Optimum legume proportion for plant and animal production in a subtropical grassland

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Crop Science Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1002/csc2.21426
Nicolas Caram, Lynn E. Sollenberger, Marcelo O. Wallau, Jose C. B. Dubeux Jr., Nicolas DiLorenzo
{"title":"Optimum legume proportion for plant and animal production in a subtropical grassland","authors":"Nicolas Caram,&nbsp;Lynn E. Sollenberger,&nbsp;Marcelo O. Wallau,&nbsp;Jose C. B. Dubeux Jr.,&nbsp;Nicolas DiLorenzo","doi":"10.1002/csc2.21426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Integrating legumes into grass pastures is an alternative to nitrogen (N) fertilizer for improving productive, economic, and environmental performance of grazing systems. However, optimal legume proportion for maximizing resource-use efficiency in mixed pastures is seldom considered. Here, we studied the effect of rhizoma peanut (<i>Arachis glabrata</i> Benth.) proportion in bahiagrass (<i>Paspalum notatum</i> Flügge) pastures on herbage accumulation and nutritive value, cattle selectivity, and animal gain using a Bayesian probabilistic approach for 2 years. Two 0.5-ha bahiagrass monoculture pastures receiving no N fertilizer and six 0.5-ha bahiagrass-rhizoma peanut pastures (16.5%–49.2% legume) were continuously stocked at a herbage allowance of 1.5 kg dry matter (DM) kg<sup>−1</sup> animal live weight. Regressing plant and animal production on legume proportion in the pasture, we found that responses increased non-linearly and were maximized at ∼40% legume. Herbage accumulation was maximized at 39% legume, being 173% greater than the bahiagrass monoculture (9.0 vs. 3.3 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> DM). At 39% legume, herbage in vitro digestible organic matter and crude protein concentrations were 543 and 136 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, 43% and 84% greater than at 0% legume (381 and 74 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively), and legume in cattle diets was 20 percentage units greater than offered. These data explain in part why average daily gain and gain per hectare were maximized at ∼36% legume, being 108% (604 vs. 290 g day<sup>−1</sup>) and 127% greater (350 vs. 154 kg LW ha<sup>−1</sup>) than for animals grazing the monoculture. In conclusion, legume proportions of 30%–40% maximized plant and animal production of this subtropical grassland.</p>","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.21426","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating legumes into grass pastures is an alternative to nitrogen (N) fertilizer for improving productive, economic, and environmental performance of grazing systems. However, optimal legume proportion for maximizing resource-use efficiency in mixed pastures is seldom considered. Here, we studied the effect of rhizoma peanut (Arachis glabrata Benth.) proportion in bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flügge) pastures on herbage accumulation and nutritive value, cattle selectivity, and animal gain using a Bayesian probabilistic approach for 2 years. Two 0.5-ha bahiagrass monoculture pastures receiving no N fertilizer and six 0.5-ha bahiagrass-rhizoma peanut pastures (16.5%–49.2% legume) were continuously stocked at a herbage allowance of 1.5 kg dry matter (DM) kg−1 animal live weight. Regressing plant and animal production on legume proportion in the pasture, we found that responses increased non-linearly and were maximized at ∼40% legume. Herbage accumulation was maximized at 39% legume, being 173% greater than the bahiagrass monoculture (9.0 vs. 3.3 Mg ha−1 DM). At 39% legume, herbage in vitro digestible organic matter and crude protein concentrations were 543 and 136 g kg−1, respectively, 43% and 84% greater than at 0% legume (381 and 74 g kg−1, respectively), and legume in cattle diets was 20 percentage units greater than offered. These data explain in part why average daily gain and gain per hectare were maximized at ∼36% legume, being 108% (604 vs. 290 g day−1) and 127% greater (350 vs. 154 kg LW ha−1) than for animals grazing the monoculture. In conclusion, legume proportions of 30%–40% maximized plant and animal production of this subtropical grassland.

亚热带草原动植物生产中豆科植物的最佳比例
在草场中种植豆科植物是氮肥的替代品,可以提高放牧系统的生产、经济和环境绩效。然而,混交牧草资源利用效率最大化的最佳豆科牧草比例却很少被考虑。本研究采用贝叶斯概率方法,历时2年研究了百喜草(Paspalum notatum fl gge)牧场中花生根(Arachis glabrata Benth.)配比对牧草积累和营养价值、牛选择性和动物增重的影响。以1.5 kg干物质(DM) kg - 1动物活重为补料,连续放养2个不施氮肥的0.5 ha百喜草单作牧场和6个0.5 ha百喜草-根茎花生牧场(豆科植物16.5% ~ 49.2%)。通过对牧场中豆类比例的动植物产量进行回归,我们发现响应呈非线性增长,在豆类比例达到40%时达到最大。豆科含量为39%时,牧草积累量最大,比单栽百喜草多173% (9.0 vs 3.3 Mg ha−1 DM)。饲粮中豆蔻含量为39%时,牧草体外可消化有机质和粗蛋白质浓度分别为543和136 g kg - 1,比饲粮中豆蔻含量为0%时(分别为381和74 g kg - 1)分别高出43%和84%,比饲粮中豆蔻含量高出20个单位。这些数据在一定程度上解释了为什么豆科植物含量为36%时,平均日增重和每公顷增重最大,比单一栽培的动物高108%(604对290 g day - 1)和127%(350对154 kg LW ha - 1)。综上所述,30% ~ 40%的豆科植物比例可使该亚热带草原的动植物产量最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Science
Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信