Utility and safety of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation with small-incision sphincterotomy for small bile duct stones: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yuki Ishida, Takeshi Hisa, Ryusuke Matsumoto, Shigeru Nishiyama, Akiharu Kudo, Takahiro Yamada, Shozo Osera, Akihisa Tomori, Hideki Fukushima
{"title":"Utility and safety of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation with small-incision sphincterotomy for small bile duct stones: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yuki Ishida, Takeshi Hisa, Ryusuke Matsumoto, Shigeru Nishiyama, Akiharu Kudo, Takahiro Yamada, Shozo Osera, Akihisa Tomori, Hideki Fukushima","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) for bile duct stones (BDS) can cause basket impaction with stone, complicating the procedure. In this study, we evaluated the utility and safety of small incision ES combined with endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (sES + EPBD) (balloon dilated up to the stone size), compared with ES alone for BDS <12 mm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary endpoint was the frequency of mechanical lithotripsy (ML), indicating the risk of basket impaction with stone; however, the secondary endpoints were procedure time, successful stone removal, and early adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 patients were randomized into the ES and sES + EPBD groups (n = 50 for each). Significantly fewer cases required ML (20.0% vs. 4.0%, p = .028) in the sES + EPBD group. The maximum short-axis diameter of the stones in all patients requiring ML in the ES group ranged from 8 to 11 mm. The median procedure time was significantly shorter (18.5 min vs. 17 min, p = .047) in the sES + EPBD group. Both groups showed similar frequencies of successful stone removal in one session (88.0% vs. 98.0%, p = .112) and early adverse events (4.0% vs. 2.0%, p = .62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In cases of small BDS, sES + EPBD exhibits a low frequency of ML, which shortens procedure time and prevents basket impaction with stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) for bile duct stones (BDS) can cause basket impaction with stone, complicating the procedure. In this study, we evaluated the utility and safety of small incision ES combined with endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (sES + EPBD) (balloon dilated up to the stone size), compared with ES alone for BDS <12 mm.

Methods: The primary endpoint was the frequency of mechanical lithotripsy (ML), indicating the risk of basket impaction with stone; however, the secondary endpoints were procedure time, successful stone removal, and early adverse events.

Results: A total of 100 patients were randomized into the ES and sES + EPBD groups (n = 50 for each). Significantly fewer cases required ML (20.0% vs. 4.0%, p = .028) in the sES + EPBD group. The maximum short-axis diameter of the stones in all patients requiring ML in the ES group ranged from 8 to 11 mm. The median procedure time was significantly shorter (18.5 min vs. 17 min, p = .047) in the sES + EPBD group. Both groups showed similar frequencies of successful stone removal in one session (88.0% vs. 98.0%, p = .112) and early adverse events (4.0% vs. 2.0%, p = .62).

Conclusion: In cases of small BDS, sES + EPBD exhibits a low frequency of ML, which shortens procedure time and prevents basket impaction with stones.

内镜下乳头状球囊扩张联合小切口括约肌切开术治疗小胆管结石的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验。
背景:内镜下括约肌切开术(ES)治疗胆管结石(BDS)可引起结石篮嵌塞,使手术复杂化。在这项研究中,我们评估了小切口ES联合内镜下乳头状球囊扩张(sES + EPBD)(球囊扩张至结石大小)与单独ES进行BDS的有效性和安全性。方法:主要终点是机械碎石(ML)的频率,表明篮状结石内塞的风险;然而,次要终点是手术时间、结石清除成功和早期不良事件。结果:100例患者随机分为ES组和sES + EPBD组,每组50例。sES + EPBD组需要ML的病例明显减少(20.0% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.028)。ES组所有需要ML的患者结石的最大短轴直径为8 - 11mm。sES + EPBD组的中位手术时间显著缩短(18.5 min vs. 17 min, p = 0.047)。两组在一次手术中成功取出结石的频率相似(88.0%对98.0%,p = 0.112),早期不良事件发生率相似(4.0%对2.0%,p = 0.62)。结论:在小BDS病例中,sES + EPBD表现出低频率的ML,缩短了手术时间,防止了结石篮嵌塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信