Understanding fundamental differences in symptomatic outcomes of hiatal versus paraoesophageal hernia robotic repairs.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Arham Aslam, Michal Hubka, Joel Sternbach, Madhan Kuppusamy
{"title":"Understanding fundamental differences in symptomatic outcomes of hiatal versus paraoesophageal hernia robotic repairs.","authors":"Arham Aslam, Michal Hubka, Joel Sternbach, Madhan Kuppusamy","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02182-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hiatal hernia (HH), or type I paraoesophageal hernias (PEH), can commonly be grouped along with types II-IV PEHs. The fundamental operation performed for repair is similar for all types. We question whether the clinical outcomes following surgical repair differ. The objective of this study is to determine the differences in clinical outcomes when comparing robotic-assisted surgical repair of HH versus types II-IV PEHs. This is a retrospective study analyzing 602 consecutive patients that underwent robotic-assisted repair of a PEH between August 2018 and June 2024. Data were retrieved from an IRB-approved database (IRB21-014). Tertiary referral center. Eligibility criteria included patients with objective findings of a PEH on diagnostic testing. 184 patients were excluded due to: emergent operation, repeat operations, conversion to open operation, patients pending follow-up, and patients lost to follow up. Patient demographics were consistent with a population-based sample. All patients underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic PEH repair with a fundoplication using the Da Vinci Xi robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). No mesh implantation was used. The primary study outcome was post-operative symptomatic improvement when comparing HH repairs versus types II-IV PEH repairs. Secondary outcomes included other perioperative outcomes. The hypothesis was formulated before data collection started. Patients in the HH cohort showed significant reflux symptom improvement postoperatively (98% vs 12.2%, p < 0.01). PEH patients also showed similar improvements in reflux symptoms (84.8% vs 25%, p < 0.01). Symptomatic improvement of dysphagia was found to be significant only in the PEH cohort (54% vs 17.8%, p < 0.01). HHs and PEHs are two distinct entities that present with different symptoms; however, the fundamental operation is similar. Symptomatic outcomes differ between the two patient populations, even with the same surgical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02182-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hiatal hernia (HH), or type I paraoesophageal hernias (PEH), can commonly be grouped along with types II-IV PEHs. The fundamental operation performed for repair is similar for all types. We question whether the clinical outcomes following surgical repair differ. The objective of this study is to determine the differences in clinical outcomes when comparing robotic-assisted surgical repair of HH versus types II-IV PEHs. This is a retrospective study analyzing 602 consecutive patients that underwent robotic-assisted repair of a PEH between August 2018 and June 2024. Data were retrieved from an IRB-approved database (IRB21-014). Tertiary referral center. Eligibility criteria included patients with objective findings of a PEH on diagnostic testing. 184 patients were excluded due to: emergent operation, repeat operations, conversion to open operation, patients pending follow-up, and patients lost to follow up. Patient demographics were consistent with a population-based sample. All patients underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic PEH repair with a fundoplication using the Da Vinci Xi robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). No mesh implantation was used. The primary study outcome was post-operative symptomatic improvement when comparing HH repairs versus types II-IV PEH repairs. Secondary outcomes included other perioperative outcomes. The hypothesis was formulated before data collection started. Patients in the HH cohort showed significant reflux symptom improvement postoperatively (98% vs 12.2%, p < 0.01). PEH patients also showed similar improvements in reflux symptoms (84.8% vs 25%, p < 0.01). Symptomatic improvement of dysphagia was found to be significant only in the PEH cohort (54% vs 17.8%, p < 0.01). HHs and PEHs are two distinct entities that present with different symptoms; however, the fundamental operation is similar. Symptomatic outcomes differ between the two patient populations, even with the same surgical management.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信