Gait recovery in patients with late assessment of incomplete spinal cord injury: A retrospective study in Argentina.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Marcelo A Gatti, Yamila Dieni, Lucia Yaccuzzi, María E Rivas, Daniela G L Terson de Paleville
{"title":"Gait recovery in patients with late assessment of incomplete spinal cord injury: A retrospective study in Argentina.","authors":"Marcelo A Gatti, Yamila Dieni, Lucia Yaccuzzi, María E Rivas, Daniela G L Terson de Paleville","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2434304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective data analysis study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess gait recovery rates in subjects with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) at the start of rehabilitation and to report their gait performance.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary inpatient Rehabilitation Center in Argentina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study analyzed data from 143 individuals with traumatic and non-traumatic SCI (AIS/ASIA Impairment Scale C and D) within 90 days of injury, all non-ambulatory upon admission. Gait status at discharge was evaluated using the 6-minute walk test and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II). Statistical evaluations utilized Pearson chi-square and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Approval was obtained from Fleni's Ethics Committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 65 patients with AIS C, 69% regained walking function, compared to 87% of the 74 patients with AIS D (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Walkers had a mean total motor score of 67 (±19) versus 51.7 (±25.5) for non-walkers (<i>p</i> = 0.002), and a total pinprick sensation score of 69.8 (± 27.5) vs. 49.5 (± 29) (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Additionally, 54% of AIS C and 86% of AIS D patients aged ≥ 50 regained walking ability; however, age-related differences were statistically significant only in AIS C group (<i>p</i> = 0,015). AIS D patients walked a mean of 249 meters (±134), while AIS C walked 207 meters (±128) (<i>p</i> = 0.07). The median WISCI II score between the two groups were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients with incomplete motor SCI who participated in inpatient rehabilitation regained walking, with motor score and pinprick sensation correlating to walking ability. Gait performance was comparable between AIS C and D.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2434304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective data analysis study.

Objectives: To assess gait recovery rates in subjects with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) at the start of rehabilitation and to report their gait performance.

Setting: Tertiary inpatient Rehabilitation Center in Argentina.

Methods: The study analyzed data from 143 individuals with traumatic and non-traumatic SCI (AIS/ASIA Impairment Scale C and D) within 90 days of injury, all non-ambulatory upon admission. Gait status at discharge was evaluated using the 6-minute walk test and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II). Statistical evaluations utilized Pearson chi-square and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Approval was obtained from Fleni's Ethics Committee.

Results: Among the 65 patients with AIS C, 69% regained walking function, compared to 87% of the 74 patients with AIS D (p = 0.01). Walkers had a mean total motor score of 67 (±19) versus 51.7 (±25.5) for non-walkers (p = 0.002), and a total pinprick sensation score of 69.8 (± 27.5) vs. 49.5 (± 29) (p = 0.001). Additionally, 54% of AIS C and 86% of AIS D patients aged ≥ 50 regained walking ability; however, age-related differences were statistically significant only in AIS C group (p = 0,015). AIS D patients walked a mean of 249 meters (±134), while AIS C walked 207 meters (±128) (p = 0.07). The median WISCI II score between the two groups were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Most patients with incomplete motor SCI who participated in inpatient rehabilitation regained walking, with motor score and pinprick sensation correlating to walking ability. Gait performance was comparable between AIS C and D.

不完全脊髓损伤晚期评估患者的步态恢复:阿根廷的一项回顾性研究。
研究设计:回顾性数据分析研究。目的:评估运动不完全性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者在康复开始时的步态恢复率,并报告其步态表现。地点:阿根廷三级住院康复中心。方法:研究分析了143例创伤性和非创伤性脊髓损伤患者(AIS/ASIA损伤量表C和D)在受伤后90天内的数据,所有患者入院时均不能走动。出院时的步态状况采用6分钟步行测试和脊髓损伤步行指数II (WISCI II)进行评估。统计评估采用Pearson卡方检验和Mann-Whitney u检验。获得了Fleni伦理委员会的批准。结果:65例AIS C患者中,69%的患者恢复了行走功能,而74例AIS D患者中87%的患者恢复了行走功能(p = 0.01)。学步者的平均总运动评分为67(±19)分,非学步者为51.7(±25.5)分(p = 0.002);针刺感觉总分为69.8(±27.5)分,非学步者为49.5(±29)分(p = 0.001)。此外,54%的≥50岁的AIS C和86%的AIS D患者恢复了行走能力;然而,年龄相关差异仅在AIS C组有统计学意义(p = 0.015)。AIS D患者平均步行249米(±134米),AIS C患者平均步行207米(±128米)(p = 0.07)。两组间WISCIⅱ评分中位数差异无统计学意义。结论:大多数参加住院康复的不完全性运动性脊髓损伤患者均能恢复行走,运动评分和针刺感觉与行走能力相关。步态表现在AIS C和D之间具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信