{"title":"Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Persistent Olfactory Impairment After COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ah Young Bae, Do Hyun Kim, Se Hwan Hwang","doi":"10.18787/jr.2024.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of topical platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection on persistent refractory olfactory dysfunction after COVID-19 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted, focusing on studies that compared the efficacy of topical PRP treatment with a control group (receiving either placebo or no treatment) in ameliorating olfactory dysfunction. Pre- and post-treatment comparisons were evaluated, along with a subgroup analysis of olfactory function evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed a significant improvement in olfactory scores between 1 to 3 months post-treatment (standardized mean difference=1.4376; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.5934-2.2818; I<sup>2</sup>=84.1%) in the treatment group compared to the control group. Moreover, a notable disparity was observed between the two groups in the incidence of substantial recovery from anosmia or hyposmia (odds ratio=8.6639; 95% CI=2.9752-25.2292; I<sup>2</sup>=0.0%). PRP treatment led to a clinically significant increase in the threshold, discrimination, and identification (TDI) score for the Sniffin' Sticks test by >5.5 (minimum clinically significant difference; mean difference, 6.3494; 95% CI=4.0605-8.6384; I<sup>2</sup>=0.0%), as confirmed by verified examinations. The odds ratio for significant improvement among patients after treatment was determined to be 0.7654 (95% CI=0.6612-0.8451). Furthermore, all TDI subdomains exhibited significant and comparable improvements post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis indicates that the injection of PRP into the olfactory fissure or surrounding mucosal areas is an effective treatment for persistent refractory olfactory dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":33935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rhinology","volume":"31 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18787/jr.2024.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of topical platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection on persistent refractory olfactory dysfunction after COVID-19 infection.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted, focusing on studies that compared the efficacy of topical PRP treatment with a control group (receiving either placebo or no treatment) in ameliorating olfactory dysfunction. Pre- and post-treatment comparisons were evaluated, along with a subgroup analysis of olfactory function evaluation.
Results: The analysis revealed a significant improvement in olfactory scores between 1 to 3 months post-treatment (standardized mean difference=1.4376; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.5934-2.2818; I2=84.1%) in the treatment group compared to the control group. Moreover, a notable disparity was observed between the two groups in the incidence of substantial recovery from anosmia or hyposmia (odds ratio=8.6639; 95% CI=2.9752-25.2292; I2=0.0%). PRP treatment led to a clinically significant increase in the threshold, discrimination, and identification (TDI) score for the Sniffin' Sticks test by >5.5 (minimum clinically significant difference; mean difference, 6.3494; 95% CI=4.0605-8.6384; I2=0.0%), as confirmed by verified examinations. The odds ratio for significant improvement among patients after treatment was determined to be 0.7654 (95% CI=0.6612-0.8451). Furthermore, all TDI subdomains exhibited significant and comparable improvements post-treatment.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that the injection of PRP into the olfactory fissure or surrounding mucosal areas is an effective treatment for persistent refractory olfactory dysfunction.