Contactless and continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in a hospital ward: a clinical validation study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2024-11-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1502413
Ståle Toften, Jonas T Kjellstadli, Jørn Kværness, Line Pedersen, Lars E Laugsand, Ole K F Thu
{"title":"Contactless and continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in a hospital ward: a clinical validation study.","authors":"Ståle Toften, Jonas T Kjellstadli, Jørn Kværness, Line Pedersen, Lars E Laugsand, Ole K F Thu","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1502413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in hospital wards can provide early detection of clinical deterioration, thereby reducing mortality, reducing transfers to intensive care units, and reducing the hospital length of stay. Despite the advantages of continuous monitoring, manually counting every 1-12 h remains the standard of care in most hospital wards. The objective of this study was to validate continuous respiratory rate measurements from a radar-based contactless patient monitor [Vitalthings Guardian M10 (Vitalthings AS, Norway)] in a hospital ward.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06083272) was conducted at the emergency ward of a university hospital. Adult patients were monitored during rest with Vitalthings Guardian M10 in both a stationary and mobile configuration simultaneously with a reference device [Nox T3s (Nox Medical, Alpharetta, GA, United States)]. The agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical alarms were evaluated using a Clarke Error grid modified for continuous monitoring of respiratory rate. Clinical aspects were further evaluated in terms of trend analysis and examination of gaps between valid measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 patients were monitored for a median duration of 42 min [IQR (range) 35-46 (30-59 min)]. The bias was 0.1 and 0.0 breaths min<sup>-1</sup> and the 95% limits of agreement ranged from -1.1 to 1.2 and -1.1 to 1.1 breaths min<sup>-1</sup> for the stationary and mobile configuration, respectively. The concordances for trends were 96%. No clinical alarms were missed, and no false alarms or technical alarms were generated. No interval without a valid measurement was longer than 5 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vitalthings Guardian M10 measured respiratory rate accurately and continuously in resting patients in a hospital ward.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1502413"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1502413","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in hospital wards can provide early detection of clinical deterioration, thereby reducing mortality, reducing transfers to intensive care units, and reducing the hospital length of stay. Despite the advantages of continuous monitoring, manually counting every 1-12 h remains the standard of care in most hospital wards. The objective of this study was to validate continuous respiratory rate measurements from a radar-based contactless patient monitor [Vitalthings Guardian M10 (Vitalthings AS, Norway)] in a hospital ward.

Methods: An observational study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06083272) was conducted at the emergency ward of a university hospital. Adult patients were monitored during rest with Vitalthings Guardian M10 in both a stationary and mobile configuration simultaneously with a reference device [Nox T3s (Nox Medical, Alpharetta, GA, United States)]. The agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical alarms were evaluated using a Clarke Error grid modified for continuous monitoring of respiratory rate. Clinical aspects were further evaluated in terms of trend analysis and examination of gaps between valid measurements.

Results: 32 patients were monitored for a median duration of 42 min [IQR (range) 35-46 (30-59 min)]. The bias was 0.1 and 0.0 breaths min-1 and the 95% limits of agreement ranged from -1.1 to 1.2 and -1.1 to 1.1 breaths min-1 for the stationary and mobile configuration, respectively. The concordances for trends were 96%. No clinical alarms were missed, and no false alarms or technical alarms were generated. No interval without a valid measurement was longer than 5 min.

Conclusion: Vitalthings Guardian M10 measured respiratory rate accurately and continuously in resting patients in a hospital ward.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信