Feasibility and Safety of ArtiSential for Minimally Invasive Surgery in Early-stage Gynecologic Cancer: Results from the KGOG 4002/GYANT Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT Pub Date : 2024-10-21 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.4103/gmit.gmit_3_24
Ok-Ju Kang, Kidong Kim, Keun Ho Lee, Min Kyu Kim, Jong Ha Hwang, Taehun Kim, Nak Woo Lee, Kyoung Chul Chun, Seok Ju Seong, Tae-Joong Kim, Dasol Oh, Jeong-Yeol Park
{"title":"Feasibility and Safety of ArtiSential for Minimally Invasive Surgery in Early-stage Gynecologic Cancer: Results from the KGOG 4002/GYANT Study.","authors":"Ok-Ju Kang, Kidong Kim, Keun Ho Lee, Min Kyu Kim, Jong Ha Hwang, Taehun Kim, Nak Woo Lee, Kyoung Chul Chun, Seok Ju Seong, Tae-Joong Kim, Dasol Oh, Jeong-Yeol Park","doi":"10.4103/gmit.gmit_3_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of ArtiSential for performing minimally invasive surgeries for gynecological cancers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study at 10 Tertiary Institutional Hospitals in Korea between November 2021 and April 2022. Eligible patients were 18 years or older and planned to undergo minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic cancer. We collected baseline characteristics, surgical information, and postoperative outcomes. The primary endpoint was to compare the operation time required for gynecologic cancer surgery using ArtiSential with the reported operation time for surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments or robots. The secondary endpoints were to evaluate the surgical outcomes of gynecologic cancer surgery using ArtiSential compared to conventional laparoscopic instruments or robots and collect operator feedback on equipment improvements during surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients were enrolled in this study, including 19 with endometrial cancer, 15 with cervical cancer, and 6 with ovarian cancer. The average operation time was 187.0 ± 49.2 min, with no complications encountered during surgery. Pelvic lymph nodes were assessed in 34 patients, with the ArtiSential device utilized in 22 (64.7%) of these patients, at an average assessment time of 40.3 ± 19.4 min. Most surgeons using the ArtiSential device reported that it performed slightly better than conventional laparoscopic instruments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of the ArtiSential device in minimally invasive surgery has been demonstrated to be both feasible and safe for the treatment of early-stage gynecologic cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":45272,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","volume":"13 4","pages":"253-259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.gmit_3_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of ArtiSential for performing minimally invasive surgeries for gynecological cancers.

Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective observational study at 10 Tertiary Institutional Hospitals in Korea between November 2021 and April 2022. Eligible patients were 18 years or older and planned to undergo minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic cancer. We collected baseline characteristics, surgical information, and postoperative outcomes. The primary endpoint was to compare the operation time required for gynecologic cancer surgery using ArtiSential with the reported operation time for surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments or robots. The secondary endpoints were to evaluate the surgical outcomes of gynecologic cancer surgery using ArtiSential compared to conventional laparoscopic instruments or robots and collect operator feedback on equipment improvements during surgery.

Results: Forty patients were enrolled in this study, including 19 with endometrial cancer, 15 with cervical cancer, and 6 with ovarian cancer. The average operation time was 187.0 ± 49.2 min, with no complications encountered during surgery. Pelvic lymph nodes were assessed in 34 patients, with the ArtiSential device utilized in 22 (64.7%) of these patients, at an average assessment time of 40.3 ± 19.4 min. Most surgeons using the ArtiSential device reported that it performed slightly better than conventional laparoscopic instruments.

Conclusion: The use of the ArtiSential device in minimally invasive surgery has been demonstrated to be both feasible and safe for the treatment of early-stage gynecologic cancer.

早期妇科肿瘤微创手术的可行性和安全性:来自kgog4002 /GYANT研究的结果
目的:评价artiential微创妇科肿瘤手术的可行性和安全性。材料和方法:我们于2021年11月至2022年4月在韩国10家三级医院进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。符合条件的患者年龄在18岁或以上,计划接受妇科肿瘤微创手术。我们收集了基线特征、手术信息和术后结果。主要终点是比较使用artiential进行妇科癌症手术所需的手术时间与使用传统腹腔镜器械或机器人进行手术所需的手术时间。次要终点是评估使用artiential与传统腹腔镜器械或机器人进行妇科癌症手术的手术效果,并收集手术期间操作员对设备改进的反馈。结果:共纳入40例患者,其中子宫内膜癌19例,宫颈癌15例,卵巢癌6例。平均手术时间187.0±49.2 min,术中无并发症发生。对34例患者进行盆腔淋巴结评估,其中22例(64.7%)患者使用了ArtiSential器械,平均评估时间为40.3±19.4分钟。大多数使用ArtiSential器械的外科医生报告说,它的表现略好于传统腹腔镜器械。结论:在微创手术中应用该器械治疗早期妇科肿瘤是可行且安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
98
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信