The effect of case-supported concept map education on nursing students' knowledge of and attitudes toward pressure injury prevention.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Hale Turhan Damar, Özüm Erkin
{"title":"The effect of case-supported concept map education on nursing students' knowledge of and attitudes toward pressure injury prevention.","authors":"Hale Turhan Damar, Özüm Erkin","doi":"10.1016/j.jtv.2024.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of case-based concept map education on nursing students' knowledge of and attitudes toward pressure injury prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-group, pre-and post-test,quasi-experimental study. It was conducted in a school of nursing in Türkiye with seventy-seven students. Students received case-supported concept map education to prevent pressure injury. Data were collected using the Pressure Ulcer Prevention Knowledge Assessment Instrument (PUPKAI) and the Pressure Ulcer Prevention Attitude Instrument (APuP) before, immediately after, and four weeks after education. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance for repeated measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences between the three time points in terms of the PUPKAI total (F = 33.925, p < 0.001) and subscales scores (etiology and development (F = 7.362, p = 0.001), classification and observation (F = 48.386, p < 0.001), nutrition (F = 4.766, p = 0.011), preventive measures to reduce the amount of pressure/shear (F = 42.762, p < 0.001), and preventive measures to reduce the duration of pressure/shear (F = 5.248, p = 0.025), except for risk assessment (p < 0.05). There were also significant differences between the three time points in terms of the APuP total score (F = 33.925, p = 0.018). The Bonferroni test revealed a statistically significant difference between the pre-test and post-test APuP total scores (p = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrated that case-supported concept map education significantly improved nursing students' knowledge of and attitudes toward pressure injury prevention. These findings suggest that incorporating case-supported concept map education into nursing curricula can effectively enhance students' competence in pressure injury prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":17392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of tissue viability","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of tissue viability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.12.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of case-based concept map education on nursing students' knowledge of and attitudes toward pressure injury prevention.

Methods: This is a single-group, pre-and post-test,quasi-experimental study. It was conducted in a school of nursing in Türkiye with seventy-seven students. Students received case-supported concept map education to prevent pressure injury. Data were collected using the Pressure Ulcer Prevention Knowledge Assessment Instrument (PUPKAI) and the Pressure Ulcer Prevention Attitude Instrument (APuP) before, immediately after, and four weeks after education. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance for repeated measures.

Results: There were significant differences between the three time points in terms of the PUPKAI total (F = 33.925, p < 0.001) and subscales scores (etiology and development (F = 7.362, p = 0.001), classification and observation (F = 48.386, p < 0.001), nutrition (F = 4.766, p = 0.011), preventive measures to reduce the amount of pressure/shear (F = 42.762, p < 0.001), and preventive measures to reduce the duration of pressure/shear (F = 5.248, p = 0.025), except for risk assessment (p < 0.05). There were also significant differences between the three time points in terms of the APuP total score (F = 33.925, p = 0.018). The Bonferroni test revealed a statistically significant difference between the pre-test and post-test APuP total scores (p = 0.022).

Conclusions: The study demonstrated that case-supported concept map education significantly improved nursing students' knowledge of and attitudes toward pressure injury prevention. These findings suggest that incorporating case-supported concept map education into nursing curricula can effectively enhance students' competence in pressure injury prevention.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of tissue viability
Journal of tissue viability DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
16.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tissue Viability is the official publication of the Tissue Viability Society and is a quarterly journal concerned with all aspects of the occurrence and treatment of wounds, ulcers and pressure sores including patient care, pain, nutrition, wound healing, research, prevention, mobility, social problems and management. The Journal particularly encourages papers covering skin and skin wounds but will consider articles that discuss injury in any tissue. Articles that stress the multi-professional nature of tissue viability are especially welcome. We seek to encourage new authors as well as well-established contributors to the field - one aim of the journal is to enable all participants in tissue viability to share information with colleagues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信