Understanding Healthcare Personnel's Perceptions About Reducing Low-Value Care: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S494013
Jiamin Li, Dan Yang
{"title":"Understanding Healthcare Personnel's Perceptions About Reducing Low-Value Care: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Jiamin Li, Dan Yang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S494013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically and comprehensively search the studies describing healthcare personnel's perceptions about reducing low-value care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Evidence sources included PubMed, ProQuest and CINAHL databases from inception to 13th September 2023, along with grey literature, expert suggestions and reference lists from the included articles. Studies were included if they contained information about healthcare personnel's perceptions and involvement in reducing low-value care. The extracted data included general study characteristics, the type of low-value care of interest, clinical settings, and main findings related to healthcare personnel's perceptions. Three frameworks were used to guide the data synthesis. First, the main findings from the included studies were mapped onto the Process of De-adoption Framework to capture the aspects of low-value care that healthcare personnel focused on, including the identification of low-value care, barriers and facilitators to reducing low-value care, and intervention strategies. The identified barriers and facilitators were then mapped onto the relevant domains of the <i>Theoretical Domains Framework</i>. Finally, the intervention strategies, as informed by healthcare personnel's perceptions, were mapped to the <i>Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care taxonomy framework</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 37 included studies were those published since 2011. Of these, 15 studies were conducted in the United States. Most included studies (n = 19) described low-value care not specific to a care measure. Twelve of the included studies described healthcare personnel's perceptions regarding the identification of low-value care, 34 studies described healthcare personnel's perceptions regarding influence factors to reducing low-value care and 18 studies described healthcare personnel's perceptions regarding intervention strategies to reduce low-value care. \"Knowledge\" (n = 16) and 'environmental context and resources' (n = 16) were the most common influence factors of reducing low-value care. \"Education\" was the most commonly discussed intervention strategy for reducing low-value care (n = 14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Healthcare personnel's perceptions focused on identifying low-value care, barriers and facilitators of reducing low-value care and intervention strategies to reduce low-value care. Education was potentially the main effect of the intervention strategies in addressing lack of knowledge, which is the main barrier to reducing low-value care. Future research should develop and implement intervention strategies to reduce low-value care based on healthcare personnel's perceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"17 ","pages":"3029-3047"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S494013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To systematically and comprehensively search the studies describing healthcare personnel's perceptions about reducing low-value care.

Design: Scoping review.

Methods: Evidence sources included PubMed, ProQuest and CINAHL databases from inception to 13th September 2023, along with grey literature, expert suggestions and reference lists from the included articles. Studies were included if they contained information about healthcare personnel's perceptions and involvement in reducing low-value care. The extracted data included general study characteristics, the type of low-value care of interest, clinical settings, and main findings related to healthcare personnel's perceptions. Three frameworks were used to guide the data synthesis. First, the main findings from the included studies were mapped onto the Process of De-adoption Framework to capture the aspects of low-value care that healthcare personnel focused on, including the identification of low-value care, barriers and facilitators to reducing low-value care, and intervention strategies. The identified barriers and facilitators were then mapped onto the relevant domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework. Finally, the intervention strategies, as informed by healthcare personnel's perceptions, were mapped to the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care taxonomy framework.

Results: The 37 included studies were those published since 2011. Of these, 15 studies were conducted in the United States. Most included studies (n = 19) described low-value care not specific to a care measure. Twelve of the included studies described healthcare personnel's perceptions regarding the identification of low-value care, 34 studies described healthcare personnel's perceptions regarding influence factors to reducing low-value care and 18 studies described healthcare personnel's perceptions regarding intervention strategies to reduce low-value care. "Knowledge" (n = 16) and 'environmental context and resources' (n = 16) were the most common influence factors of reducing low-value care. "Education" was the most commonly discussed intervention strategy for reducing low-value care (n = 14).

Conclusion: Healthcare personnel's perceptions focused on identifying low-value care, barriers and facilitators of reducing low-value care and intervention strategies to reduce low-value care. Education was potentially the main effect of the intervention strategies in addressing lack of knowledge, which is the main barrier to reducing low-value care. Future research should develop and implement intervention strategies to reduce low-value care based on healthcare personnel's perceptions.

了解医护人员对减少低价值护理的看法:一项范围审查。
目的:系统、全面地检索有关医护人员减少低价值护理观念的研究。设计:范围审查。方法:证据来源包括PubMed、ProQuest和CINAHL数据库,起始时间为2023年9月13日,以及灰色文献、专家建议和参考文献列表。如果研究包含有关医护人员对减少低价值护理的看法和参与的信息,则纳入研究。提取的数据包括一般研究特征、感兴趣的低价值护理类型、临床环境和与医护人员感知相关的主要发现。使用了三个框架来指导数据综合。首先,将纳入研究的主要发现映射到“去采用过程框架”中,以捕捉医疗保健人员关注的低价值护理方面,包括低价值护理的识别、减少低价值护理的障碍和促进因素,以及干预策略。然后将确定的障碍和促进因素映射到理论领域框架的相关领域。最后,根据医护人员的感知,将干预策略映射到Cochrane有效实践和护理组织分类框架中。结果:纳入的37项研究均为2011年以来发表的研究。其中,15项研究是在美国进行的。大多数纳入的研究(n = 19)描述了低价值护理,而不是特定于护理措施。其中12项研究描述了医护人员对低价值护理识别的看法,34项研究描述了医护人员对减少低价值护理影响因素的看法,18项研究描述了医护人员对减少低价值护理干预策略的看法。“知识”(n = 16)和“环境背景和资源”(n = 16)是减少低价值护理的最常见影响因素。“教育”是减少低价值护理最常讨论的干预策略(n = 14)。结论:医护人员的认知主要集中在识别低价值护理、减少低价值护理的障碍和促进因素以及减少低价值护理的干预策略。教育可能是解决缺乏知识的干预策略的主要效果,这是减少低价值护理的主要障碍。未来的研究应制定和实施干预策略,以减少低价值护理基于医护人员的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信