Mobility scale for acute stroke patients (MSAS): construct validity and reliability of the Italian scale.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1007/s10072-024-07890-1
Serena Di Tondo, Mariele Colucci, Laura Abbruzzese, Giovanni Galeoto, Marco Tofani, Pierluigi Zoccolotti, Mauro Mancuso
{"title":"Mobility scale for acute stroke patients (MSAS): construct validity and reliability of the Italian scale.","authors":"Serena Di Tondo, Mariele Colucci, Laura Abbruzzese, Giovanni Galeoto, Marco Tofani, Pierluigi Zoccolotti, Mauro Mancuso","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07890-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Mobility Scale for Acute Stroke Patients (MSAS) was developed to discriminate between the lower levels of mobility in acute stroke patients in the first two weeks post-onset.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aims to develop and validate an Italian version of the MSAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The English version of the MSAS was translated into Italian according to international guidelines. We recruited 58 patients admitted to a rehabilitation facility within 14 days of the stroke onset and administered the MSAS to test the internal consistency, concurrent validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As for internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha showed values equal to 0.96, and the alpha deleted analysis indicated that all the items have reason to exist. Concurrent validity showed statistically significant data for all sub-scales. The Italian version of the MSAS showed significant and high inter-rater reliabilities (all ICCs ≥ 0.75). The MSAS also showed excellent test-retest reliabilities (all ICCs ≥ 0.90). The reactivity of the scale, evaluated through the Student's t-test for paired samples on a sub-sample of 32 patients, showed statistically significant improvements over time for all items and the total scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results show that the scale is stable and reliable both in the evaluation after 24 h and between different operators. High internal consistency and a strong concurrent validity were found. The scale also proved able to detect the improvement obtained by patients following the rehabilitation treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1687-1694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07890-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Mobility Scale for Acute Stroke Patients (MSAS) was developed to discriminate between the lower levels of mobility in acute stroke patients in the first two weeks post-onset.

Objective: The present study aims to develop and validate an Italian version of the MSAS.

Methods: The English version of the MSAS was translated into Italian according to international guidelines. We recruited 58 patients admitted to a rehabilitation facility within 14 days of the stroke onset and administered the MSAS to test the internal consistency, concurrent validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the scale.

Results: As for internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha showed values equal to 0.96, and the alpha deleted analysis indicated that all the items have reason to exist. Concurrent validity showed statistically significant data for all sub-scales. The Italian version of the MSAS showed significant and high inter-rater reliabilities (all ICCs ≥ 0.75). The MSAS also showed excellent test-retest reliabilities (all ICCs ≥ 0.90). The reactivity of the scale, evaluated through the Student's t-test for paired samples on a sub-sample of 32 patients, showed statistically significant improvements over time for all items and the total scale.

Conclusions: The results show that the scale is stable and reliable both in the evaluation after 24 h and between different operators. High internal consistency and a strong concurrent validity were found. The scale also proved able to detect the improvement obtained by patients following the rehabilitation treatments.

急性脑卒中患者活动能力量表(MSAS):意大利量表的结构效度和信度。
背景:急性脑卒中患者活动能力量表(MSAS)的开发是为了区分急性脑卒中患者在发病后的头两周内活动能力水平较低。目的:本研究的目的是开发和验证一个意大利语版本的MSAS。方法:按照国际标准将MSAS的英文版本翻译成意大利语。我们招募了58例中风发作后14天内入住康复机构的患者,并进行了MSAS测试,以测试量表的内部一致性、并发效度、信度和反应性。结果:内部一致性方面,Cronbach’s alpha值为0.96,alpha删除分析表明所有条目都有存在的理由。所有子量表的并发效度数据均有统计学意义。意大利版的MSAS表现出显著和高的评分间信度(所有ICCs≥0.75)。MSAS也表现出优异的重测信度(所有ICCs≥0.90)。量表的反应性,通过对32名患者的子样本进行配对样本的学生t检验来评估,随着时间的推移,所有项目和总量表的统计显著改善。结论:该量表在24 h后的评价和不同操作人员之间的评价均稳定可靠。具有较高的内部一致性和较强的并发效度。该量表也被证明能够检测患者在康复治疗后获得的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信