The State of STEMI Care Across NSW: A Comparison of Rural, Regional, and Metropolitan Centres.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ruth Arnold, Georgina M Luscombe, Ryan Gadeley, Sarah Edwards, Estelle Ryan, Steven Faddy, Gabrielle Larnach, Harry Lowe, Andrew Boyle, Catherine Hawke, Alex Elder, Mark Adams, David Amos
{"title":"The State of STEMI Care Across NSW: A Comparison of Rural, Regional, and Metropolitan Centres.","authors":"Ruth Arnold, Georgina M Luscombe, Ryan Gadeley, Sarah Edwards, Estelle Ryan, Steven Faddy, Gabrielle Larnach, Harry Lowe, Andrew Boyle, Catherine Hawke, Alex Elder, Mark Adams, David Amos","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2024.07.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At a global level, regional variation in the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is influenced by patient demographics and geography. Rural patients with STEMI are disadvantaged in reaching timely care owing to distance and limited ambulance and healthcare resources. Optimising models of STEMI care is key to overcoming the excess rural vs metropolitan cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In this descriptive study, we compare patient characteristics and STEMI management in three Local Health Districts (LHDs) across NSW: a rural LHD (Western NSW [WNSWLHD]), a regional LHD (Hunter New England), and a metropolitan site (Sydney LHD).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected from file audits conducted from 2019 to 2020 in a rural LHD with a single rural 24/7 cardiac catheter laboratory (WNSWLHD), a regional LHD with a part-time rural cardiac catheter laboratory, and a large regional 24/7 cardiac centre (Hunter New England LHD), and a metropolitan site (Sydney LHD), with two 24/7 cardiac centres. Patients with STEMI presenting in the three geographic regions were compared on demographics, differences in presentation, time to reperfusion treatment, time to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centre, distances travelled, proportion of angiograms within 24 hours, and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 2020, there were 675 recorded STEMI across the three regions. The rural site in WNSWLHD had the highest rate of STEMI per capita, with patients more likely to identify as Indigenous, less likely to call an ambulance, and more likely to present to a non-PCI hospital and to receive thrombolysis. Only 14% of these rural patients received primary PCI (PPCI), with patients presenting a median of 153 km from the PCI centre, vs 69% PPCI in the regional and 89% in metropolitan LHD. Thrombolysis was the main reperfusion treatment in WNSWLHD (76%), and the proportion of patients receiving no treatment was the same in all LHDs at 10%. The percentage of patients receiving angiography within 24 hours in the rural site was 84%. There was no substantial difference in in-hospital mortality among the three LHDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We document large differences in the demographic profiles, use of ambulance, and access to PPCI in patients with STEMI across the three NSW centres. Current NSW health and ambulance protocols in a large, sparsely populated rural NSW LHD were able to deliver thrombolysis at the point of contact and facilitate \"hot\" transfer of patients with STEMI to a PCI centre. Long distances and transfer times mean that PPCI is a limited option in rural NSW, with scope for further improvement in models of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2024.07.016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: At a global level, regional variation in the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is influenced by patient demographics and geography. Rural patients with STEMI are disadvantaged in reaching timely care owing to distance and limited ambulance and healthcare resources. Optimising models of STEMI care is key to overcoming the excess rural vs metropolitan cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In this descriptive study, we compare patient characteristics and STEMI management in three Local Health Districts (LHDs) across NSW: a rural LHD (Western NSW [WNSWLHD]), a regional LHD (Hunter New England), and a metropolitan site (Sydney LHD).

Method: Data were collected from file audits conducted from 2019 to 2020 in a rural LHD with a single rural 24/7 cardiac catheter laboratory (WNSWLHD), a regional LHD with a part-time rural cardiac catheter laboratory, and a large regional 24/7 cardiac centre (Hunter New England LHD), and a metropolitan site (Sydney LHD), with two 24/7 cardiac centres. Patients with STEMI presenting in the three geographic regions were compared on demographics, differences in presentation, time to reperfusion treatment, time to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centre, distances travelled, proportion of angiograms within 24 hours, and in-hospital mortality.

Results: During 2020, there were 675 recorded STEMI across the three regions. The rural site in WNSWLHD had the highest rate of STEMI per capita, with patients more likely to identify as Indigenous, less likely to call an ambulance, and more likely to present to a non-PCI hospital and to receive thrombolysis. Only 14% of these rural patients received primary PCI (PPCI), with patients presenting a median of 153 km from the PCI centre, vs 69% PPCI in the regional and 89% in metropolitan LHD. Thrombolysis was the main reperfusion treatment in WNSWLHD (76%), and the proportion of patients receiving no treatment was the same in all LHDs at 10%. The percentage of patients receiving angiography within 24 hours in the rural site was 84%. There was no substantial difference in in-hospital mortality among the three LHDs.

Conclusions: We document large differences in the demographic profiles, use of ambulance, and access to PPCI in patients with STEMI across the three NSW centres. Current NSW health and ambulance protocols in a large, sparsely populated rural NSW LHD were able to deliver thrombolysis at the point of contact and facilitate "hot" transfer of patients with STEMI to a PCI centre. Long distances and transfer times mean that PPCI is a limited option in rural NSW, with scope for further improvement in models of care.

新南威尔士州的STEMI护理状况:农村、地区和大都市中心的比较。
背景:在全球范围内,st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)治疗的区域差异受患者人口统计学和地理因素的影响。由于距离远,救护车和医疗资源有限,农村STEMI患者在获得及时护理方面处于不利地位。优化STEMI护理模式是克服农村与城市心血管发病率和死亡率过高的关键。在这项描述性研究中,我们比较了新南威尔士州三个地方卫生区(LHD)的患者特征和STEMI管理:农村LHD(新南威尔士州西部[WNSWLHD]),区域LHD(新英格兰亨特)和大都市站点(悉尼LHD)。方法:从2019年至2020年进行的文件审计中收集数据,这些审计包括一个拥有单一农村24/7心导管实验室(WNSWLHD)的农村LHD、一个拥有兼职农村心导管实验室的区域LHD、一个大型区域24/7心脏中心(亨特新英格兰LHD)和一个拥有两个24/7心脏中心的大都市LHD(悉尼LHD)。比较三个地理区域的STEMI患者的人口统计学特征、表现差异、到再灌注治疗的时间、到经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中心的时间、旅行距离、24小时内血管造影比例和住院死亡率。结果:2020年,三个地区共记录了675例STEMI。WNSWLHD的农村地区人均STEMI发生率最高,患者更有可能认为自己是原住民,更不可能叫救护车,更有可能到非pci医院就诊并接受溶栓治疗。这些农村患者中只有14%接受了初级PCI (PPCI),患者的中位数距离PCI中心153公里,而地区患者的PPCI为69%,大都市LHD为89%。溶栓是WNSWLHD的主要再灌注治疗方法(76%),未接受治疗的患者比例在所有lhd中相同,均为10%。农村地区24小时内接受血管造影的患者比例为84%。三种低死亡率患者的住院死亡率无显著差异。结论:我们记录了三个NSW中心的STEMI患者在人口统计资料、救护车使用和PPCI获取方面的巨大差异。在新南威尔士州人口稀少的大型农村地区,目前的新南威尔士州卫生和救护车协议能够在接触点提供溶栓治疗,并促进STEMI患者“热”转移到PCI中心。路途遥远,转诊时间长,这意味着PPCI在新南威尔士州农村地区是一种有限的选择,在护理模式方面还有进一步改进的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信