Effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation on depressive symptoms targeting prefrontal cortex in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies: a combined systematic review and meta-analysis.

Psychoradiology Pub Date : 2024-11-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/psyrad/kkae025
Yao Xiao, Shuai Dong, Chunyu Pan, Huiling Guo, Lili Tang, Xizhe Zhang, Fei Wang
{"title":"Effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation on depressive symptoms targeting prefrontal cortex in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies: a combined systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yao Xiao, Shuai Dong, Chunyu Pan, Huiling Guo, Lili Tang, Xizhe Zhang, Fei Wang","doi":"10.1093/psyrad/kkae025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is a critical non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) target for treating depression. However, the alterations of brain activations post-intervention remain inconsistent and the clinical moderators that could improve symptomatic effectiveness are unclear. The study aim was to systematically review the effectiveness of NIBS on depressive symptoms targeting PFC in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. In our study, we delivered a combined activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis and meta-regression. Until November 2020, three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE) were searched and 14 studies with a total sample size of 584 were included in the ALE meta-analysis; after NIBS, four clusters in left cerebrum revealed significant activation while two clusters in right cerebrum revealed significant deactivation (<i>P</i> < 0.001, cluster size >150 mm<sup>3</sup>). Eleven studies were statistically reanalyzed for depressive symptoms pre-post active-NIBS and the pooled effect size was very large [(<i>d</i> = 1.82, 95%CI (1.23, 2.40)]; significant moderators causing substantial heterogeneity (Chi squared = 75.25, <i>P</i> < 0.01; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 87%) were detected through subgroup analysis and univariate meta-regression. Multivariate meta-regression was then conducted accordingly and the model suggested good fitness (<i>Q</i> = 42.32, <i>P</i> < 0.01). In all, NIBS targeting PFC balanced three core depressive-related neurocognitive networks (the salience network, the default mode network, and the central executive network); the striatum played a central role and might serve as a candidate treatment biomarker; gender difference, treatment-resistant condition, comorbidity, treatment duration, and localization all contributed to moderating depressive symptoms during NIBS. More high-quality, multi-center randomized controlled trails delivering personalized NIBS are needed for clinical practice in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":93496,"journal":{"name":"Psychoradiology","volume":"4 ","pages":"kkae025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/psyrad/kkae025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is a critical non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) target for treating depression. However, the alterations of brain activations post-intervention remain inconsistent and the clinical moderators that could improve symptomatic effectiveness are unclear. The study aim was to systematically review the effectiveness of NIBS on depressive symptoms targeting PFC in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. In our study, we delivered a combined activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis and meta-regression. Until November 2020, three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE) were searched and 14 studies with a total sample size of 584 were included in the ALE meta-analysis; after NIBS, four clusters in left cerebrum revealed significant activation while two clusters in right cerebrum revealed significant deactivation (P < 0.001, cluster size >150 mm3). Eleven studies were statistically reanalyzed for depressive symptoms pre-post active-NIBS and the pooled effect size was very large [(d = 1.82, 95%CI (1.23, 2.40)]; significant moderators causing substantial heterogeneity (Chi squared = 75.25, P < 0.01; I 2 = 87%) were detected through subgroup analysis and univariate meta-regression. Multivariate meta-regression was then conducted accordingly and the model suggested good fitness (Q = 42.32, P < 0.01). In all, NIBS targeting PFC balanced three core depressive-related neurocognitive networks (the salience network, the default mode network, and the central executive network); the striatum played a central role and might serve as a candidate treatment biomarker; gender difference, treatment-resistant condition, comorbidity, treatment duration, and localization all contributed to moderating depressive symptoms during NIBS. More high-quality, multi-center randomized controlled trails delivering personalized NIBS are needed for clinical practice in the future.

在功能性磁共振成像研究中,针对前额叶皮层的无创脑刺激对抑郁症状的有效性:一项综合系统回顾和荟萃分析。
前额叶皮层(PFC)是治疗抑郁症的非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)的关键靶点。然而,干预后脑激活的改变仍然不一致,可以改善症状有效性的临床调节因子尚不清楚。本研究旨在系统回顾NIBS在功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究中针对PFC治疗抑郁症状的有效性。在我们的研究中,我们提供了一个联合的激活似然估计(ALE)元分析和元回归。截至2020年11月,检索了三个数据库(PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE),并将14项研究(总样本量为584)纳入ALE meta分析;NIBS后,左脑4个脑簇显著激活,右脑2个脑簇显著失活(P 150 mm3)。11项研究对主动nibs前后的抑郁症状进行了统计再分析,合并效应量非常大[d = 1.82, 95%CI (1.23, 2.40)];通过亚组分析和单变量元回归,发现显著调节因子导致实质性异质性(χ 2 = 75.25, χ 2 = 87%)。据此进行多元元回归,模型适应度较好(Q = 42.32, P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信