Default Antibiotic Order Durations for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Outpatient Pediatrics: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Kali A Broussard, Juan D Chaparro, Guliz Erdem, Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul, Jack Stevens, Joshua R Watson
{"title":"Default Antibiotic Order Durations for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Outpatient Pediatrics: A Cluster Randomized Trial.","authors":"Kali A Broussard, Juan D Chaparro, Guliz Erdem, Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul, Jack Stevens, Joshua R Watson","doi":"10.1093/jpids/piae127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotic durations for uncomplicated skin/soft tissue infections (SSTI) often exceed the guideline-recommended 5-7 days. We assessed the effectiveness of a default duration order panel in the Electronic Health Record to reduce long prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cluster randomized trial of an SSTI order panel with default antibiotic durations (implemented 12/2021), compared to a control panel (no decision support) in 14 pediatric primary care clinics. We assessed long prescription rates from 23 months before to 12 months after order panel implementation (1/2020-12/2022). Antibiotic duration was considered long if >5 days for cellulitis or drained abscess, or >7 days for undrained abscess, impetigo, or other SSTI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1123 and 511 encounters in intervention and control clinics, respectively. In a piecewise generalized linear model, the long prescription rate decreased from 63.8% to 54.6% (absolute difference, -9.2%) in the intervention group and from 70.0% to 54.9% (absolute difference, -15.1%) in the control group. The relative change in trajectories from pre-panel to post-panel periods did not differ significantly between intervention and control groups (P = .488). Although used in only 29.4% of eligible encounters, intervention panel use had lower odds of long prescription compared to all other prescriptions (odds ratio 0.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not detect an overall impact of an order panel with default durations in reducing long antibiotic prescriptions for SSTIs. When ordered from the intervention panel, prescriptions were usually guideline-concordant. Effective strategies to make choosing a default duration more automatic are necessary to further reduce long prescriptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piae127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic durations for uncomplicated skin/soft tissue infections (SSTI) often exceed the guideline-recommended 5-7 days. We assessed the effectiveness of a default duration order panel in the Electronic Health Record to reduce long prescriptions.

Methods: Cluster randomized trial of an SSTI order panel with default antibiotic durations (implemented 12/2021), compared to a control panel (no decision support) in 14 pediatric primary care clinics. We assessed long prescription rates from 23 months before to 12 months after order panel implementation (1/2020-12/2022). Antibiotic duration was considered long if >5 days for cellulitis or drained abscess, or >7 days for undrained abscess, impetigo, or other SSTI.

Results: We included 1123 and 511 encounters in intervention and control clinics, respectively. In a piecewise generalized linear model, the long prescription rate decreased from 63.8% to 54.6% (absolute difference, -9.2%) in the intervention group and from 70.0% to 54.9% (absolute difference, -15.1%) in the control group. The relative change in trajectories from pre-panel to post-panel periods did not differ significantly between intervention and control groups (P = .488). Although used in only 29.4% of eligible encounters, intervention panel use had lower odds of long prescription compared to all other prescriptions (odds ratio 0.18).

Conclusions: We did not detect an overall impact of an order panel with default durations in reducing long antibiotic prescriptions for SSTIs. When ordered from the intervention panel, prescriptions were usually guideline-concordant. Effective strategies to make choosing a default duration more automatic are necessary to further reduce long prescriptions.

门诊儿科皮肤和软组织感染的默认抗生素处方持续时间:一项集群随机试验。
背景:无并发症皮肤/软组织感染(SSTI)的抗生素持续时间通常超过指南推荐的5-7天。我们评估了电子健康记录(EHR)中默认持续时间订单面板的有效性,以减少长处方。方法:在14个儿科初级保健诊所中,对具有默认抗生素持续时间的SSTI订单面板(实施于12/2021年)与对照面板(无决策支持)进行集群随机试验。我们评估了订单面板实施前23个月至12个月(2020年1月至2022年12月)的长期处方率。如果蜂窝组织炎或排脓脓肿bbb50天,或未排脓脓肿、脓疱或其他SSTI >7天,则认为抗生素持续时间长。结果:我们在干预诊所和对照诊所分别纳入了1123例和511例病例。在分段广义线性模型中,干预组长期处方率从63.8%下降到54.6%(绝对差值,-9.2%),对照组从70.0%下降到54.9%(绝对差值,-15.1%)。干预组和对照组之间从治疗前到治疗后的相对变化轨迹没有显著差异(P = .488)。虽然只有29.4%的合格就诊使用干预小组,但与所有其他处方相比,使用干预小组的长期处方的几率较低(OR 0.18)。结论:我们没有发现具有默认持续时间的订单面板在减少ssti的长抗生素处方方面的总体影响。当从干预小组订购时,处方通常与指南一致。有必要采取有效的策略,使选择默认期限更加自动化,以进一步减少长期处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
179
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (JPIDS), the official journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, is dedicated to perinatal, childhood, and adolescent infectious diseases. The journal is a high-quality source of original research articles, clinical trial reports, guidelines, and topical reviews, with particular attention to the interests and needs of the global pediatric infectious diseases communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信