AMMI and GGE biplot analysis of seed protein concentration, yield, and 100-seed weight for chickpea cultivars and breeding lines in the US Pacific Northwest

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Crop Science Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1002/csc2.21417
Priyanka Joshi, George Vandemark
{"title":"AMMI and GGE biplot analysis of seed protein concentration, yield, and 100-seed weight for chickpea cultivars and breeding lines in the US Pacific Northwest","authors":"Priyanka Joshi,&nbsp;George Vandemark","doi":"10.1002/csc2.21417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Greater global demand for plant-based protein has made increasing protein concentration in chickpea (<i>Cicer arietinum</i> L.) an important breeding objective. In this study, 17 kabuli chickpea genotypes were evaluated for seed protein concentration (SPC), yield, and 100-seed weight (HSW). All entries were planted in 2020 and 2021 at four locations in Washington. The mean of all entries for SPC was 20.3%. Genotype (G), location (L), G × year (Y), and L × Y (E) effects were significant for each trait. Year (Y) effects were significant for SPC and yield and accounted for the greatest percentage of total variance for both traits. Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions and genotype (G) main effects and genotype (G) × environment (E) interaction (GGE) biplot analyses were used to identify stable genotypes and to dissect GEI in chickpea. GGE biplot analysis indicated G + G × E effects accounted for 78.69%, 64.01%, and 95.99% of the total variation for SPC, yield, and HSW, respectively. Environments tended to be positively correlated for all three traits and biplot analysis suggests three mega-environments. Three genotypes, CA0790B0429C, CA13900147C, and Sierra, consistently had high SPC but low yield. Billy Beans was superior for yield. Nash and CA15940057C consistently had high HSW. No genotype had high SPC, yield, and HSW. Significant positive correlations (<i>r</i> &gt; 0.6) were observed between SPC, days to mature, and plant height. It will be challenging to make substantial gains in SPC using only the genotypes evaluated in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csc2.21417","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.21417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Greater global demand for plant-based protein has made increasing protein concentration in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) an important breeding objective. In this study, 17 kabuli chickpea genotypes were evaluated for seed protein concentration (SPC), yield, and 100-seed weight (HSW). All entries were planted in 2020 and 2021 at four locations in Washington. The mean of all entries for SPC was 20.3%. Genotype (G), location (L), G × year (Y), and L × Y (E) effects were significant for each trait. Year (Y) effects were significant for SPC and yield and accounted for the greatest percentage of total variance for both traits. Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions and genotype (G) main effects and genotype (G) × environment (E) interaction (GGE) biplot analyses were used to identify stable genotypes and to dissect GEI in chickpea. GGE biplot analysis indicated G + G × E effects accounted for 78.69%, 64.01%, and 95.99% of the total variation for SPC, yield, and HSW, respectively. Environments tended to be positively correlated for all three traits and biplot analysis suggests three mega-environments. Three genotypes, CA0790B0429C, CA13900147C, and Sierra, consistently had high SPC but low yield. Billy Beans was superior for yield. Nash and CA15940057C consistently had high HSW. No genotype had high SPC, yield, and HSW. Significant positive correlations (r > 0.6) were observed between SPC, days to mature, and plant height. It will be challenging to make substantial gains in SPC using only the genotypes evaluated in this study.

Abstract Image

美国西北太平洋地区鹰嘴豆品种和选种系种子蛋白浓度、产量和百粒重的AMMI和GGE双图分析
全球对植物蛋白的需求日益增长,使得提高鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)蛋白浓度成为一个重要的育种目标。本研究对17个卡布力鹰嘴豆基因型的种子蛋白浓度(SPC)、产量和百粒重(HSW)进行了评价。所有参赛作品分别于2020年和2021年在华盛顿的四个地点种植。所有SPC条目的平均值为20.3%。基因型(G)、位置(L)、G × Y (Y)和L × Y (E)对各性状的影响均显著。年(Y)效应显著的SPC和产量和占最大的百分比,总方差的两个性状。采用加性主效应和增殖相互作用以及基因型(G)主效应和基因型(G) ×环境(E)相互作用(GGE)双图分析方法鉴定了鹰嘴豆的稳定基因型,解剖了鹰嘴豆的GEI。GGE双图分析显示,G + G × E效应分别占SPC、产量和HSW总变异的78.69%、64.01%和95.99%。环境对这三种性状都有正相关的倾向,双图分析表明存在三个大环境。CA0790B0429C、CA13900147C和Sierra三种基因型均具有较高的SPC而较低的产量。比利豆的产量更高。Nash和CA15940057C始终具有较高的HSW。没有基因型具有高SPC、产量和高HSW。显著正相关(r >;在SPC、成熟天数和株高之间的差异为0.6)。仅使用本研究中评估的基因型在SPC中取得实质性进展将是具有挑战性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Science
Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信