Microbial Growth, Survival, and Cryotolerance in Plant-Based Milk Alternatives: A Study with Listeria monocytogenes.

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Reha Onur Azizoglu
{"title":"Microbial Growth, Survival, and Cryotolerance in Plant-Based Milk Alternatives: A Study with <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i>.","authors":"Reha Onur Azizoglu","doi":"10.1089/fpd.2024.0141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing popularity of plant-based milk products as an alternative to traditional bovine milk has sparked concerns about their safety and nutritional impact. This study focuses on the growth, survival, and cryotolerance behavior of <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> (strains: ATCC 19115 and RS1) in various plant-based milk substitutes. Samples of almond milk, oat milk, soy milk, and bovine milk, all subjected to ultra-high temperature treatment, were evaluated for their influence on <i>L. monocytogenes</i> growth at 4°C and survival through repeated freezing and thawing cycles. Despite the nutritional differences, the growth rates of two <i>L. monocytogenes</i> strains at 4°C in plant-based milk alternatives and bovine milk displayed similarity (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Both strains of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> demonstrated similar biofilm formation abilities in plant-based milk alternatives and bovine milk. However, <i>L. monocytogenes</i> exhibited different levels of tolerance to repeated freezing and thawing cycles depending on plant-based milk alternatives in which they were grown at 4°C (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In the case of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> ATCC19115, cells cultured in almond milk at 4°C showed a significant reduction in their freezing and thawing tolerance (2.80 log reduction), followed by cells grown in soy milk (2.09 log reduction) when compared with oat and bovine milk (<i>p</i> < 0.05). A parallel trend of tolerance was evident in <i>L. monocytogenes</i> RS1 (2.82 and 3.22 log reduction in almond milk and soy milk, respectively). These findings underscore the need for comprehensive assessments of microbial behavior in emerging food products like plant-based milk alternatives. As these alternatives continue to gain traction, ensuring their safety and stability remains important. With insights into <i>L. monocytogenes</i> growth and survival in milk alternatives, this study will contribute to the evolving understanding of microbial dynamics in response to changing dietary trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":12333,"journal":{"name":"Foodborne pathogens and disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foodborne pathogens and disease","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2024.0141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing popularity of plant-based milk products as an alternative to traditional bovine milk has sparked concerns about their safety and nutritional impact. This study focuses on the growth, survival, and cryotolerance behavior of Listeria monocytogenes (strains: ATCC 19115 and RS1) in various plant-based milk substitutes. Samples of almond milk, oat milk, soy milk, and bovine milk, all subjected to ultra-high temperature treatment, were evaluated for their influence on L. monocytogenes growth at 4°C and survival through repeated freezing and thawing cycles. Despite the nutritional differences, the growth rates of two L. monocytogenes strains at 4°C in plant-based milk alternatives and bovine milk displayed similarity (p > 0.05). Both strains of L. monocytogenes demonstrated similar biofilm formation abilities in plant-based milk alternatives and bovine milk. However, L. monocytogenes exhibited different levels of tolerance to repeated freezing and thawing cycles depending on plant-based milk alternatives in which they were grown at 4°C (p < 0.05). In the case of L. monocytogenes ATCC19115, cells cultured in almond milk at 4°C showed a significant reduction in their freezing and thawing tolerance (2.80 log reduction), followed by cells grown in soy milk (2.09 log reduction) when compared with oat and bovine milk (p < 0.05). A parallel trend of tolerance was evident in L. monocytogenes RS1 (2.82 and 3.22 log reduction in almond milk and soy milk, respectively). These findings underscore the need for comprehensive assessments of microbial behavior in emerging food products like plant-based milk alternatives. As these alternatives continue to gain traction, ensuring their safety and stability remains important. With insights into L. monocytogenes growth and survival in milk alternatives, this study will contribute to the evolving understanding of microbial dynamics in response to changing dietary trends.

植物性牛奶替代品中的微生物生长、存活和低温耐受性:单核细胞增生李斯特菌的研究。
植物性乳制品作为传统牛奶的替代品越来越受欢迎,这引发了人们对其安全性和营养影响的担忧。本研究主要研究单核增生李斯特菌(菌株:ATCC 19115和RS1)在各种植物性乳代用品中的生长、存活和低温耐受性行为。对杏仁奶、燕麦奶、豆奶和牛乳样品进行超高温处理,评估其在4°C下对单核细胞增生乳杆菌生长的影响,以及通过反复冷冻和解冻循环对其存活的影响。尽管营养成分不同,但在4°C条件下,两株单增乳乳杆菌在植物性乳替代品和牛乳中的生长速率相似(p < 0.05)。两株单核增生乳杆菌在植物性乳替代品和牛乳中表现出相似的生物膜形成能力。然而,单增乳乳杆菌对重复冷冻和解冻循环的耐受性不同,这取决于它们在4°C下生长的植物性牛奶替代品(p < 0.05)。以单核增生乳杆菌ATCC19115为例,与燕麦和牛相比,在4°C杏仁奶中培养的细胞的冻融耐受性显著降低(降低2.80对数),其次是在豆浆中培养的细胞(降低2.09对数)(p < 0.05)。单核增生乳杆菌RS1的耐受性也有相似的变化趋势(杏仁奶和豆奶分别降低2.82和3.22对数)。这些发现强调了对植物性牛奶替代品等新兴食品中的微生物行为进行全面评估的必要性。随着这些替代方案的发展,确保它们的安全性和稳定性仍然很重要。随着对乳替代品中单核增生乳杆菌生长和存活的深入了解,本研究将有助于不断发展对微生物动力学的理解,以应对不断变化的饮食趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foodborne pathogens and disease
Foodborne pathogens and disease 医学-食品科技
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Foodborne Pathogens and Disease is one of the most inclusive scientific publications on the many disciplines that contribute to food safety. Spanning an array of issues from "farm-to-fork," the Journal bridges the gap between science and policy to reduce the burden of foodborne illness worldwide. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease coverage includes: Agroterrorism Safety of organically grown and genetically modified foods Emerging pathogens Emergence of drug resistance Methods and technology for rapid and accurate detection Strategies to destroy or control foodborne pathogens Novel strategies for the prevention and control of plant and animal diseases that impact food safety Biosecurity issues and the implications of new regulatory guidelines Impact of changing lifestyles and consumer demands on food safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信