Predicting blood loss volume in a canine model of hemorrhagic shock using arterial waveform machine learning analysis.

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Thomas Edwards, Jose M Gonzalez, Sofia Hernandez-Torres, Emilee Venn, Rebekah Ford, Nicole Ewer, Guillaume L Hoareau, Lawrence Holland, Victor A Convertino, Eric Snider
{"title":"Predicting blood loss volume in a canine model of hemorrhagic shock using arterial waveform machine learning analysis.","authors":"Thomas Edwards, Jose M Gonzalez, Sofia Hernandez-Torres, Emilee Venn, Rebekah Ford, Nicole Ewer, Guillaume L Hoareau, Lawrence Holland, Victor A Convertino, Eric Snider","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.09.0256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if the compensatory reserve algorithm validated in humans can be applied to canines. Our secondary objective was to determine if a simpler waveform analysis could predict the percentage of blood loss volume.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>6 purpose-bred, anesthetized dogs underwent 5 rounds of controlled hemorrhage and resuscitation while continuously recording invasive arterial blood pressure waveforms in this prospective, experimental study. We calculated human compensatory reserve using deep learning (hCRM-DL) and machine learning (hCRM-ML) models previously developed with human data. We trained a metric to track blood loss volume using features extracted from canine (c) arterial waveforms as an input.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When applied to the 6 dogs, the hCRM-DL model (R2 = 0.38) more poorly fit a linear regression model against mean arterial pressure and had lower area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC; 0.60) compared to the hCRM-ML model (R2 = 0.61; AUROC, 0.73). Conversely, the arterial waveform analysis for canine blood loss volume metric (cBLVM) predicted blood loss in dogs experiencing controlled hemorrhagic shock more accurately (R2 = 0.74). The cBLVM model for predicting blood loss volume had the highest AUROC score (0.81) and was the earliest indicator of hemorrhage onset.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The hCRM-ML and hCRM-DL algorithms did not translate to accurate prediction of the onset of hemorrhagic shock in dogs. However, the arterial waveform feature analysis-derived cBLVM might provide decision support to resuscitate dogs with hemorrhagic shock.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Canine BLVM may be useful in estimating blood loss in dogs, which can guide resuscitation strategies for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.09.0256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine if the compensatory reserve algorithm validated in humans can be applied to canines. Our secondary objective was to determine if a simpler waveform analysis could predict the percentage of blood loss volume.

Methods: 6 purpose-bred, anesthetized dogs underwent 5 rounds of controlled hemorrhage and resuscitation while continuously recording invasive arterial blood pressure waveforms in this prospective, experimental study. We calculated human compensatory reserve using deep learning (hCRM-DL) and machine learning (hCRM-ML) models previously developed with human data. We trained a metric to track blood loss volume using features extracted from canine (c) arterial waveforms as an input.

Results: When applied to the 6 dogs, the hCRM-DL model (R2 = 0.38) more poorly fit a linear regression model against mean arterial pressure and had lower area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC; 0.60) compared to the hCRM-ML model (R2 = 0.61; AUROC, 0.73). Conversely, the arterial waveform analysis for canine blood loss volume metric (cBLVM) predicted blood loss in dogs experiencing controlled hemorrhagic shock more accurately (R2 = 0.74). The cBLVM model for predicting blood loss volume had the highest AUROC score (0.81) and was the earliest indicator of hemorrhage onset.

Conclusions: The hCRM-ML and hCRM-DL algorithms did not translate to accurate prediction of the onset of hemorrhagic shock in dogs. However, the arterial waveform feature analysis-derived cBLVM might provide decision support to resuscitate dogs with hemorrhagic shock.

Clinical relevance: Canine BLVM may be useful in estimating blood loss in dogs, which can guide resuscitation strategies for these patients.

利用动脉波形机器学习分析预测犬失血性休克模型的失血量。
目的:确定在人类身上验证的代偿储备算法是否可以应用于犬。我们的第二个目的是确定一个简单的波形分析是否可以预测失血量的百分比。方法:对6只麻醉犬进行5轮控制出血和复苏,同时连续记录有创动脉血压波形,进行前瞻性实验研究。我们使用深度学习(hcr - dl)和机器学习(hcr - ml)模型计算了人类代偿储备,这些模型之前是用人类数据开发的。我们训练了一个度量来跟踪失血量,使用从犬(c)动脉波形中提取的特征作为输入。结果:应用于6只犬时,hcr - dl模型(R2 = 0.38)与平均动脉压的线性回归模型拟合较差,受试者工作特征下面积(AUROC;0.60)与hcr - ml模型相比(R2 = 0.61;AUROC, 0.73)。相反,犬失血量测量(cBLVM)的动脉波形分析更准确地预测出血性休克犬的失血量(R2 = 0.74)。预测失血量的cBLVM模型AUROC评分最高(0.81),是出血发生的最早指标。结论:hcr - ml和hcr - dl算法不能准确预测狗失血性休克的发生。然而,动脉波形特征分析衍生的cBLVM可能为失血性休克狗的复苏提供决策支持。临床意义:犬BLVM可能有助于估计狗的失血,这可以指导这些患者的复苏策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信