Fasciocutaneous SMAS Island Flap for Large Facial Defect Reconstruction.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Simon J Madorsky, Jonah S Brand, Orr A Meltzer
{"title":"Fasciocutaneous SMAS Island Flap for Large Facial Defect Reconstruction.","authors":"Simon J Madorsky, Jonah S Brand, Orr A Meltzer","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Large cutaneous defects of the face have traditionally been reconstructed with cervicofacial rotation flaps. <b>Objective:</b> To measure advancing distance and assess vascular reliability of superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) island flaps for reconstruction of large cutaneous facial defects. <b>Methods:</b> The study design was a retrospective case series of all patients who had undergone reconstruction of facial defects 3 cm or greater with fasciocutaneous SMAS island flaps from 2009 to 2023. Flap advancing distance and vascular compromise were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> The average patient age at the time of surgery was 69 (standard deviation [SD] 15) years with more males (<i>n</i> = 33, 92%) than females (<i>n</i> = 3, 8%). Of 36 patients, 18 had posterior defects, 16 had anterior defects, and 2 had defects straddling both regions. Fifteen cases had a full fasciocutaneous SMAS island flap, and 21 underwent the partial island modification. Flap ischemia occurred in three cases (8%). The mean flap advancing distance was 3.8 cm (SD 1.1). Of the 5 smokers, none had ischemia of the flap. The median follow-up time was 2 years (range 12-3,170 days). <b>Conclusions:</b> Fasciocutaneous SMAS island and partial island flaps are reliable options for the reconstruction of large cheek defects (3 cm or greater). Anterior pedicle blood supply is more reliable for defects anterior to the line from the lateral brow to the angle of the mandible, whereas the posterior pedicle is a better choice for defects posterior to that line.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0194","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Large cutaneous defects of the face have traditionally been reconstructed with cervicofacial rotation flaps. Objective: To measure advancing distance and assess vascular reliability of superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) island flaps for reconstruction of large cutaneous facial defects. Methods: The study design was a retrospective case series of all patients who had undergone reconstruction of facial defects 3 cm or greater with fasciocutaneous SMAS island flaps from 2009 to 2023. Flap advancing distance and vascular compromise were analyzed. Results: The average patient age at the time of surgery was 69 (standard deviation [SD] 15) years with more males (n = 33, 92%) than females (n = 3, 8%). Of 36 patients, 18 had posterior defects, 16 had anterior defects, and 2 had defects straddling both regions. Fifteen cases had a full fasciocutaneous SMAS island flap, and 21 underwent the partial island modification. Flap ischemia occurred in three cases (8%). The mean flap advancing distance was 3.8 cm (SD 1.1). Of the 5 smokers, none had ischemia of the flap. The median follow-up time was 2 years (range 12-3,170 days). Conclusions: Fasciocutaneous SMAS island and partial island flaps are reliable options for the reconstruction of large cheek defects (3 cm or greater). Anterior pedicle blood supply is more reliable for defects anterior to the line from the lateral brow to the angle of the mandible, whereas the posterior pedicle is a better choice for defects posterior to that line.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
30.00%
发文量
159
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信