surgical repair differ. The objective of this study is to determine the differences in clinical outcomes when comparing robotic-assisted surgical repair of HH versus types II-IV PEHs. This is a retrospective study analyzing 602 consecutive patients that underwent robotic-assisted repair of a PEH between August 2018 and June 2024. Data were retrieved from an IRB-approved database (IRB21-014). Tertiary referral center. Eligibility criteria included patients with objective findings of a PEH on diagnostic testing. 184 patients were excluded due to: emergent operation, repeat operations, conversion to open operation, patients pending follow-up, and patients lost to follow up. Patient demographics were consistent with a population-based sample. All patients underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic PEH repair with a fundoplication using the Da Vinci Xi robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). No mesh implantation was used. The primary study outcome was post-operative symptomatic improvement when comparing HH repairs versus types II-IV PEH repairs. Secondary outcomes included other perioperative outcomes. The hypothesis was formulated before data collection started. Patients in the HH cohort showed significant reflux symptom improvement postoperatively (98% vs 12.2%, p < 0.01). PEH patients also showed similar improvements in reflux symptoms (84.8% vs 25%, p < 0.01). Symptomatic improvement of dysphagia was found to be significant only in the PEH cohort (54% vs 17.8%, p < 0.01). HHs and PEHs are two distinct entities that present with different symptoms; however, the fundamental operation is similar. Symptomatic outcomes differ between the two patient populations, even with the same surgical management.
裂孔疝(HH)或I型食管旁疝(PEH)通常可与II-IV型食管旁疝归为一类。修复的基本操作对于所有类型都是相似的。我们质疑手术修复后的临床结果是否不同。本研究的目的是确定机器人辅助手术修复HH与II-IV型PEHs的临床结果的差异。这是一项回顾性研究,分析了2018年8月至2024年6月期间连续602名接受机器人辅助修复的PEH患者。数据从irb批准的数据库(IRB21-014)中检索。三级转诊中心。入选标准包括在诊断测试中客观发现PEH的患者。184例患者因紧急手术、重复手术、转开腹手术、待随访、失访等原因被排除。患者人口统计数据与基于人群的样本一致。所有患者均使用达芬奇Xi机器人系统(Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA)进行机器人辅助的腹腔镜PEH修复。未使用补片植入。当比较HH修复与II-IV型PEH修复时,主要研究结果是术后症状改善。次要结局包括其他围手术期结局。这个假设是在数据收集开始之前制定的。HH组患者术后反流症状明显改善(98% vs 12.2%, p
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.