An Analysis of Renal and Surgical Outcomes of Patients with and without Preoperative Ureteral Stenting before Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Malignancies of Higher Complexity by Using a Propensity Score-Based Approach.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Marcel Schwinger, Johanna Wege, Oliver Hahn, Hubert Kübler, Vincent Scheper, Charis Kalogirou
{"title":"An Analysis of Renal and Surgical Outcomes of Patients with and without Preoperative Ureteral Stenting before Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Malignancies of Higher Complexity by Using a Propensity Score-Based Approach.","authors":"Marcel Schwinger, Johanna Wege, Oliver Hahn, Hubert Kübler, Vincent Scheper, Charis Kalogirou","doi":"10.1159/000543073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on post-operative outcomes, especially the incidence of urinoma, in patients with complex renal tumours undergoing nephron-sparing surgery (NSS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 35 patients received preoperative ureteral stenting prior to NSS for complex tumours at the University Hospital of Würzburg between 2002 and 2021. A control group of 115 patients was established through 1:3 propensity score matching based on age, gender, T-stage, and RENAL score. Clinical parameters, surgical outcomes, and complications were assessed, and statistical comparisons were performed using the unpaired Student's t test and chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While both groups showed comparable tumour complexity (RENAL: 7 vs. 7, p = 0.58; PADUA: 9 vs. 8, p = 0.62), there were no significant differences in median hospital stay (12 vs. 11; p = 0.068), surgical time (183 vs. 190 min; p = 0.37), post-operative haemoglobin levels (11 g/dL vs. 11.1 day/dL; p = 0.9), and renal function (GFR 65 mL/min/m2 in both groups). Moreover complication severity during NSS, defined by Clavien-Dindo classification, was similar (none vs. grade I; p = 0.29). No significant difference in the rate of urinoma was observed (11% vs. 4%, p = 0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found no significant benefits of preoperative ipsilateral ureteral stenting on post-operative outcomes, particularly concerning the development of urinoma. Given these findings, preventive ureteral stenting is not recommended prior to partial kidney resection for complex renal tumours.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to evaluate the impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on post-operative outcomes, especially the incidence of urinoma, in patients with complex renal tumours undergoing nephron-sparing surgery (NSS).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 35 patients received preoperative ureteral stenting prior to NSS for complex tumours at the University Hospital of Würzburg between 2002 and 2021. A control group of 115 patients was established through 1:3 propensity score matching based on age, gender, T-stage, and RENAL score. Clinical parameters, surgical outcomes, and complications were assessed, and statistical comparisons were performed using the unpaired Student's t test and chi-square test.

Results: While both groups showed comparable tumour complexity (RENAL: 7 vs. 7, p = 0.58; PADUA: 9 vs. 8, p = 0.62), there were no significant differences in median hospital stay (12 vs. 11; p = 0.068), surgical time (183 vs. 190 min; p = 0.37), post-operative haemoglobin levels (11 g/dL vs. 11.1 day/dL; p = 0.9), and renal function (GFR 65 mL/min/m2 in both groups). Moreover complication severity during NSS, defined by Clavien-Dindo classification, was similar (none vs. grade I; p = 0.29). No significant difference in the rate of urinoma was observed (11% vs. 4%, p = 0.93).

Conclusions: This study found no significant benefits of preoperative ipsilateral ureteral stenting on post-operative outcomes, particularly concerning the development of urinoma. Given these findings, preventive ureteral stenting is not recommended prior to partial kidney resection for complex renal tumours.

采用基于倾向评分的方法分析高复杂性肾恶性肿瘤患者在保留肾单元手术前术前输尿管支架置入术和不术前输尿管支架置入术的肾脏和手术结果。
前言:本研究旨在评估术前输尿管支架置入术对复杂肾肿瘤患者行保留肾脏手术后预后的影响,尤其是尿瘤的发生率。方法:回顾性分析2002年至2021年期间在德国维尔茨堡大学医院接受保留肾脏手术前输尿管支架置入术的35例复杂肿瘤患者。根据年龄、性别、t分期、肾评分进行1:3倾向评分匹配,建立对照组115例。评估临床参数、手术结果和并发症,采用非配对学生t检验和卡方检验进行统计学比较。结果:两组肿瘤复杂性相当(肾:7 vs 7, p=0.58;PADUA: 9 vs 8, p=0.62),中位住院时间无显著差异(12 vs 11;P =0.068),手术时间(183 vs 190分钟;P =0.37),术后血红蛋白水平(11g/dl vs. 11.1d/dl;p=0.9)和肾功能(两组GFR均为65 ml/min/m²)。此外,以Clavien-Dindo分类定义的NSS并发症严重程度相似(无与I级;p = 0.29)。两组尿瘤发生率无显著差异(11% vs. 4%, p=0.93)。结论:本研究发现术前同侧输尿管支架置入术对术后预后没有显著的益处,特别是关于尿瘤的发展。鉴于这些发现,对于复杂的肾肿瘤,不建议在部分肾切除术前进行预防性输尿管支架置入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信