Jan Pieter R Koopman, Emma L Houlder, Jacqueline J Janse, Olivia Ac Lamers, Geert Vt Roozen, Jeroen C Sijtsma, Miriam Casacuberta-Partal, Stan T Hilt, M Y Eileen C van der Stoep, Inge M van Amerongen-Westra, Eric At Brienen, Linda J Wammes, Lisette van Lieshout, Govert J van Dam, Paul Lam Corstjens, Angela van Diepen, Maria Yazdanbakhsh, Cornelis H Hokke, Meta Roestenberg
{"title":"Clinical tolerance but no protective efficacy in a placebo-controlled trial of repeated controlled schistosome infection.","authors":"Jan Pieter R Koopman, Emma L Houlder, Jacqueline J Janse, Olivia Ac Lamers, Geert Vt Roozen, Jeroen C Sijtsma, Miriam Casacuberta-Partal, Stan T Hilt, M Y Eileen C van der Stoep, Inge M van Amerongen-Westra, Eric At Brienen, Linda J Wammes, Lisette van Lieshout, Govert J van Dam, Paul Lam Corstjens, Angela van Diepen, Maria Yazdanbakhsh, Cornelis H Hokke, Meta Roestenberg","doi":"10.1172/JCI185422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Partial protective immunity to schistosomiasis develops over time, following repeated praziquantel treatment. Moreover, animals develop protective immunity after repeated immunisation with irradiated cercariae. Here, we evaluated development of natural immunity through consecutive exposure-treatment cycles with Schistosoma mansoni (Sm) in healthy, Schistosoma-naïve participants using single-sex controlled human Sm infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four participants were randomised double-blind (1:1) to either the reinfection group, which received three exposures (week 0,9,18) to 20 male cercariae or the infection control group, which received two mock exposures with water (week 0,9) prior to cercariae exposure (week 18). Participants were treated with praziquantel (or placebo) at week 8, 17 and 30. Attack rates after the final exposure (week 19-30) using serum circulating anodic antigen (CAA) positivity were compared between groups. Adverse events were collected for safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three participants completed follow-up. No protective efficacy was seen, given 82% (9/11) attack rate after the final exposure in the reinfection group and 92% (11/12) in the infection control group (protective efficacy 11%; 95% CI -24% to 35%; p =0.5). Related adverse events were higher after the first infection (45%), compared to the second (27%) and third infection (28%). Severe acute schistosomiasis was observed after the first infections only (2/12 in reinfection group and 2/12 in infection control group).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Repeated Schistosoma exposure and treatment cycles resulted in apparent clinical tolerance, with fewer symptoms reported with subsequent infections, but did not result in protection against reinfection.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong></p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov NCT05085470.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>ERC Starting grant (no. 101075876).</p>","PeriodicalId":15469,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI185422","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Partial protective immunity to schistosomiasis develops over time, following repeated praziquantel treatment. Moreover, animals develop protective immunity after repeated immunisation with irradiated cercariae. Here, we evaluated development of natural immunity through consecutive exposure-treatment cycles with Schistosoma mansoni (Sm) in healthy, Schistosoma-naïve participants using single-sex controlled human Sm infection.
Methods: Twenty-four participants were randomised double-blind (1:1) to either the reinfection group, which received three exposures (week 0,9,18) to 20 male cercariae or the infection control group, which received two mock exposures with water (week 0,9) prior to cercariae exposure (week 18). Participants were treated with praziquantel (or placebo) at week 8, 17 and 30. Attack rates after the final exposure (week 19-30) using serum circulating anodic antigen (CAA) positivity were compared between groups. Adverse events were collected for safety.
Results: Twenty-three participants completed follow-up. No protective efficacy was seen, given 82% (9/11) attack rate after the final exposure in the reinfection group and 92% (11/12) in the infection control group (protective efficacy 11%; 95% CI -24% to 35%; p =0.5). Related adverse events were higher after the first infection (45%), compared to the second (27%) and third infection (28%). Severe acute schistosomiasis was observed after the first infections only (2/12 in reinfection group and 2/12 in infection control group).
Conclusion: Repeated Schistosoma exposure and treatment cycles resulted in apparent clinical tolerance, with fewer symptoms reported with subsequent infections, but did not result in protection against reinfection.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Investigation, established in 1924 by the ASCI, is a prestigious publication that focuses on breakthroughs in basic and clinical biomedical science, with the goal of advancing the field of medicine. With an impressive Impact Factor of 15.9 in 2022, it is recognized as one of the leading journals in the "Medicine, Research & Experimental" category of the Web of Science.
The journal attracts a diverse readership from various medical disciplines and sectors. It publishes a wide range of research articles encompassing all biomedical specialties, including Autoimmunity, Gastroenterology, Immunology, Metabolism, Nephrology, Neuroscience, Oncology, Pulmonology, Vascular Biology, and many others.
The Editorial Board consists of esteemed academic editors who possess extensive expertise in their respective fields. They are actively involved in research, ensuring the journal's high standards of publication and scientific rigor.