Association between physical intimate partner violence and postpartum contraceptive use in the United States-evidence from PRAMS 2016-2021.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-12-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0314938
Rashida-E Ijdi, Janine Barden-O'Fallon
{"title":"Association between physical intimate partner violence and postpartum contraceptive use in the United States-evidence from PRAMS 2016-2021.","authors":"Rashida-E Ijdi, Janine Barden-O'Fallon","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0314938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) continues to be a major global public health concern, impacting physical and psychological well-being of individuals, including their reproductive and sexual health. The objective of this study is to examine the association between physical intimate partner violence and the utilization of contraception during the postpartum period in the United States.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study used data from the CDC's Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey study phase 8, covering 2016-2021. The sample included 165,204 women reporting physical IPV during pregnancy or 12 months before their last pregnancy and their postpartum contraceptive use. Descriptive, bivariate, and logistic regressions were used to analyze the relationship between IPV and postpartum contraceptive use, adjusting for relevant factors and addressing sampling weights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found a 3.2% prevalence of physical IPV, with state variances ranging from 2.2% to 5.5%. Among women who experienced physical IPV, 91.0% used contraception, compared to 94.5% of those who did not experience physical IPV. Experiencing physical IPV significantly decreased the likelihood of using any postpartum contraceptive method by 42% (aOR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.48-0.70) compared to those who did not experience physical IPV during the same period, after adjusting for covariates. Factors that increased the probability of using contraception during the postpartum period included women's higher educational attainment, being married or cohabitating, being employed anytime during pregnancy, and having an unintended last pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the significant association between physical IPV and reduced use of postpartum contraception in the United States. It calls for the integration of IPV considerations into public health policies and clinical initiatives to improve maternal well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 12","pages":"e0314938"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11633987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314938","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) continues to be a major global public health concern, impacting physical and psychological well-being of individuals, including their reproductive and sexual health. The objective of this study is to examine the association between physical intimate partner violence and the utilization of contraception during the postpartum period in the United States.

Method: This study used data from the CDC's Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey study phase 8, covering 2016-2021. The sample included 165,204 women reporting physical IPV during pregnancy or 12 months before their last pregnancy and their postpartum contraceptive use. Descriptive, bivariate, and logistic regressions were used to analyze the relationship between IPV and postpartum contraceptive use, adjusting for relevant factors and addressing sampling weights.

Results: The study found a 3.2% prevalence of physical IPV, with state variances ranging from 2.2% to 5.5%. Among women who experienced physical IPV, 91.0% used contraception, compared to 94.5% of those who did not experience physical IPV. Experiencing physical IPV significantly decreased the likelihood of using any postpartum contraceptive method by 42% (aOR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.48-0.70) compared to those who did not experience physical IPV during the same period, after adjusting for covariates. Factors that increased the probability of using contraception during the postpartum period included women's higher educational attainment, being married or cohabitating, being employed anytime during pregnancy, and having an unintended last pregnancy.

Conclusion: This study highlights the significant association between physical IPV and reduced use of postpartum contraception in the United States. It calls for the integration of IPV considerations into public health policies and clinical initiatives to improve maternal well-being.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在美国,身体亲密伴侣暴力与产后避孕药使用之间的关联——来自PRAMS 2016-2021的证据。
目标:亲密伴侣暴力仍然是一个主要的全球公共卫生问题,影响个人的身心健康,包括生殖健康和性健康。本研究的目的是检查在美国的身体亲密伴侣暴力和产后期间使用避孕措施之间的关系。方法:本研究使用美国疾病预防控制中心妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)调查研究第8期的数据,涵盖2016-2021年。该样本包括165,204名在怀孕期间或最后一次怀孕前12个月报告身体IPV和产后避孕药使用情况的妇女。使用描述性、双变量和逻辑回归分析IPV与产后避孕药使用之间的关系,调整相关因素并处理抽样权重。结果:研究发现,物理IPV患病率为3.2%,各州差异从2.2%到5.5%不等。在经历过身体性IPV的妇女中,91.0%的人采取了避孕措施,而没有经历身体性IPV的妇女中有94.5%的人采取了避孕措施。经历物理IPV显著降低42%使用任何产后避孕方法的可能性(aOR: 0.58;95% CI: 0.48-0.70),在调整协变量后,与同期未经历物理IPV的患者进行比较。在产后使用避孕措施的可能性增加的因素包括女性受教育程度较高、已婚或同居、怀孕期间随时有工作以及上次意外怀孕。结论:本研究强调了在美国,物理IPV与产后避孕减少使用之间的显著关联。它要求将IPV考虑纳入公共卫生政策和临床举措,以改善孕产妇福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信