{"title":"Alternative palbociclib dosing schedules for hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.","authors":"Makiko Go, Michio Kimura, Shiori Yamada, Keitaro Kamei, Yoshinori Noguchi, Eiseki Usami, Tomoaki Yoshimura","doi":"10.1159/000542991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor palbociclib is associated with a high incidence of neutropenia. Treatment continuation using the standard dosing schedule (3 consecutive weeks of oral administration followed by 1-week off-treatment: 3/1 schedule) can be difficult and other dosing schedules have been previously adopted. We aimed to investigate whether alternative dosing schedules can be used effectively to continue palbociclib.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included all patients who received palbociclib for hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2-MBC) at Ogaki Municipal Hospital between January 2018 and November 2023. Reasons for treatment discontinuation, changes in treatment administration, treatment duration, relative dose intensity (RDI), overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and adverse events were retrospectively investigated using electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On November 30, 2023 (a data censor date), patients who discontinued or continued palbociclib on the 3/1 schedule were classified into the 3/1 schedule group (n=20), and those who started a 3/1 schedule (partly on a 2/2 schedule) and then switched to the 3/2 schedule or the 2/2 schedule (2 consecutive weeks of oral administration followed by 2 weeks off) were classified into the 3/2 (n=10) or 2/2 schedule groups (n=18), respectively. For the 3/1, 3/2, and 2/2 schedule groups, respectively, the median treatment duration was 255.5, 1253.0, and 923.0 days (p=0.0013), the median RDI (%) was 71.0%, 69.2%, and 40.8% (p<0.001), and the ORR was 15.0%, 80.0%, and 50.0% (p=0.002), while the CBR was 55.0%, 100%, and 72.2% (p=0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dosing schedules other than the standard 3/1 schedule can be used to continue palbociclib with HR+/HER2-MBC while ensuring therapeutic efficacy. Alternative dosing schedules look promising and need further research (preferably, prospective studies) with a larger sample size and longer follow-up to validate treatment efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542991","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor palbociclib is associated with a high incidence of neutropenia. Treatment continuation using the standard dosing schedule (3 consecutive weeks of oral administration followed by 1-week off-treatment: 3/1 schedule) can be difficult and other dosing schedules have been previously adopted. We aimed to investigate whether alternative dosing schedules can be used effectively to continue palbociclib.
Methods: This study included all patients who received palbociclib for hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2-MBC) at Ogaki Municipal Hospital between January 2018 and November 2023. Reasons for treatment discontinuation, changes in treatment administration, treatment duration, relative dose intensity (RDI), overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and adverse events were retrospectively investigated using electronic medical records.
Results: On November 30, 2023 (a data censor date), patients who discontinued or continued palbociclib on the 3/1 schedule were classified into the 3/1 schedule group (n=20), and those who started a 3/1 schedule (partly on a 2/2 schedule) and then switched to the 3/2 schedule or the 2/2 schedule (2 consecutive weeks of oral administration followed by 2 weeks off) were classified into the 3/2 (n=10) or 2/2 schedule groups (n=18), respectively. For the 3/1, 3/2, and 2/2 schedule groups, respectively, the median treatment duration was 255.5, 1253.0, and 923.0 days (p=0.0013), the median RDI (%) was 71.0%, 69.2%, and 40.8% (p<0.001), and the ORR was 15.0%, 80.0%, and 50.0% (p=0.002), while the CBR was 55.0%, 100%, and 72.2% (p=0.028).
Conclusion: Dosing schedules other than the standard 3/1 schedule can be used to continue palbociclib with HR+/HER2-MBC while ensuring therapeutic efficacy. Alternative dosing schedules look promising and need further research (preferably, prospective studies) with a larger sample size and longer follow-up to validate treatment efficacy.
期刊介绍:
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.