Electrophysiology Reveals That Intuitive Physics Guides Visual Tracking and Working Memory.

Q1 Social Sciences
Open Mind Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1162/opmi_a_00174
Halely Balaban, Kevin A Smith, Joshua B Tenenbaum, Tomer D Ullman
{"title":"Electrophysiology Reveals That Intuitive Physics Guides Visual Tracking and Working Memory.","authors":"Halely Balaban, Kevin A Smith, Joshua B Tenenbaum, Tomer D Ullman","doi":"10.1162/opmi_a_00174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Starting in early infancy, our perception and predictions are rooted in strong expectations about the behavior of everyday objects. These intuitive physics expectations have been demonstrated in numerous behavioral experiments, showing that even pre-verbal infants are surprised when something impossible happens (e.g., when objects magically appear or disappear). However, it remains unclear whether and how physical expectations shape different aspects of moment-by-moment online visual scene processing, unrelated to explicit physical reasoning. In two EEG experiments, people watched short videos like those used in behavioral studies with adults and infants, and more recently in AI benchmarks. Objects moved on a stage, and were briefly hidden behind an occluder, with the scene either unfolding as expected, or violating object permanence (adding or removing an object). We measured the contralateral delay activity, an electrophysiological marker of online processing, to examine participants' working memory (WM) representations, as well as their ability to continuously track the objects in the scene. We found that both types of object permanence violations disrupted tracking, even though violations involved perceptually non-salient events (magical vanishing) or new objects that weren't previously tracked (magical creation). Physical violations caused WM to reset, i.e., to discard the original scene representation before it could recover and represent the updated number of items. Providing a physical explanation for the violations (a hole behind the occluder) restored object tracking, and we found evidence that WM continued to represent items that disappeared 'down the hole'. Our results show how intuitive physical expectations shape online representations, and form the basis of dynamic object tracking.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"8 ","pages":"1425-1446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Starting in early infancy, our perception and predictions are rooted in strong expectations about the behavior of everyday objects. These intuitive physics expectations have been demonstrated in numerous behavioral experiments, showing that even pre-verbal infants are surprised when something impossible happens (e.g., when objects magically appear or disappear). However, it remains unclear whether and how physical expectations shape different aspects of moment-by-moment online visual scene processing, unrelated to explicit physical reasoning. In two EEG experiments, people watched short videos like those used in behavioral studies with adults and infants, and more recently in AI benchmarks. Objects moved on a stage, and were briefly hidden behind an occluder, with the scene either unfolding as expected, or violating object permanence (adding or removing an object). We measured the contralateral delay activity, an electrophysiological marker of online processing, to examine participants' working memory (WM) representations, as well as their ability to continuously track the objects in the scene. We found that both types of object permanence violations disrupted tracking, even though violations involved perceptually non-salient events (magical vanishing) or new objects that weren't previously tracked (magical creation). Physical violations caused WM to reset, i.e., to discard the original scene representation before it could recover and represent the updated number of items. Providing a physical explanation for the violations (a hole behind the occluder) restored object tracking, and we found evidence that WM continued to represent items that disappeared 'down the hole'. Our results show how intuitive physical expectations shape online representations, and form the basis of dynamic object tracking.

电生理学揭示直觉物理指导视觉跟踪和工作记忆。
从婴儿期开始,我们的感知和预测就植根于对日常物品行为的强烈期望。这些直观的物理预期已经在许多行为实验中得到了证明,表明即使是不会说话的婴儿也会对不可能发生的事情感到惊讶(例如,当物体神奇地出现或消失时)。然而,与明确的物理推理无关,物理期望是否以及如何影响实时在线视觉场景处理的不同方面仍不清楚。在两个脑电图实验中,人们观看了一些短视频,比如用于成人和婴儿行为研究的视频,以及最近用于人工智能基准测试的视频。对象在舞台上移动,并短暂地隐藏在遮挡物后面,场景要么按照预期展开,要么违反对象的持久性(添加或删除对象)。我们测量了对侧延迟活动(在线处理的电生理标记),以检查参与者的工作记忆(WM)表征,以及他们连续跟踪场景中物体的能力。我们发现,这两种类型的对象持久性违反都会破坏跟踪,即使违反涉及感知上不显著的事件(魔法消失)或以前未被跟踪的新对象(魔法创造)。物理违规导致WM重置,即在恢复并表示更新后的物品数量之前丢弃原始场景表示。为违规提供物理解释(遮挡器后面有一个洞)恢复了对象跟踪,我们发现证据表明WM继续表示消失在“洞中”的项目。我们的研究结果显示了直观的物理期望如何塑造在线表征,并形成动态对象跟踪的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Mind
Open Mind Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信